§ 4. Algebraically closed extensions
1. Algebraically closed fields
Proposition 1
— Let K be a field; then the following properties are equivalent: (AC) Every non-constant polynomial of K[X] splits in K[X] into a product of polynomials of degree 1 (distinct or not). (AC') Every non-constant polynomial of K[X] has at least one root in K. (AC'') Every irreducible polynomial in K[X] is of degree 1.
(AC) Every algebraic extension of K is of degree 1 (in other words, K is relatively algebraically closed in every extension field of K).
Let us first prove the equivalence of the properties (AC), (AC') and (AC''). Clearly (AC) implies (AC). Since every non-constant polynomial of K[X] is divisible by an irreducible polynomial (IV, p. 13, Prop. 13) and every polynomial of degree 1 in K[X] clearly admits a root in K, we see that (AC) implies (AC'). The condition (AC') implies by induction on n, that every polynomial of degree n in K[X] is a product of n polynomials of degree 1 (IV, p. 14, Prop. 1), hence (AC') implies (AC).
It remains to see that (AC) and (AC) are equivalent. If (AC'') holds, every element of an extension field L of K which is algebraic over K is of degree 1 (V, p. 16, Th. 1), hence belongs to K, which establishes (AC). Conversely, let f be an irreducible polynomial of degree in K[X]; the quotient algebra K[X]/(f) is of degree n over K and is a field, hence an algebraic extension of degree n of K (V, p. 18, Prop. 2). Now it is clear that (AC) implies (AC'').
Definition 1
A field K is said to be algebraically closed if it possesses the (equivalent) properties (AC), (AC'), (AC), (AC).
\* Example 1. — The field C of complex numbers is algebraically closed (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 100). \*
A field K which is relatively algebraically closed in an extension field E of K is not necessarily algebraically closed (in effect every field is relatively algebraically closed in itself, and there exist fields that are not algebraically closed, for example Q or \* or R *). However:
Proposition 2
Let be an algebraically closed field and K a subfield of . Then the relative algebraic closure of K in is an algebraically closed field.
Let f be a non-constant polynomial in . Since is algebraically closed, the polynomial f has at least one root in , and since this root is algebraic over , it belongs to (V, p. 19, Prop. 4). Therefore satisfies (AC').
\* Example 2. — By Prop. 2 the set of all complex numbers that are algebraic over Q (often called briefly algebraic numbers) is an algebraically closed field. \*
Proposition 3
Every algebraically closed field is infinite.
Let K be a finite field and put . The polynomial is non-constant and for each . So the field K does not satisfy (AC') and hence is not algebraically closed.
Theorem 1 (Steinitz)
Let K be a field, E an algebraic extension of K and an algebraically closed extension of K; then there exists a K-homomorphism of E into R.
By V, p. 13, Scholium, there exists an extension field of and a K-homomorphism u of E into . Let ; since x is algebraic over K, u(x) is algebraic over u(K) and a fortiori over (V, p. 17, Cor. 2); since is algebraically closed, we thus have . It follows that maps into .
2. Splitting extensions
Definition 2
Let K be a field and a family of non-constant polynomials in . By a splitting extension of , we understand any extension of with the following properties :
a) For each , the polynomial splits in into a product of polynomials of degree 1.
b) For each let be the set of roots of in , then .
Sometimes the term « splitting field » is used instead of « splitting extension ».
Remarks. — 1) For each let be a non-zero element of and let . Then it is clear that every splitting extension for the family , is also a splitting extension for the family and conversely. In particular, in studying splitting extensions we may limit ourselves to the case of monic polynomials.
2) Suppose that I is finite and put . Using the uniqueness of the decomposition of a polynomial into irreducible factors in (IV, p. 13, Prop. 13), we can easily show that a splitting extension for the polynomial is a splitting extension for the family , and conversely. In other words, the case of a finite family may be reduced to the case of a single polynomial.
3) Let be a polynomial of degree and let be a splitting extension of . If are the roots off in , we thus have and is finite (, p. 18, Th. 2); but it may happen that is distinct from the subfields generated by a single root; this can happen even when is irreducible. We note however that when is irreducible, the fields all have the same degree over , and whenever is equal to one of them, we have and hence .
Proposition 4
Let K be a field and a family of non-constant polynomials in ; then there exists a splitting extension for the family .
We may take the polynomials to be monic (Remark 1). Let and let the degree of be . By IV, p. 73, Prop. 5 there exists a commutative algebra , over , not reduced to 0, and elements of such that :
a) the algebra is generated by ;
(1) Take for example and .
b) we have in .
