Bourbaki

Exercise 24, § 1

Tag 03UK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03UK].

Theory of Sets, III, 220

It is set in small type as supplementary.

(a) An ordered set E is said to be branched (on the right) if for each x∈Ex \in E there exist yy, zz in E such that x⩽yx \leqslant y, x⩽zx \leqslant z and the intervals [y,→[[y, \rightarrow[ and [z,→[[z, \rightarrow[ do not intersect. An antidirected set with no maximal elements (Exercise 23) is branched.

(b) Let E be the set of intervals in R\mathbf{R} of the form

[k.2−n,(k+1)2−n](0⩽k<2n),[k.2^{-n}, (k+1)2^{-n}] \quad (0 \leqslant k < 2^n),

ordered by the relation ⊃\supset. Show that E is antidirected and has no maximal elements.

(c) Give an example of a branched set in which there exists no antidirected cofinal subset. (Take the product of the set E defined in (b) with a well-ordered set which contains no countable cofinal subset, and use Exercise 22.)

(d) Give an example of an ordered set E which is not antidirected, but which has an antidirected cofinal subset (note that an ordinal sum ∑ξ∈EFξ\sum_{\xi \in E} F_\xi contains a cofinal subset isomorphic to E). \*

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.