Bourbaki

Exercise 12, § 8

Commutative Algebra, VI, 465

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let K be a field, vv a valuation on K, A the ring of the valuation vv and Γ\Gamma its order group.

(a) Let f(X)=a0Xn+a1Xn−1+…+anf(X) = a_0 X^n + a_1 X^{n-1} + \ldots + a_n be a polynomial in A[X]A[X] such that v(a0)=0v(a_0) = 0, all of whose roots belong to K; let xix_i (1≤i≤r1 \leq i \leq r) be these distinct roots and let kik_i be the order of multiplicity of xix_i (1≤i≤r1 \leq i \leq r). Let

g(X)=b0Xn+b1Xn−1+…+bn=b0(X−y1)…(X−yn) g(X) = b_0 X^n + b_1 X^{n-1} + \ldots + b_n = b_0 (X - y_1) \ldots (X - y_n)

another polynomial in A[X]\mathbf{A}[X] such that v(b0)=0v(b_0) = 0 and the yiy_i belong to K. Show that there exists λ0∈Γ\lambda_0 \in \Gamma such that v(xi−xj)<λ0v(x_i - x_j) < \lambda_0 for every ordered pair of distinct indices i,ji, j and, for all A≥AnA \geq A_n, there exists μ≥λ\mu \geq \lambda such that the relations v(ai−bi)≥μv(a_i - b_i) \geq \mu for all ii imply that, for 1≤i≤r1 \leq i \leq r, there are exactly kik_i indices hh such that v(xi−yh)≥Av(x_i - y_h) \geq A. (First evaluate v(f(yh))v(f(y_h)) in two ways to show that necessarily v(xi−yh)≥λv(x_i - y_h) \geq \lambda for at least one ii; then evaluate

v(f′(z)f(z)−g′(z)g(z)) v \left( \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} - \frac{g'(z)}{g(z)} \right)

at suitable points z∈Kz \in K.) If further bi=aib_i = a_i except for i=n−1i = n - 1, show that, so long as λ0\lambda_0 is sufficiently large, the yhy_h are all distinct (evaluate f′(yh)/f(yh)f'(y_h)/f(y_h) assuming that yhy_h is not a simple root of gg).

(b) Suppose henceforth that K is the algebraic closure of a subfield K0K_0 such that An=A∩K0A_n = A \cap K_0 is Henselian. Suppose that the polynomial ff belongs to A0[X]A_0[X] and is irreducible and separable over K0K_0. Let z∈Kz \in K be such that

u(z−vi)>v(z−xj) u(z - v_i) > v(z - x_j)

for all j≠ij \neq i; then show that K0(xi)⊂K0(z)K_0(x_i) \subset K_0(z). (Show that z−xiz - x_i is equal to all its conjugates with respect to K0(xi)K_0(x_i).)

(c) Suppose that f∈A0[X]f \in A_0[X] is separable and let f=a0∏i=1rfif = a_0 \prod_{i=1}^r f_i be the decomposition off into monic irreducible polynomials in K0[X]K_0[X] (which belong in fact to A0[X]A_0[X], cf. Chapter V, § 1, no. 3, Proposition 11). Show (in the notation of (a)) that, if μ\mu is taken sufficiently large, the decomposition of g into monic irreducible factors in K0[X]K_0[X] can be written as b0∏i=1rgib_0 \prod_{i=1}^r g_i, where, for all ii, gig_i is of the same degree as fif_i (a decomposition said to be "of the same type" as that of ff) and further the splitting fields of fif_i and gig_i are the same for all ii. (Show first that g is separable; consider then a finite Galois extension of K0K_0 containing the roots of ff and g and consider the way in which the Galois group of this extension permutes these roots; finally use (b).)

(d) Give an example where ff is irreducible but not separable and where, for all μ≥An\mu \geq A_n there exists a polynomial

g(X)=b0Xn+b1Xn−1+…+br∈A0[X] g(X) = b_0 X^n + b_1 X^{n-1} + \ldots + b_r \in A_0[X]

where v(ai−bi)≥μv(a_i - b_i) \geq \mu for all ii, which is not irreducible (take K0K_0 such that K≠K0K \neq K_0 and K is a radicial extension of K0K_0).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.