§ 6. Extensions, solvable groups, nilpotent groups
Throughout this paragraph, the group laws are, unless expressly mentioned otherwise, written multiplicatively.
1. Extensions
Definition 1
Let and be two groups. An extension of by is a triple , where is a group, an injective homomorphism of into and a surjective homomorphism of onto such that . A homomorphism (resp. ) such that (resp. ) is called a section (resp. retraction) of the extension .
An extension of by is often denoted by the diagram , in which and are sometimes omitted if no confusion can arise. It is sometimes said simply that the group is an extension of by .
For a group to be an extension of by , it is necessary and sufficient that it contain a normal subgroup isomorphic to such that the quotient group is isomorphic to .
An extension is called central if the image is contained in the centre of ; this is only possible if is commutative.
Let and be two extensions of by . A morphism of into is a homomorphism such that and , or, in other words, such that the following diagram is commutative:
Proposition 1
Let and be extensions of by . If is a morphism of into , is an isomorphism of onto and is a morphism of into .
Let be such that . Then , whence . Let be such that ; then . As is injective, and . Therefore is injective. By virtue of § 4, no. 6, Corollary 1 to Proposition 7, is surjective since . The last assertion is immediate.
In other words, the extensions and are isomorphic if and only if there exists a morphism of into .
Let and be two groups and write ; let be the canonical injection and be the canonical projection. Every extension of by isomorphic to the extension is called a trivial extension.
Proposition 2
Let be an extension of by . The following conditions are equivalent*:
(i) is a trivial extension; (ii) has a retraction ; (iii) has a section such that is contained in the centralizer of .
Clearly (i) implies (ii) and (iii). If (ii) holds, the mapping is a morphism of into , whence (i). If (iii) holds, the homomorphism of into corresponding to ( 4, no. 9, Proposition 12) is a morphism of into , whence (i).
It may be that an extension is not trivial and yet the group is isomorphic to (Exercise 6).
Definition 2
Let and be two groups and a homomorphism of into the automorphism group of . Write for and . The set with the law of composition
is called the external semi-direct product of by relative to .
The external semi-direct product of by relative to is denoted by .
Proposition 3
The external semi-direct product is a group. The mappings defined by , defined by , and defined by are group homomorphisms. The triple is an extension of by and is a section of the extension.
We have:
Now , which shows that the law of composition defined by (1) is associative. The element is the identity under this law. The element admits as inverse . Hence the law of composition on is a group law. The other assertions are immediate.
Using the notation of Proposition 3, will denote the extension
Let be an extension of by and a section of . We define an operation of on the group by:
(2)
Proposition 4
With the above notation, there exists one and only one isomorphism u of onto such that .
Therefore, is a homomorphism of into . Obviously , and .
Remark
The definition of the operation by formula (2) depends on the extension and the section . When is commutative, the operation does not depend on . For depends then only on the coset of mod. .
More generally, let be an extension of by a commutative group (it is not assumed that admits a section). The group operates on by inner automorphisms, this image is trivial on the image of and hence defines an operation of on . If admits a section, this operation is that defined by formula (2).
Corollary
Let be a group and and two subgroups of such that is normal, and . Let be the operation of on by inner automorphisms of . The mapping is an isomorphism of onto .
Under the hypotheses of this corollary, is said to be the semi-direct product of by .
Example
(1) Let be a group and a homogeneous principal -set; let denote the automorphism group of . Let be the set of permutations of with the following property: There exists such that is a -morphism of into (that is, for and ). The above formula shows that if there exists a unique such that is a -morphism, we shall denote it by . Let be in , . Then, for all and all ,
2. Commutators
Definition 3
Let be a group and and two elements of . The element of is called the commutator of and .
(x, y) is used to denote the commutator of x and y. Then obviously
For , we prove the following relations: (4)
Now
If A and B are two subgroups of G, (A, B) denotes the subgroup generated by the commutators with and .† Then if and only if A centralizes B. if and only if B normalizes A. If A and B are normal (resp. characteristic), so is .
† We here reject the notational convention made in § 1, no 1 of extending a law of composition to subsets.
Proposition 5
Let be three subgroups of .
(i) The subgroup normalizes the subgroup .
(ii) If the subgroup normalizes , the subgroup is generated by the elements with and .
(iii) If and are normal, then
By (4 bis), for and ,
whence (i). Suppose now that normalizes . For and , (4) implies
and since normalizes , whence by induction on the fact that , for , belongs to the subgroup generated by the elements of the form . If finally and are normal, so are the subgroups , and . It therefore suffices by (ii) to show that
for all and . Now by (5), writing
whence (iii).
