Bourbaki

§ 3. Algebraic extensions

1. Algebraic elements of an algebra

Let A be an algebra over a field K and x an element of A. Two cases are possible:

a) The family of monomials (xn)n∈N(x^n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} is free over KK. Then we say that xx is transcendental over KK. There is an isomorphism of the polynomial algebra K[X]K[X] onto the subalgebra K[x]K[x] of AA generated by xx, and the latter is of infinite degree over KK.

b) There exists an integer n≥1n \geq 1 such that the monomials 1, x, …, xn−1, xn1,\ x,\ \ldots,\ x^{n-1},\ x^n are linearly dependent; it comes to the same to say that there exists a polynomial f≠0f \neq 0 in K[X]K[X] such that f(x)=0f(x) = 0. Then we say that xx is algebraic over KK. The least integer n≥1n \geq 1 satisfying the above property is called the degree of xx over KK. If the degree of xx over KK is nn, then the monomials 1, x, …, xn−11,\ x,\ \ldots,\ x^{n-1} are linearly independent over KK and there exist elements a0, a1, …, an−1a_0,\ a_1,\ \ldots,\ a_{n-1} of KK such that

xn=a0+a1x+⋯+an−1xn−1 x^n = a_0 + a_1 x + \cdots + a_{n-1} x^{n-1}
The polynomial f(X)=Xn−∑k=0n−1akXkf(X) = X^n - \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} a_k X^k is the unique monic polynomial of degree nn in K[X]K[X] such that f(x)=0f(x) = 0; it is called the minimal polynomial of xx over KK.

Theorem 1

— Let AA be an algebra over a field KK, xx an element of AA algebraic over KK, nn the degree and ff the minimal polynomial of xx over KK.

a) For a polynomial g∈K[X]g \in K[X] to satisfy g(x)=0g(x) = 0 it is necessary and sufficient that gg should be a multiple of ff.

b) The mapping g↦g(x)g \mapsto g(x) defines by passage to quotients an isomorphism of the quotient algebra K[X]/(f)K[X]/(f) onto the algebra K[x]K[x], and the elements 1, x, …, xn−11,\ x,\ \ldots,\ x^{n-1} form a basis of K[x]K[x] over KK. In particular, [K[x]:K]=n[K[x]:K] = n.

c) Assume that AA is an integral domain. Then K[x]K[x] is a field and ff the unique monic irreducible polynomial in K[X]K[X] such that f(x)=0f(x) = 0.

d) For xx to be invertible in AA it is necessary and sufficient that f(0)≠0f(0) \neq 0; then we have x−1∈K[x]x^{-1} \in K[x].

There exists a unique algebra homomorphism φ:K[X]→A\varphi : K[X] \to A such that φ(X)=x\varphi(X) = x; we have φ(P)=P(x)\varphi(P) = P(x) for every P∈K[X]P \in K[X] and the image of φ\varphi equals K[x]K[x]. Let aa be the kernel of φ\varphi: by construction, the minimal polynomial ff of xx over KK belongs to aa and it is the monic polynomial of least degree in aa. Therefore (IVIV, p. 11, Prop. 11) we have a=(f)a = (f), whence aa. Assertion bb) follows at once from a) and the Cor. of Prop. 10 of IVIV, p. 11.

Suppose that AA is an integral domain. The algebra K[x]K[x] is then an integral domain and of finite degree over KK, hence it is a field (VV, p. 10, Cor.). The ideal (f)(f) of K[x]K[x] is thus maximal, that means that ff is irreducible in K[X]K[X] (IVIV, p. 13). Finally, let gg be a monic irreducible polynomial in K[X]K[X] such that g(x)=0g(x) = 0; by aa) it is a multiple of ff, hence g=fg = f, and this proves cc).

It remains to prove dd). There exists a polynomial g∈K[X]g \in K[X] of degree n−1n-1 and an element aa of KK such that f(X)=Xg(X)+af(X) = Xg(X) + a, whence f(0)=af(0) = a. If a=0a = 0, we have xg(x)=f(x)=0xg(x) = f(x) = 0, and g(x)≠0g(x) \neq 0, so then xx is not invertible in AA. If on the other hand a≠0a \neq 0, then we have x⋅[−a−1g(x)]=1x \cdot [-a^{-1}g(x)] = 1, so xx is then invertible in AA and x−1=−a−1g(x)x^{-1} = -a^{-1}g(x).

Corollary 1

— Let AA be an algebra over a field KK. For an element xx of AA to be algebraic over KK it is necessary and sufficient that the subalgebra K[x]K[x] of AA generated by xx should be of finite degree over KK. In particular, if AA is of finite degree over KK, every element of AA is algebraic over KK.

