Bourbaki

Exercise 15, § 4

Algebra, I, 134

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let F\mathscr{F} be a set of stable subgroups of a group with operators GG; F\mathscr{F} is said to satisfy the maximal condition (resp. minimal condition) if every subset of F\mathscr{F}, ordered by inclusion, has a maximal (resp. minimal) element.

Suppose that the set of all stable subgroups of a group G satisfies the minimal condition.

(a) Prove that there exists no stable subgroup of G isomorphic to G and distinct from G (argue by reductio ad absurdum by showing that the hypothesis would imply the existence of a strictly decreasing infinite sequence of stable subgroups of G).

(b) The minimal elements of the set of normal stable subgroups of G not consisting only of e are called minimal normal stable subgroups. Let M\mathfrak{M} be a set of minimal normal stable subgroups of G and S the smallest stable subgroup of G containing all the subgroups belonging to M\mathfrak{M}; show that S is the direct product of a finite number of minimal normal stable subgroups of G (let (Mn)(M_n) be a sequence of minimal normal stable subgroups of G belonging to M\mathfrak{M} and such that Mn+1M_{n+1} is not contained in the stable subgroup generated by the union of M1,M2,…,MnM_1, M_2, \ldots, M_n; let SkS_k be the stable subgroup generated by the union of the MnM_n of index n≥kn \geq k; show that Sk+1=SkS_{k+1} = S_k after a certain rank and therefore that (Mn)(M_n) is a finite sequence; finally use no. 9, Proposition 15).

(c) If G is a group without operators, show that every minimal normal subgroup M of G is the direct product of a finite number of simple groups isomorphic to one another (let N be a minimal normal subgroup of M; show that M is the smallest subgroup of G containing all the subgroups aNa−1aNa^{-1} where a runs through G, and then apply (b) to the group M).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.