Let be the tensor product of the family of algebras , and let be the canonical homomorphism of into (III, p. 470). The algebra is then commutative and not reduced to 0; by Krull's theorem (I, p. 104), there exists thus a maximal ideal in and is an extension of the field .
Denote by the canonical homomorphism of into and put for and . Since the algebra is generated by , the extension is generated by the family . Further, we have
Therefore is a splitting extension of the family .
Proposition 5
— *Let K be a field, a family of non-constant polynomials in , E an extension of K, and F, F' subextensions of E which are each a splitting extension of . Then .
Let be the set of roots of in E and . Since is a product of polynomials of the first degree lying in , we have . By Def. 2, we have ; in the same way we find that .
Corollary
— *Let K be a field, , a family of non-constant polynomials in and F, F' splitting extensions of . Then there exists a K-isomorphism of F onto F.
This follows from Prop. 5 and V, p. 13, Cor. of Prop. 4.
3. Algebraic closure of a field
Definition 3
— *Let K be a field. By an algebraic closure of K we understand any extension of K which is algebraic and algebraically closed.
Example 1
The field C of complex numbers is an algebraic closure of the field R of real numbers (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 100) \
Example 2
Let K be a field and an algebraically closed extension of K. If is the relative algebraic closure of K in , then by V, p. 20, Prop. 2, K is an algebraic closure of K. \* In particular the field of all algebraic numbers (V, p. 20, Ex. 2) is an algebraic closure of the field Q of rational numbers. \
Proposition 6
— *Let be an extension of a field K. For to be an algebraic closure of K it is necessary and sufficient that it should be algebraic and that each non-constant polynomial in should split in into a product of factors of degree 1.
The condition is necessary by (AC). Conversely, suppose that is algebraic over and every non-constant polynomial over is a product in of factors of degree 1. Let be an algebraic extension of and let . Since is algebraic over and is algebraic over , is algebraic over (V, p. 19, Prop. 3). Let be the minimal polynomial of over . By hypothesis the polynomial splits in into a product of factors of degree 1, whence . Thus we have and is algebraically closed because it satisfies (AC).
Remark 1
If is algebraic over and if every non-constant polynomial of has a root in then is an algebraic closure of (V, p. 156, Ex. 20).
Proposition 7
— *Let be an algebraic extension of a field . a) If is algebraically closed, then every algebraic extension of is isomorphic to a subextension of . b) Conversely suppose that every algebraic extension of finite degree of is isomorphic to a subextension of ; then is algebraically closed.
Assertion a) follows from Th. 1 (V, p. 20). Now assume the hypotheses of b) and consider a non-constant polynomial . Let E be a splitting field of (V, p. 21, Prop. 4); since E is algebraic of finite degree over (V, p. 18, Th. 2), we may suppose that E is a subextension of . Then the polynomial is a product of polynomials of degree 1 in and Prop. 6 shows that is algebraically closed.
We can now prove the existence and uniqueness (up to isomorphism) of the algebraic closure of a field.
Theorem 2 (Steinitz)
— *Let be a field; then there exists an algebraic closure of . If and are two algebraic closures of , there exists a -isomorphism of onto .
By Prop. 6 an algebraic closure of is nothing other than a splitting extension for the set of all non-constant polynomials in . Th. 2 therefore follows from V, p. 21, Prop. 4 and V, p. 22, Cor.
Corollary
— *Let and be two fields, an algebraic closure of and an algebraic closure of . For every isomorphism of onto there exists an isomorphism of onto extending .
It is enough to apply Th. 2 to the algebraic closures and of .
Remark 2
In the notation of the preceding Corollary there exist in general -automorphisms of distinct from the identity. Hence there is in general no uniqueness about the isomorphism of onto extending the isomorphisms of onto . For similar reasons there is in general more than one isomorphism of a splitting extension onto a splitting extension for the same family of polynomials. We recall that by contrast, for the perfect closure we have uniqueness (V, p. 5).
Remark 3
Let K be a field and an algebraic closure of . Then the following construction may be given for a splitting extension for a family of non-constant polynomials in : let be the set of roots of in and let . Then is the unique subextension of which is a splitting extension for (V, p. 22, Prop. 5).
Remark 4
Let K be a finite field and an algebraic closure of . Then is infinite ( p. 20, Prop. 3); since every extension of finite degree of K is a finite field, is an algebraic extension of infinite degree of .
Exercises
See the exercises for § 4.