Exercise 6, § 8
Commutative Algebra, VI, 462
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
Let K be a field, v a valuation on K and A the ring of v.
(a) Suppose that A is Henselian (Chapter III, § 4, Exercise 3) in which case we also say, by an abuse of language, that K is Henselian for v. Then, for every algebraic extension L of K and every valuation v' on L extending v, the ring A' of v' is Henselian (Chapter III, § 4, Exercise 4).
(b) If K is complete with v and v is of height 1, A is Henselian. Give an example where K is complete with v and v is of height 2, but A is not Henselian (cf. Exercise 1).
(c) If K is linearly compact with v, show that K is Henselian. (In the notation condition (H) of Chapter III, § 4, Exercise 3, let denote the set of prime ideals of A (totally) ordered by inclusion and the set of ordered pairs (), where is a well ordered subset (with respect to the relation ) of and a mapping from to the set , with the following properties: (1) Q, and are monic of respective degrees and ; (2) if p are two elements of , the coefficients of the polynomials and belong to p; (3) the coefficientsof belong to p; (4) , . Define on an ordering by setting when and is an extension of to .Prove that admits a maximal element and that has a last element equal to (0): obtain a contradiction from the opposite by considering two cases, according to whether or not has a last element; in the former case, if p is this last element, consider an element c such that is the least value taken by v on the set of coefficientsof and the least prime ideal p' of A containing c; if , use Exercise 2 (a) of § 4 and the fact that a quotient of a linearly compact module by a closed submodule is linearly compact and hence complete. If on the contrary has no last element, use directly the hypothesis that A is linearly compact.)
(d) In the notation of Exercise 5, show that for to be Henselian, it is necessary and sufficient that and be so. (Note that, if , there exists such that (where is the degree of ); to verify axiom (H) of Chapter III, § 4, Exercise 3 for , attention may be confined to the polynomials of ; use the fact that , where is a prime ideal of contained in the maximal ideal , and note that, if two polynomials in are strongly relatively prime, so are their images in .)
(e) Suppose that is Henselian; then, for every algebraic extension of , there exists (up to equivalence) only one valuation on extending . (If is a monic irreducible polynomial, () the distinct roots of in its splitting field , show that, for every valuation on extending , the are all equal for .) Conversely, if the valuation ring has this property, it is Henselian (observe that, in the integral closure of in , there can only exist one maximal ideal lying above (Chapter V, § 1, Exercise 13) and conclude that, if is a monic irreducible polynomial its image in cannot be a product of two relatively prime polynomials).
Solution
No solution has been written yet.