Corollary 2

— Let EE be an extension of KK, AA an algebra over EE and xx an element of AA algebraic over KK. Then xx is algebraic over EE, the minimal polynomial of xx over EE divides the minimal polynomial of xx over KK and the degree of xx over EE is at most equal to the degree of xx over KK.

For let ff be the minimal polynomial of xx over KK; we have f(x)=0f(x) = 0 and f∈E[X]f \in E[X], hence xx is algebraic over EE and ff is a multiple of the minimal polynomial of xx over EE (Th. 1, a).

Remark

Let EE be an extension of a field KK and xx an element of EE which is root of a monic irreducible polynomial f∈K[X]f \in K[X]. Th. 1, c) then shows that ff is the minimal polynomial of xx over KK.

Example 1

In the field of complex numbers C\mathbf{C}, the number ii is algebraic of degree 2 over the prime field Q\mathbf{Q}; for if f(X)=X2+1f(X) = X^2 + 1, then f(i)=0f(i) = 0, and x2+1≠0x^2 + 1 \neq 0 for all x∈Qx \in \mathbf{Q}, hence i∉Qi \notin \mathbf{Q}. The field Q(i)\mathbf{Q}(i) is thus an extension of degree 2 of Q\mathbf{Q}; it consists of all numbers a+bia + bi, where a,ba, b are rational. Likewise ii is algebraic of degree 2 over the field R\mathbf{R} of real numbers, and C\mathbf{C} is an extension of degree 2 of R\mathbf{R}. \

Example 2

Let KK be a field and FF the field K(X)K(X) of rational functions in one indeterminate over KK. Let EE be the subfield K(X3)K(X^3) of FF; we have F=E(X)F = E(X) and XX is algebraic over EE, since it is a root of the polynomial Y3−X3Y^3 - X^3 of the ring E[Y]E[Y]; this polynomial is irreducible in E[Y]E[Y], for in the contrary case it would have at least one factor of the first degree, and there would then exist two non-zero polynomials u(X)u(X), v(X)v(X) of K[X]K[X] such that (u(X3))3=X3(v(X3))3(u(X^3))^3 = X^3(v(X^3))^3 which is absurd, for if mm and nn are the degrees of uu and vv, this would imply 9m=9n+39m = 9n + 3, or 3m=3n+13m = 3n + 1. The field FF is thus of degree 3 over EE, and every element of FF may be written in just one way as a linear combination f(X3)+Xg(X3)+X2h(X3)f(X^3) + Xg(X^3) + X^2 h(X^3), where f,g,hf, g, h are three rational fractions of K(X)K(X).

Example 3

\* In the field R\mathbf{R} of real numbers it may be shown 1^1 that the number π\pi is transcendental over the prime field Q\mathbf{Q}. \

2. Algebraic extensions

Definition 1

— An extension EE of a field KK is said to be algebraic (over KK) if every element of EE is algebraic over KK. An extension EE of KK which is not algebraic is called transcendental (over KK).

Proposition 1

— For an extension EE of KK to be algebraic it is necessary and sufficient that every sub-K-algebra AA of EE should be a field.

1^1 Cf. for example D. Hilbert, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, vol. 1, p. 1 (Berlin (Springer), 1932).

The condition is necessary : if EE is algebraic over KK and x≠0x \neq 0 is an element of a sub-K-algebra AA of EE, then x−1∈K[x]⊂Ax^{-1} \in K[x] \subset A by VV, p. 16, Th. 1, d). Therefore AA is a field.

The condition is sufficient : if it is satisfied and xx is an element ≠0\neq 0 in EE, then the ring K[x]K[x] is a field, hence x−1∈K[x]x^{-1} \in K[x]; in other words, there exists a polynomial g∈K[X]g \in K[X] such that x−1=g(x)x^{-1} = g(x), or also xg(x)−1=0xg(x) - 1 = 0; this shows xx to be algebraic over KK, hence EE is an algebraic extension of KK.

Proposition 2

— *If an extension E of K is of finite degree n, then it is algebraic and the degree over K of each element of E divides n.

For, given x∈Ex \in E, [K(x):K][K(x):K] is finite and divides n (VV, p. 10, Cor. 1) and hence xx is algebraic over KK (VV, p. 17, Cor. 1).

There exist algebraic extensions of infinite degree, for example the algebraic closure of a finite field (V, p. 24, Remark 4).

