§ 3. Algebraic extensions
1. Algebraic elements of an algebra
Let A be an algebra over a field K and x an element of A. Two cases are possible:
a) The family of monomials is free over . Then we say that is transcendental over . There is an isomorphism of the polynomial algebra onto the subalgebra of generated by , and the latter is of infinite degree over .
b) There exists an integer such that the monomials are linearly dependent; it comes to the same to say that there exists a polynomial in such that . Then we say that is algebraic over . The least integer satisfying the above property is called the degree of over . If the degree of over is , then the monomials are linearly independent over and there exist elements of such that
Theorem 1
— Let be an algebra over a field , an element of algebraic over , the degree and the minimal polynomial of over .
a) For a polynomial to satisfy it is necessary and sufficient that should be a multiple of .
b) The mapping defines by passage to quotients an isomorphism of the quotient algebra onto the algebra , and the elements form a basis of over . In particular, .
c) Assume that is an integral domain. Then is a field and the unique monic irreducible polynomial in such that .
d) For to be invertible in it is necessary and sufficient that ; then we have .
There exists a unique algebra homomorphism such that ; we have for every and the image of equals . Let be the kernel of : by construction, the minimal polynomial of over belongs to and it is the monic polynomial of least degree in . Therefore (, p. 11, Prop. 11) we have , whence . Assertion ) follows at once from a) and the Cor. of Prop. 10 of , p. 11.
Suppose that is an integral domain. The algebra is then an integral domain and of finite degree over , hence it is a field (, p. 10, Cor.). The ideal of is thus maximal, that means that is irreducible in (, p. 13). Finally, let be a monic irreducible polynomial in such that ; by ) it is a multiple of , hence , and this proves ).
It remains to prove ). There exists a polynomial of degree and an element of such that , whence . If , we have , and , so then is not invertible in . If on the other hand , then we have , so is then invertible in and .
Corollary 1
— Let be an algebra over a field . For an element of to be algebraic over it is necessary and sufficient that the subalgebra of generated by should be of finite degree over . In particular, if is of finite degree over , every element of is algebraic over .
Corollary 2
— Let be an extension of , an algebra over and an element of algebraic over . Then is algebraic over , the minimal polynomial of over divides the minimal polynomial of over and the degree of over is at most equal to the degree of over .
For let be the minimal polynomial of over ; we have and , hence is algebraic over and is a multiple of the minimal polynomial of over (Th. 1, a).
Remark
Let be an extension of a field and an element of which is root of a monic irreducible polynomial . Th. 1, c) then shows that is the minimal polynomial of over .
Example 1
In the field of complex numbers , the number is algebraic of degree 2 over the prime field ; for if , then , and for all , hence . The field is thus an extension of degree 2 of ; it consists of all numbers , where are rational. Likewise is algebraic of degree 2 over the field of real numbers, and is an extension of degree 2 of . \
Example 2
Let be a field and the field of rational functions in one indeterminate over . Let be the subfield of ; we have and is algebraic over , since it is a root of the polynomial of the ring ; this polynomial is irreducible in , for in the contrary case it would have at least one factor of the first degree, and there would then exist two non-zero polynomials , of such that which is absurd, for if and are the degrees of and , this would imply , or . The field is thus of degree 3 over , and every element of may be written in just one way as a linear combination , where are three rational fractions of .
Example 3
\* In the field of real numbers it may be shown that the number is transcendental over the prime field . \
2. Algebraic extensions
Definition 1
— An extension of a field is said to be algebraic (over ) if every element of is algebraic over . An extension of which is not algebraic is called transcendental (over ).
Proposition 1
— For an extension of to be algebraic it is necessary and sufficient that every sub-K-algebra of should be a field.
Cf. for example D. Hilbert, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, vol. 1, p. 1 (Berlin (Springer), 1932).
The condition is necessary : if is algebraic over and is an element of a sub-K-algebra of , then by , p. 16, Th. 1, d). Therefore is a field.
The condition is sufficient : if it is satisfied and is an element in , then the ring is a field, hence ; in other words, there exists a polynomial such that , or also ; this shows to be algebraic over , hence is an algebraic extension of .
Proposition 2
— *If an extension E of K is of finite degree n, then it is algebraic and the degree over K of each element of E divides n.
For, given , is finite and divides n (, p. 10, Cor. 1) and hence is algebraic over (, p. 17, Cor. 1).
There exist algebraic extensions of infinite degree, for example the algebraic closure of a finite field (V, p. 24, Remark 4).
Theorem 2
— *Let E be a finitely generated extension of K, generated by the elements , which are algebraic over K; then E is an extension of finite degree of K. If the degree of over is (for ), then the degree of E over K is and the elements () form a basis of E over K.
The elements () form a basis of over by Th. 1, b) of , p. 16; the theorem therefore follows by induction on from Prop. 25 of II, p. 222.
Corollary 1
— *Let E be an extension of K and A a subset of E consisting of elements that are algebraic over K. Then is algebraic over K and we have .
For each belongs to a field , where F is a finite subset of (, p. 11, Cor.); now is algebraic over and equal to by Th. 2, hence is algebraic over and .
Corollary 2
— *Let L be an extension of K and E, F subextensions of L. If F is algebraic over K, the subring of L generated by is a field coinciding with and algebraic over E.
For each element of , being algebraic over , is also algebraic over (, p. 17, Cor. 2) hence is an algebraic extension of , and we have by Cor. 1.
Remark 1
With the notation of Th. 2, and hence is isomorphic to a quotient ; since is a field, is a maximal ideal in .
Remark 2
Let be an algebraic extension of , of infinite degree. By Th. 2 there exists an infinite sequence , of elements of such that ; Th. 2 shows further that the degree of over takes arbitrarily large values. In other words, if E is an algebraic extension of K such that the degrees [F : K] of the subextensions F of E of finite degree over K are bounded, then E is an extension of finite degree of K.
3. Transitivity of algebraic extensions. Fields that are relatively algebraically closed in an extension field
Proposition 3
— Let E and F be two extension fields of a field K such that K ⊂ E ⊂ F. For F to be algebraic over K it is necessary and sufficient that E should be algebraic over K and F algebraic over E.
The condition is necessary, by V, p. 17, Cor. 2. Let us show that it is sufficient. Let x be any element of F; it is algebraic over E; let g ∈ E[X] be its minimal polynomial over E. If A is the (finite) set of coefficients of g, then g ∈ K(A)[X], hence x is algebraic over K(A) and K(A U {x}) = K(A)(x) is of finite degree over K(A). Now A ⊂ E and E is algebraic over K, hence K(A) is of finite degree over K, by Th. 2. Therefore (V, p. 10, Th. 1), K(A U {x}) is of finite degree over K, which shows x to be algebraic over K (V, p. 18, Prop. 2).
Definition 2
— A subfield K of a field E is said to be relatively algebraically closed in E if every element of E which is algebraic over K, belongs to K.
It comes to the same to say that K is the only algebraic extension of K contained in E. Every field K is relatively algebraically closed in itself. In § 4 we shall study the fields which are relatively algebraically closed in each extension field.
Proposition 4
— Let E be an extension of a field K; the set L of elements of E which are algebraic over K forms a subextension of E which is relatively algebraically closed in E.
For the field K(L) is algebraic over K (Cor. 1 of Th. 2), hence K(L) ⊂ L; it follows that K(L) = L and L is a field. On the other hand, if x ∈ E is algebraic over L, it is so also over K (Prop. 3) and hence belongs to L.
The extension L of K consisting of all the elements of E that are algebraic over K is called the relative algebraic closure of K in E; it is the largest algebraic extension of K contained in E.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 3.