Definition 4
Let be a group. The subgroup generated by the commutators of elements of is called the derived group of .
The derived group of is thus the subgroup . It is also denoted by . By an abuse of language, it is sometimes called the commutator group of although it is in general distinct from the set of commutators of elements of (Exercise 16). if and only if is commutative.
Proposition 6
Let be a group homomorphism. Then . If is surjective, the homomorphism of into the restriction of is surjective.
The image under of a commutator of elements of is a commutator of elements of . If is surjective, the image under of the set of commutators of is the set of commutators of . The proposition thus follows from § 4, no. 3, Corollary 3 to Proposition 2.
Corollary 1
The derived group of a group is a characteristic subgroup of . In particular it is a normal subgroup of .
Corollary 2
Let G be a group. The quotient group G/D(G) is commutative. Let be the canonical homomorphism. Every homomorphism f of G into a commutative group G' can be expressed uniquely in the form , where is a homomorphism.
Now . As is surjective, it follows that , whence the first assertion. The second follows from § 4, no. 4, Proposition 5.
Corollary 3
Let H be a subgroup of G. The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) ; (ii) H is a normal subgroup and is commutative. (ii) (i) by Corollary 2 and (i) (ii) by § 4, no. 7, Theorem 4, since every subgroup of a commutative group is normal.
Corollary 4
Let G be a group and X a subset of G which generates G. The group D(G) is the normal subgroup of G generated by the commutators of elements of X.
Let H be the normal subgroup of G generated by the commutators of elements of X and the canonical homomorphism. The set generates . The elements of are pairwise permutable and hence H is commutative (§ 4, no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 2). Hence (Corollary 3) H contains D(G). On the other hand, obviously .
Remark
(1) Corollary 2 can also be expressed by saying that , together with , is a solution of the universal mapping problem for G, relative to commutative groups and homomorphisms from G to commutative groups.
(2) Under the hypotheses of Corollary 4, the subgroup generated by the commutators of elements of X is contained in D(G) but is not in general equal to D(G) (cf. Exercise 15e).
Example
(1) If G is a non-commutative simple group, then . Therefore every homomorphism of G into a commutative group is trivial.
(2) The derived group of the symmetric group is the alternating group . For is generated by the products of two transpositions; if and are two transpositions, let be a permutation such that and . Then and is a commutator. Hence . As is commutative, (Corollary 3).
3. Lower central series, nilpotent groups
Let G be a group, H a subgroup of G and K a normal subgroup of G. The image of H in G/K is contained in the centre of G/K if and only if .
Definition 5
Let G be a group. The lower central series of G is the sequence of subgroups of G defined inductively by:
Let be a group homomorphism. It is seen, by induction on , that and that, if is surjective, . In particular, for all , is a characteristic (and hence normal) subgroup of . For all , is contained in the centre of .
Let be a decreasing sequence of normal subgroups of such that (1) ; (2) for all , is contained in the centre of . Then , as is seen by induction on .
Now
Definition 6
A group is called nilpotent if there exists an integer such that . The least integer such that is called the nilpotency class of a nilpotent group .
If , a group of nilpotency class is called a nilpotent group of class . It is sometimes said that the nilpotency class of a group is finite if is nilpotent.
Example
(1) A group is nilpotent of class 0 (resp. ) if and only if it consists of the identity element (resp. is commutative).
(2) *For every commutative ring and every integer , the upper strict triangular group is nilpotent of class (and exactly of class if ).
(3) Let be a nilpotent group of class . Every subgroup (resp. every quotient group) of is nilpotent of class . For, if is a subgroup of , then . If is a quotient group of and is the canonical homomorphism, then .
(4) A finite product of nilpotent groups is nilpotent.
Proposition 7
Let be a group and an integer. The following conditions are equivalent:
(a) is nilpotent of class . (b) There exists a series of subgroups of :
(c) There exists a subgroup of contained in the centre of such that is nilpotent of class .
(a) (b): it suffices to take . (b) (a): by induction on , . (a) (c): it suffices to take . (c) (a): let be the canonical homomorphism; then and hence , whence .
More briefly: a group is nilpotent of class if it can be obtained from the group by successive central extensions.
Corollary
A central extension of a nilpotent group (by a necessarily commutative group) is nilpotent.
