Bourbaki

§ 4. Algebraically closed extensions

1. Algebraically closed fields

Proposition 1

— Let K be a field; then the following properties are equivalent: (AC) Every non-constant polynomial of K[X] splits in K[X] into a product of polynomials of degree 1 (distinct or not). (AC') Every non-constant polynomial of K[X] has at least one root in K. (AC'') Every irreducible polynomial in K[X] is of degree 1.

(AC) Every algebraic extension of K is of degree 1 (in other words, K is relatively algebraically closed in every extension field of K).

Let us first prove the equivalence of the properties (AC), (AC') and (AC''). Clearly (AC) implies (AC). Since every non-constant polynomial of K[X] is divisible by an irreducible polynomial (IV, p. 13, Prop. 13) and every polynomial of degree 1 in K[X] clearly admits a root in K, we see that (AC) implies (AC'). The condition (AC') implies by induction on n, that every polynomial of degree n in K[X] is a product of n polynomials of degree 1 (IV, p. 14, Prop. 1), hence (AC') implies (AC).

It remains to see that (AC) and (AC) are equivalent. If (AC'') holds, every element of an extension field L of K which is algebraic over K is of degree 1 (V, p. 16, Th. 1), hence belongs to K, which establishes (AC). Conversely, let f be an irreducible polynomial of degree n≥1n \geq 1 in K[X]; the quotient algebra K[X]/(f) is of degree n over K and is a field, hence an algebraic extension of degree n of K (V, p. 18, Prop. 2). Now it is clear that (AC) implies (AC'').

Definition 1

A field K is said to be algebraically closed if it possesses the (equivalent) properties (AC), (AC'), (AC), (AC).

\* Example 1. — The field C of complex numbers is algebraically closed (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 100). \*

A field K which is relatively algebraically closed in an extension field E of K is not necessarily algebraically closed (in effect every field is relatively algebraically closed in itself, and there exist fields that are not algebraically closed, for example Q or Fp\mathbf{F}_p \* or R *). However:

Proposition 2

Let Ω\Omega be an algebraically closed field and K a subfield of Ω\Omega. Then the relative algebraic closure Kˉ\bar{K} of K in Ω\Omega is an algebraically closed field.

Let f be a non-constant polynomial in Kˉ[X]⊂Ω[X]\bar{K}[X] \subset \Omega[X]. Since Ω\Omega is algebraically closed, the polynomial f has at least one root in Ω\Omega, and since this root is algebraic over Kˉ\bar{K}, it belongs to Kˉ\bar{K} (V, p. 19, Prop. 4). Therefore Kˉ\bar{K} satisfies (AC').

\* Example 2. — By Prop. 2 the set of all complex numbers that are algebraic over Q (often called briefly algebraic numbers) is an algebraically closed field. \*

Proposition 3

Every algebraically closed field is infinite.

Let K be a finite field and put f(X)=1+∏a∈K(X−a)f(X) = 1 + \prod_{a \in K} (X - a). The polynomial f∈K[X]f \in K[X] is non-constant and f(a)=1f(a) = 1 for each a∈Ka \in K. So the field K does not satisfy (AC') and hence is not algebraically closed.

Theorem 1 (Steinitz)

Let K be a field, E an algebraic extension of K and Ω\Omega an algebraically closed extension of K; then there exists a K-homomorphism of E into R.

By V, p. 13, Scholium, there exists an extension field Ω′\Omega' of Ω\Omega and a K-homomorphism u of E into Ω′\Omega'. Let x∈Ex \in E; since x is algebraic over K, u(x) is algebraic over u(K) and a fortiori over Ω\Omega (V, p. 17, Cor. 2); since Ω\Omega is algebraically closed, we thus have u(x)∈Ou(x) \in O. It follows that uu maps EE into OO.

2. Splitting extensions

Definition 2

Let K be a field and (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I} a family of non-constant polynomials in K[X]K[X]. By a splitting extension of (fi)i(f_i)_i, we understand any extension EE of KK with the following properties :

a) For each i∈Ii \in I, the polynomial fif_i splits in E[X]E[X] into a product of polynomials of degree 1.

b) For each i∈Ii \in I let RiR_i be the set of roots of fif_i in EE, then E=K(⋃i∈IRi)E = K \left( \bigcup_{i \in I} R_i \right).

Sometimes the term « splitting field » is used instead of « splitting extension ».

Remarks. — 1) For each i∈Ii \in I let cic_i be a non-zero element of KK and let fi′=cifif'_i = c_i f_i. Then it is clear that every splitting extension for the family (fi)i(f_i)_i, is also a splitting extension for the family (fi′)i∈I(f'_i)_{i \in I} and conversely. In particular, in studying splitting extensions we may limit ourselves to the case of monic polynomials.

