Bourbaki

Exercise 15, § 2

Algebra, II, 390

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

An AA-module homomorphism u:E→Fu: E \to F is called essential if it is injective and if, for every submodule P≠{0}P \neq \{0\} of FF, u−1(P)≠{0}u^{-1}(P) \neq \{0\}; it suffices that this condition holds for every monogenous submodule P≠{0}P \neq \{0\} of FF. If EE is a submodule of FF, FF is called an essential extension of EE if the canonical injection E→FE \to F is essential.

(a) Let u:E→Fu: E \to F, v:F→Gv: F \to G be two AA-homomorphisms of AA-modules. If uu and vv are essential, so is v∘uv \circ u. Conversely, if v∘uv \circ u is essential and vv is injective, then uu and vv are essential.

(b) Let EE be a submodule of an AA-module FF and let (Fλ)λ∈L(F_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} be a family of submodules of FF containing EE and whose union is FF. Show that if each of the FλF_\lambda is an essential extension of EE, so is FF.

(c) Let (uλ)λ∈L(u_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} be a family of essential homomorphisms uλ:Eλ→Fλu_\lambda: E_\lambda \to F_\lambda. Show that the homomorphism ⨁λ∈Luλ:⨁λ∈LEλ→⨁λ∈LFλ\bigoplus_{\lambda \in L} u_\lambda: \bigoplus_{\lambda \in L} E_\lambda \to \bigoplus_{\lambda \in L} F_\lambda is essential. (Prove it first when LL has two elements, then use (b)(b).)

(d) The Z\mathbf{Z}-module Q\mathbf{Q} is an essential extension of Z\mathbf{Z} but the product QN\mathbf{Q}^{\mathbf{N}} is not an essential extension of ZN\mathbf{Z}^{\mathbf{N}}.

(e) Let EE be a submodule of a module FF. Show that there exists a submodule

Q of F such that Q ∩ E = {0} and that the restriction to E of the canonical homomorphism F → F/Q is essential.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.