Proposition 8
Let be a nilpotent group of class and let be a subgroup of . There exists a sequence of subgroups
such that is normal in and is commutative for all .
Choose a sequence of subgroups of satisfying the conditions of Proposition 7 (b) for all ; is normal in . Write:
It is necessary to verify that is normalized by ; as it is normalized by , it suffices to verify that it is by . Now, if and ,
and is contained in ; hence , which shows that is normal in .
Finally, the canonical homomorphism is obviously surjective; as the first group is commutative, so is the second.
Corollary 1
Let be a nilpotent group and a subgroup of . If is distinct from , the normalizer of in is distinct from .
Let be the largest index such that . The group normalizes and is distinct from .
Corollary 2
Let be a nilpotent group and a subgroup of . If is distinct from , there exists a normal subgroup of , containing , distinct from and such that is commutative.
Let be the least index such that . The group satisfies the required conditions.
Corollary 3
Let G be a nilpotent group and H a subgroup of G. If G = H.(G, G), then G = H.
Every subgroup N of G which contains H and such that G/N is commutative contains H.(G, G). Corollary 3 thus follows from Corollary 2.
Corollary 3 can also be formulated thus: let X be a subset of G. For X to generate G, it is necessary and sufficient that the image of X in G/D(G) generate G/D(G).
Corollary 4
Let f: G' → G be a group homomorphism. Suppose that* (a) G is nilpotent. (b) The homomorphism f₁: G'/(G', G') → G/(G, G), derived from f by passing to the quotients, is surjective. *Then f is surjective.
This follows from Corollary 3 applied to the subgroup H = f(G').
Proposition 9
Let G be a nilpotent group of class ≤ n and let N be a normal subgroup of G. There exists a series of subgroups
such that (G, N^k) ⊂ N^{k+1} for k = 1, ..., n.
If (G^k) satisfies condition (b) of Proposition 7, then take
Corollary 1
Let G be a nilpotent group, Z the centre of G and N a normal subgroup of G. If N ≠ {e}, then N ∩ Z ≠ {e}.
Let k be the largest index such that N^k ≠ {e}. The group N^k is contained in N. On the other hand, (G, N^k) ⊂ N^{k+1} = {e}; hence N^k is contained in the centre Z of G.
Corollary 2
Let f be a homomorphism from a nilpotent group G to a group G'. If the restriction of f to the centre of G is injective, f is injective.
This is Corollary 1 applied to Ker(f).
4. Derived series, solvable groups
Definition 7
Let G be a group. The derived series of G is the series (D^n(G))_{n \in \mathbf{N}} defined inductively by:
Then . For all n \in \mathbf{N}, D^n(G) \subset C^{2^n}(G), as is seen by induction on n using formula (7) of no. 3.
Let be a group homomorphism. It is seen, by induction on n, that and that, if is surjective, . In particular, for all , is a characteristic (and therefore normal) subgroup of G. For all , the group is a commutative normal (but not in general central) subgroup of .
Let be a decreasing sequence of subgroups of G such that: (1) ; (2) for all , is normal in and is commutative. Then for all , as is seen by induction on .
Definition 8
A group G is called solvable if there exists an integer n such that . If G is a solvable group, the least integer n such that is called the solvability class of G.
A solvable group of solvability class is called a solvable group of class . A group is sometimes said to be of finite solvability class if it is solvable.
Example
(1) A group is solvable of class 0 (resp. ) if and only if it is reduced to (resp. is commutative).
(2) Every nilpotent group of class is solvable of class ; this follows from the relation proved above.
(3) Let G be a solvable group of class . Every subgroup (resp. quotient group) of G is solvable of class (proof analogous to that of no. 3, Example 3).
(4) If G is a solvable group of class and F is a solvable group of class , every extension E of G by F is a solvable group of class . For, let be the projection; then and therefore ; it follows that .
(5) The symmetric group is solvable if and only if (cf. § 5, Exercises 10 and 16).
(6) *If A is a commutative ring, the upper triangular group T(n, A) is solvable but not in general nilpotent.
Proposition 10
Let G be a group and n an integer. The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) G is solvable of class . (ii) There exists a series of normal subgroups of G
(iv) There exists a normal commutative subgroup of such that is solvable of class .
For (i) (ii) it suffices to take equal to . (ii) (iii) trivially. (iii) (i) for is necessarily contained in . The equivalence of (ii) and (iv) is immediate by induction on .
More briefly: a group is solvable of class if it can be obtained by successive extensions of commutative groups.