2) Suppose that I is finite and put f=∏i∈Ifif = \prod_{i \in I} f_i. Using the uniqueness of the decomposition of a polynomial into irreducible factors in E[X]E[X] (IV, p. 13, Prop. 13), we can easily show that a splitting extension for the polynomial ff is a splitting extension for the family (fi)i(f_i)_i, and conversely. In other words, the case of a finite family may be reduced to the case of a single polynomial.

3) Let f∈K[X]f \in K[X] be a polynomial of degree ≥1\geq 1 and let EE be a splitting extension of ff. If x1,…,xnx_1, \ldots, x_n are the roots off in EE, we thus have E=K(x1,…,xn)E = K(x_1, \ldots, x_n) and [E:K][E : K] is finite (VV, p. 18, Th. 2); but it may happen that EE is distinct from the subfields K(x1),…,K(xn)K(x_1), \ldots, K(x_n) generated by a single root; this can happen even when ff is irreducible1^1. We note however that when ff is irreducible, the fields K(xi)K(x_i) all have the same degree nn over KK, and whenever EE is equal to one of them, we have [E:K]=n[E : K] = n and hence E=K(x1)=⋯=K(xn)E = K(x_1) = \cdots = K(x_n).

Proposition 4

Let K be a field and (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I} a family of non-constant polynomials in K[X]K[X]; then there exists a splitting extension for the family (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I}.

We may take the polynomials fif_i to be monic (Remark 1). Let i∈Ii \in I and let the degree of fif_i be did_i. By IV, p. 73, Prop. 5 there exists a commutative algebra AA, over KK, not reduced to 0, and elements ξi,1,…,ξi,di\xi_{i,1}, \ldots, \xi_{i,d_i} of AiA_i such that :

a) the algebra AiA_i is generated by (ξi,1,…,ξi,di)(\xi_{i,1}, \ldots, \xi_{i,d_i});

(1) Take for example K=QK = \mathbf{Q} and f=X3−2f = X^3 - 2.

b) we have fi(X)=∏k=1di(X−ξi,k)f_i(X) = \prod_{k=1}^{d_i} (X - \xi_{i,k}) in Ai[X]A_i[X].

Let AA be the tensor product of the family of algebras (Ai)i∈I(A_i)_{i \in I}, and let φi\varphi_i be the canonical homomorphism of AiA_i into AA (III, p. 470). The algebra AA is then commutative and not reduced to 0; by Krull's theorem (I, p. 104), there exists thus a maximal ideal aa in AA and E=A/aE = A/a is an extension of the field KK.

Denote by ψ\psi the canonical homomorphism of AA into EE and put xi,k=ψ(φi(ξi,k))x_{i,k} = \psi(\varphi_i(\xi_{i,k})) for i∈Ii \in I and l≤k≤dil \leq k \leq d_i. Since the algebra AA is generated by ⋃φi(Ai)\bigcup \varphi_i(A_i), the extension EE is generated by the family (xi,k)(x_{i,k}). Further, we have i∈Ii \in I

fi(X)=∏k=1di(X−xi,k) in E[X]. f_i(X) = \prod_{k=1}^{d_i} (X - x_{i,k}) \text{ in } E[X].

Therefore EE is a splitting extension of the family (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I}.

Proposition 5

— *Let K be a field, (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I} a family of non-constant polynomials in K[X]K[X], E an extension of K, and F, F' subextensions of E which are each a splitting extension of (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I}. Then F=F′F = F'.

Let RiR_i be the set of roots of fif_i in E and R=⋃i∈IRiR = \bigcup_{i \in I} R_i. Since fif_i is a product of polynomials of the first degree lying in F[X]F[X], we have Ri⊂FR_i \subset F. By Def. 2, we have F=K(R)F = K(R); in the same way we find that F=K(R)F = K(R).

Corollary

— *Let K be a field, (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I}, a family of non-constant polynomials in K[X]K[X] and F, F' splitting extensions of (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I}. Then there exists a K-isomorphism of F onto F.

This follows from Prop. 5 and V, p. 13, Cor. of Prop. 4.

3. Algebraic closure of a field

Definition 3

— *Let K be a field. By an algebraic closure of K we understand any extension of K which is algebraic and algebraically closed.

