Bourbaki

Exercise 25, § 1

Algebra, VI, p. 33

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let I be the semilattice ordered monoid of ideals of a commutative ring A (Ex. 24). For a finite system of congruences x≡ai(ai)x \equiv a_i (a_i) to admit a solution whenever any two of them admit a common solution (that is to say whenever

ai≡aj(ai+aj) a_i \equiv a_j (a_i + a_j)

for every pair of indices i, j), it is necessary and sufficient that each of the laws

(a,b)↦a∩b,(a,b)↦a+b, (a, b) \mapsto a \cap b, (a, b) \mapsto a + b,

in I be distributive over the other ("Chinese remainder theorem"). One may proceed as follows: a) If (a1∩a2)+(a1∩a3)=a1∩(a2+a3)(a_1 \cap a_2) + (a_1 \cap a_3) = a_1 \cap (a_2 + a_3) and if any two of the three congruences x≡ai(ai)x \equiv a_i (a_i) (i=1,2,3i = 1, 2, 3) admit a common solution, then the three congruences have a common solution (let x12x_{12} be a common solution of x≡a1(a1)x \equiv a_1(a_1) and x≡a2(a2)x \equiv a_2(a_2) and let x13x_{13} be a common solution of x≡a1(a1)x \equiv a_1(a_1) and x≡a3(a3)x \equiv a_3(a_3); show that the congruences x=x12(a1∩a2)x = x_{12}(a_1 \cap a_2) and x≡x13(a1∩a3)x \equiv x_{13}(a_1 \cap a_3) have a common solution). b) If any system of three congruences, any two of which have a common solution, admits a common solution, show that the following distributive laws hold

a+(b∩c)−(a∩b)∩(a+c),anda∩(b+c)−(a∩b)+(a∩c). a + (b \cap c) - (a \cap b) \cap (a + c), \quad \text{and} \quad a \cap (b + c) - (a \cap b) + (a \cap c).

(For the first, note that for all x∈(a+b)∩(a+c)x \in (a + b) \cap (a + c), there exists y∈b∩cy \in b \cap c such that y≡x(a)y \equiv x(a); for the second, note that for all x∈a∩(b+c)x \in a \cap (b + c), there exists y∈a∩by \in a \cap b such that y≡x(c)y \equiv x(c).) Note that by a) and b), the second distributive law implies the first (cf. Set Theory, III, p. 217, Ex. 16). c) Prove the « Chinese remainder theorem » by induction on the number of congruences under consideration, by an analogous argument to that of a). d) Translation in the case of principal ideal domains.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.