Corollary
Let be a finite group and
If the quotients of a composition series of are cyclic and hence commutative, is solvable by Proposition 10. Conversely, if is solvable, the group is, for all , solvable and simple (, no. 7, Proposition 9). Now, every solvable simple group is cyclic of prime order. For is a normal subgroup of ; is impossible for in that case for all ; then and is commutative. The corollary then follows from , no. 10, Corollary to Proposition 20.
5. M646 -groups
In this number and the following, the letter denotes a prime number (, no 10, Proposition 16).
Definition 9
A finite group whose order is a power of is called a -group.
Let be a -group of order . Every divisor of is a power of (, no. 10, Corollary to Theorem 7). Therefore every subgroup and every quotient group of is a -group (, no. 4, Corollary to Proposition 4); the cardinal of every homogeneous space of is a power of (, no. 5, Theorem 1).
An extension of a -group by a -group is a -group.
Examples. (1) A commutative -group is isomorphic to a product of cyclic groups (cf. Exercise 19 and also VII, , no. 7, Proposition 7). (2) Let be a finite field of characteristic . The strict triangular group is a -group. (3) The quaternionic group is a 2-group (cf. Exercise 4).
Proposition 11
Let be a finite set and a -group operating on . Let denote the set of such that for all (the fixed points). Then
E — E^G is a disjoint union of orbits not reduced to a point. The cardinal of such an orbit is a power of distinct from and hence a multiple of .
Corollary
Let G be a p-group. If G is not reduced to e, its centre is not reduced to e.
Let G operate on itself by inner automorphisms. The set of fixed points is the centre Z of G. By Proposition 11,
whence and .
Theorem 1
Let G be a p-group and its order. There exists a sequence of subgroups of G
such that and is cyclic of order .
The theorem is true for . We prove it by induction on . Let Z be the centre of G, an element of Z (Corollary to Proposition 11) and the order of x. Then is an element of order and therefore Z contains a subgroup which is cyclic of order . By the induction hypothesis, the group has a series of subgroups with the required properties. Let be the canonical homomorphism. The sequence of subgroups of G defined by is a solution for is isomorphic to for (§ 4, no. 7, Theorem 4).
Corollary
Every p-group is nilpotent.
This follows from no. 3, Proposition 7.
Proposition 12
Let G be a p-group and H a subgroup of G distinct from G. Then:
(a) The normalizer of H in G is distinct from G. (b) There exists a normal subgroup N of G of index p in G, which contains H.
Assertion (a) follows from no. 3, Corollary 1 to Proposition 8. We prove (b). By no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 8, there exists a normal subgroup of G containing H, distinct from G and such that is commutative. Let N be a maximal subgroup distinct from G containing . Then N is normal (no. 2, Corollary 3 to Proposition 6) and is a simple commutative -group and hence cyclic of order (§ 4, no. 10, Corollary to Proposition 20).
Corollary
Let G be a p-group. Every subgroup of G of index p is normal.
6. Sylow subgroups
Definition 10
Let G be a finite group. A Sylow p-subgroup of G is any subgroup P of G satisfying the two following conditions:
(a) P is a p-group. (b) (G : P) is not a multiple of p.
If the order of G is written in the form , where m is not a multiple of , conditions (a) and (b) are equivalent to .
Example
(1) In the group let be a cycle of order . The subgroup generated by is a Sylow -subgroup of for does not divide . (2) *Let k be a finite field of characteristic and let n be a positive integer. The strict triangular group is a Sylow -subgroup of the group .
Theorem 2
Every finite group contains a Sylow -subgroup.
The proof depends on the following lemma.
Lemma
Let , where m is an integer which is not a multiple of . Then
Let S be a group of order (for example ) and T a set with m elements. Write and let E be the set of subsets of X with elements. Then , whence (Set Theory, III, § 5, no. 8, Corollary 1 to Proposition 11). Let S operate on X by and consider the canonical extension of this operation to E. In the notation of no. 5, Proposition 11, the set is the set of orbits of X, that is the set of subsets of the form , whence . By no. 5, Proposition 11,
We now prove the theorem. Let G be a finite group and n its order; we write , where m is not a multiple of . Let E be the set of subsets of G with elements. Then
, which means that divides . But consists of the such that ; if , then , whence . Hence .
Corollary
If the order of G is divisible by p, the group G contains an element of order p.
By virtue of Theorem 2, this is reduced to the case where G is a -group ; if is different from e, the cyclic group generated by x is then of order with and it therefore contains a subgroup of order .
