Bourbaki

Exercise 2, § 1

Algebra, VI

Let E be a lattice with a composition law (x, y) Hxy\mathscr{H} xy (not necessarily associative), such that, for all a ∈ E, the maps x Hax\mathscr{H} ax and x ↦xa\mapsto xa are order-automorphisms of E. Let xax_a (resp. ax_a x) denote the element of E defined by (xa)a=x(x_a)a = x (resp. a(ax)=xa(_a x) = x) and suppose that for each a ∈ E the maps x Hax\mathscr{H} a_x and x Hxa\mathscr{H} _x a are isomorphisms from the ordering of E to the opposite ordering. Show that, for arbitrary x, y, z,

(zinf⁡(x,y))⋅x=(zy)⋅sup⁡(x,y) (z_{\inf(x, y)}) \cdot x = (z_y) \cdot \sup(x, y)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.