Example 1

The field C of complex numbers is an algebraic closure of the field R of real numbers (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 100) \

Example 2

Let K be a field and Ω\Omega an algebraically closed extension of K. If K‾\overline{K} is the relative algebraic closure of K in Ω\Omega, then by V, p. 20, Prop. 2, K is an algebraic closure of K. \* In particular the field of all algebraic numbers (V, p. 20, Ex. 2) is an algebraic closure of the field Q of rational numbers. \

Proposition 6

— *Let Ω\Omega be an extension of a field K. For Ω\Omega to be an algebraic closure of K it is necessary and sufficient that it should be algebraic and that each non-constant polynomial in K[X]K[X] should split in Ω[X]\Omega[X] into a product of factors of degree 1.

The condition is necessary by (AC). Conversely, suppose that Ω\Omega is algebraic over KK and every non-constant polynomial over K[X]K[X] is a product in Ω[X]\Omega[X] of factors of degree 1. Let Ω′\Omega' be an algebraic extension of Ω\Omega and let x∈Ω′x \in \Omega'. Since xx is algebraic over Ω\Omega and Ω\Omega is algebraic over KK, xx is algebraic over KK (V, p. 19, Prop. 3). Let ff be the minimal polynomial of xx over KK. By hypothesis the polynomial f∈K[X]f \in K[X] splits in Ω[X]\Omega[X] into a product of factors of degree 1, whence x∈Ωx \in \Omega. Thus we have Ω′=Ω\Omega' = \Omega and Ω\Omega is algebraically closed because it satisfies (AC).

Remark 1

If Ω\Omega is algebraic over KK and if every non-constant polynomial of K[X]K[X] has a root in Ω\Omega then Ω\Omega is an algebraic closure of KK (V, p. 156, Ex. 20).

Proposition 7

— *Let Ω\Omega be an algebraic extension of a field KK. a) If Ω\Omega is algebraically closed, then every algebraic extension of KK is isomorphic to a subextension of R\mathbf{R}. b) Conversely suppose that every algebraic extension of finite degree of KK is isomorphic to a subextension of Ω\Omega; then Ω\Omega is algebraically closed.

Assertion a) follows from Th. 1 (V, p. 20). Now assume the hypotheses of b) and consider a non-constant polynomial f∈K[X]f \in K[X]. Let E be a splitting field of ff (V, p. 21, Prop. 4); since E is algebraic of finite degree over KK (V, p. 18, Th. 2), we may suppose that E is a subextension of Ω\Omega. Then the polynomial ff is a product of polynomials of degree 1 in Ω[X]\Omega[X] and Prop. 6 shows that Ω\Omega is algebraically closed.

We can now prove the existence and uniqueness (up to isomorphism) of the algebraic closure of a field.

Theorem 2 (Steinitz)

— *Let KK be a field; then there exists an algebraic closure of KK. If Ω\Omega and Ω′\Omega' are two algebraic closures of KK, there exists a KK-isomorphism of Ω\Omega onto Ω′\Omega'.

By Prop. 6 an algebraic closure of KK is nothing other than a splitting extension for the set of all non-constant polynomials in K[X]K[X]. Th. 2 therefore follows from V, p. 21, Prop. 4 and V, p. 22, Cor.

Corollary

— *Let KK and K′K' be two fields, Ω\Omega an algebraic closure of KK and Ω′\Omega' an algebraic closure of K′K'. For every isomorphism uu of KK onto K′K' there exists an isomorphism vv of Ω\Omega onto Ω′\Omega' extending uu.

It is enough to apply Th. 2 to the algebraic closures Ω\Omega and (Ω′,u)(\Omega', u) of KK.

Remark 2

In the notation of the preceding Corollary there exist in general KK-automorphisms of Ω\Omega distinct from the identity. Hence there is in general no uniqueness about the isomorphism vv of Ω\Omega onto Ω′\Omega' extending the isomorphisms uu of KK onto K′K'. For similar reasons there is in general more than one isomorphism of a splitting extension EE onto a splitting extension E′E' for the same family (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I} of polynomials. We recall that by contrast, for the perfect closure we have uniqueness (V, p. 5).

Remark 3

Let K be a field and Ω\Omega an algebraic closure of KK. Then the following construction may be given for a splitting extension for a family (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I} of non-constant polynomials in K[X]K[X]: let RiR_i be the set of roots of fif_i in Ω\Omega and let R=⋃i∈IRiR = \bigcup_{i \in I} R_i. Then K(R)K(R) is the unique subextension of Ω\Omega which is a splitting extension for (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I} (V, p. 22, Prop. 5).

Remark 4

Let K be a finite field and Ω\Omega an algebraic closure of KK. Then Ω\Omega is infinite (V,V, p. 20, Prop. 3); since every extension of finite degree of K is a finite field, Ω\Omega is an algebraic extension of infinite degree of KK.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 4.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.