Remark
For every prime number q dividing Card(G), let P_q be a Sylow q-subgroup of G. Then the subgroup H of G generated by the P_q is of order a multiple of Card(P_q) for each q and of order a divisor of Card(G), hence it is equal to G.
Theorem 3
Let G be a finite group.* (a) The Sylow p-subgroups of G are conjugate to one another. Their number is congruent to 1 mod. p. (b) *Every subgroup of G which is a p-group is contained in a Sylow p-subgroup.
Let P be a Sylow -subgroup of G (Theorem 2) and let H be a -subgroup of G. Let E = G/P and consider the operation of H on G/P. As Card(E) mod. , Proposition 11 of no. 5, shows that there exists such that for all . If g is a representative of x in G, this means that , whence assertion (b).
If H is a Sylow -subgroup, then Card(H) = Card(P) = Card(), whence , which proves the first assertion of (a).
We now prove the second assertion of (a). Let be the set of Sylow -subgroups of G and let P operate on by inner automorphisms. The element is a fixed point under this operation, we show that it is the only one. Let be a fixed point; Q is a Sylow subgroup of G normalized by P and hence P is contained in the normalizer N of Q. The groups P and Q are Sylow -subgroups of N; hence there exists such that . By no. 5, Proposition 11, Card() Card() = 1 (mod. ).
Corollary 1
Let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of G, let N be its normalizer in G and let M be a subgroup of G containing N. The normalizer of M in G is equal to M.
Let be such that . The subgroup of M is a Sylow -subgroup of M. There thus exists such that ; then , whence .
Corollary 2
Let be a homomorphism of finite groups. For every Sylow p-subgroup of there exists a Sylow p-subgroup of such that .
This follows from Theorem 3 (b) applied to the subgroup of .
Corollary 3
(a) Let be a subgroup of . For every Sylow -subgroup of there exists a Sylow -subgroup of such that .
(b) Conversely, if is a Sylow -subgroup of and is normal in , the group is a Sylow -subgroup of .
(a) The -group is contained in a Sylow -subgroup of and is a -subgroup of containing and is hence equal to .
(b) Let be a Sylow -subgroup of . There exists an element such that . As is normal, is contained in and hence in . As is a -subgroup of and is a Sylow -subgroup of , .
Corollary 4
Let be a normal subgroup of . The image in of a Sylow -subgroup of is a Sylow -subgroup of and every Sylow -subgroup of is obtained in this way.
Let and be the image in of a Sylow -subgroup of . The group operates transitively on and hence is equipotent to , where is a subgroup of containing . Therefore divides , is thus not a multiple of and the -group is a Sylow -subgroup of . Let be another Sylow -subgroup of ; then for some ; if is a representative of , the group is the image of .
7. Finite nilpotent groups
Theorem 4
Let be a finite group. The following conditions are equivalent:
(a) is nilpotent. (b) is a product of -groups. (c) For every prime number there exists a normal Sylow -subgroup of . (b) (a) (no. 5, Corollary to Theorem 1).
Suppose (a) holds and let be a Sylow -subgroup of . If is the normalizer of in , Corollary 1 to Theorem 3 shows that is its own normalizer. By § 6, no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 8, this shows that . Hence (a) (c).
Suppose (c) holds and let be the set of prime numbers dividing . For all , let be a normal Sylow -subgroup of . For all , is reduced to for it is both a -group and a -group, hence and centralize one another (, no. 9, Proposition 15). Let be the canonical homomorphism (, no. 9, Proposition 12) of into . The homomorphism is surjective by the Remark of no. 6. As , it follows that is bijective.
Remark
(1) Let G be a finite group and a prime number. By no. 6, Theorem 3 (a) and no. 6, Theorem 2, the following conditions are equivalent: (i) there exists a normal Sylow -subgroup of G; (ii) every Sylow -subgroup of G is normal; (iii) there exists only one Sylow -subgroup of G.
(2) Let G be a nilpotent finite group. Let I be the set of prime divisors of Card(G). By Theorem 4 and Remark 1, , where is the unique Sylow -group of G.
(3) Applied to commutative groups, Theorem 4 gives the decomposition, of commutative finite groups as a product of primary components, which will be studied from another point of view in Chapter VII.
Example
The group is of order 6. It contains a normal Sylow 3-subgroup of order 3: the group . It contains three Sylow 2-subgroups of order 2: the groups , where is a transposition. The group is thus not nilpotent.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 6.