Bourbaki

Exercise 1, § 1

Functions of a Real Variable, II, 79

Let (fα)(f_\alpha) be a set of real functions, defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}, each admitting a strict primitive on II, and forming a directed set for the relation ≤\leq. Let ff be the upper envelope of the family (fα)(f_\alpha); suppose that ff admits a strict primitive on II. Show that if gαg_\alpha (resp. gg) is the primitive of fαf_\alpha (resp. ff) which vanishes at a point x0∈Ix_0 \in I, then gg is the upper envelope of the family (gα)(g_\alpha) on the intersection I∩[x0,+∞[I \cap [x_0, +\infty[ and its lower envelope on the intersection I∩]−∞,x0]I \cap ]-\infty, x_0]. (Restricting to the first of these intervals, show that if uu is the upper envelope of (gα)(g_\alpha) on I∩[x0,+∞[I \cap [x_0, +\infty[ then one has u(x+h)−u(x)≤g(x+h)−g(x)u(x+h) - u(x) \leq g(x+h) - g(x) for h>0h > 0; then prove that, for all α\alpha, one has u(x+h)−u(x)≥gα(x+h)−gα(x)u(x+h) - u(x) \geq g_\alpha(x+h) - g_\alpha(x), and conclude from this last inequality that lim inf⁡h→0+(u(x+h)−u(x))/h≥f(x)\liminf_{h \to 0^+} (u(x+h) - u(x))/h \geq f(x); deduce the proposition from this.)

Give an example of an increasing sequence (fn)(f_n) of continuous functions on an interval II which are uniformly bounded, but whose upper envelope does not admit a strict primitive on II.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.