Theorem 2

— *Let E be a finitely generated extension of K, generated by the elements a1,...,ama_1, ..., a_m, which are algebraic over K; then E is an extension of finite degree of K. If the degree of aia_i over K(a1,a2,...,ai−1)K(a_1, a_2, ..., a_{i-1}) is nin_i (for 1≤i≤m1 \leq i \leq m), then the degree of E over K is n1n2...nmn_1 n_2 ... n_m and the elements a1v1a2v2...amvma_1^{v_1} a_2^{v_2} ... a_m^{v_m} (0≤vi≤ni−10 \leq v_i \leq n_i - 1) form a basis of E over K.

The elements aivia_i^{v_i} (0≤vi≤ni−10 \leq v_i \leq n_i - 1) form a basis of K(a1,a2,...,ai)K(a_1, a_2, ..., a_i) over K(a1,a2,...,ai−1)K(a_1, a_2, ..., a_{i-1}) by Th. 1, b) of VV, p. 16; the theorem therefore follows by induction on mm from Prop. 25 of II, p. 222.

Corollary 1

— *Let E be an extension of K and A a subset of E consisting of elements that are algebraic over K. Then K(A)K(A) is algebraic over K and we have K[A]=K(A)K[A] = K(A).

For each x∈K(A)x \in K(A) belongs to a field K(F)K(F), where F is a finite subset of AA (VV, p. 11, Cor.); now K(F)K(F) is algebraic over KK and equal to K[F]K[F] by Th. 2, hence xx is algebraic over KK and K(A)=K[A]K(A) = K[A].

Corollary 2

— *Let L be an extension of K and E, F subextensions of L. If F is algebraic over K, the subring K[E,F]K[E, F] of L generated by E∪FE \cup F is a field coinciding with E(F)E(F) and algebraic over E.

For each element of FF, being algebraic over KK, is also algebraic over EE (VV, p. 17, Cor. 2) hence E(F)E(F) is an algebraic extension of EE, and we have E(F)=E[F]E(F) = E[F] by Cor. 1.

Remark 1

With the notation of Th. 2, E=K[a1,a2,...,an]E = K[a_1, a_2, ..., a_n] and hence EE is isomorphic to a quotient K[X1,X2,...,Xm]/aK[X_1, X_2, ..., X_m]/\mathfrak{a}; since EE is a field, aa is a maximal ideal in K[X1,...,Xm]K[X_1, ..., X_m].

Remark 2

Let EE be an algebraic extension of KK, of infinite degree. By Th. 2 there exists an infinite sequence (ai)(a_i), of elements of EE such that ai∉K(a1,a2,...,ai−1)a_i \notin K(a_1, a_2, ..., a_{i-1}); Th. 2 shows further that the degree of K(a1,a2,...,an)K(a_1, a_2, ..., a_n) over KK takes arbitrarily large values. In other words, if E is an algebraic extension of K such that the degrees [F : K] of the subextensions F of E of finite degree over K are bounded, then E is an extension of finite degree of K.

3. Transitivity of algebraic extensions. Fields that are relatively algebraically closed in an extension field

Proposition 3

— Let E and F be two extension fields of a field K such that K ⊂ E ⊂ F. For F to be algebraic over K it is necessary and sufficient that E should be algebraic over K and F algebraic over E.

The condition is necessary, by V, p. 17, Cor. 2. Let us show that it is sufficient. Let x be any element of F; it is algebraic over E; let g ∈ E[X] be its minimal polynomial over E. If A is the (finite) set of coefficients of g, then g ∈ K(A)[X], hence x is algebraic over K(A) and K(A U {x}) = K(A)(x) is of finite degree over K(A). Now A ⊂ E and E is algebraic over K, hence K(A) is of finite degree over K, by Th. 2. Therefore (V, p. 10, Th. 1), K(A U {x}) is of finite degree over K, which shows x to be algebraic over K (V, p. 18, Prop. 2).

Definition 2

— A subfield K of a field E is said to be relatively algebraically closed in E if every element of E which is algebraic over K, belongs to K.

It comes to the same to say that K is the only algebraic extension of K contained in E. Every field K is relatively algebraically closed in itself. In § 4 we shall study the fields which are relatively algebraically closed in each extension field.

Proposition 4

— Let E be an extension of a field K; the set L of elements of E which are algebraic over K forms a subextension of E which is relatively algebraically closed in E.

For the field K(L) is algebraic over K (Cor. 1 of Th. 2), hence K(L) ⊂ L; it follows that K(L) = L and L is a field. On the other hand, if x ∈ E is algebraic over L, it is so also over K (Prop. 3) and hence belongs to L.

The extension L of K consisting of all the elements of E that are algebraic over K is called the relative algebraic closure of K in E; it is the largest algebraic extension of K contained in E.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 3.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.