Bourbaki

Exercise 9, § 3

Algebra, I, 132

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Suppose given on E an (associative and commutative) addition under which all the elements of E are invertible and a multiplication which is non-associative, but commutative and doubly distributive with respect to addition. Suppose further that n∈Z,n≠0n \in \mathbf{Z}, n \neq 0 and nx=0nx = 0 imply x=0x = 0 in E. Show that if, writing [x,y,z]=(xy)z−x(yz)[x, y, z] = (xy)z - x(yz), the identity

[xy,u,z]+[yz,u,z]+[zx,u,y]=0 [xy, u, z] + [yz, u, z] + [zx, u, y] = 0
holds, then xm+n=xmxnx^{m+n} = x^mx^n for all xx (show, by induction on pp, that the identity [xq,y,xp−q]=0[x^q, y, x^{p-q}] = 0 holds for 1≤q<p1 \leq q < p).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.