Bourbaki

§ 1. Derivatives of the exponential and circular functions

1. Derivatives of the exponential functions; the number ee

We know that every continuous homomorphism of the additive group R\mathbf{R} into the multiplicative group R∗\mathbf{R}^* of real numbers ≠0\neq 0 is a function of the form x↦axx \mapsto a^x (called an exponential function) where aa is a number >0> 0 (TG, V, p.11); it is an isomorphism of R\mathbf{R} onto the multiplicative group R+∗\mathbf{R}_+^* of numbers >0> 0 if a≠1a \neq 1, and the inverse isomorphism from R+∗\mathbf{R}_+^* onto R\mathbf{R} is denoted by log⁡ax\log_a x and is called the logarithm to the base aa.

We shall see that the function f(x)=axf(x) = a^x has, for every x∈Rx \in \mathbf{R}, a derivative of the form c.axc.a^x (where clearly c=f′(0)c = f'(0)). This results from the following general theorem:

Theorem 1

Let E be a complete normed algebra over the field R\mathbf{R}, with a unit element e\mathbf{e}, and let f\mathbf{f} be a continuous group homomorphism of the additive group R\mathbf{R} into the multiplicative group G of invertible elements of E. Then the map f\mathbf{f} is differentiable at every x∈Rx \in \mathbf{R}, and

f′(x)=f(x)f′(0). \mathbf{f}'(x) = \mathbf{f}(x)\mathbf{f}'(0).

First we note that, E being a complete algebra, G is open in E (Gen. Top., IX, p. 179, prop. 14). Consider the function g(x)=∫0af(x+t) dtg(x) = \int_0^a \mathbf{f}(x + t)\,dt, where a>0a > 0 is a number which we shall choose later; since f(x+t)=f(x)f(t)\mathbf{f}(x + t) = \mathbf{f}(x)\mathbf{f}(t) by hypothesis, we have g(x)=∫0af(x)f(t) dt=f(x)∫0af(t) dtg(x) = \int_0^a \mathbf{f}(x)\mathbf{f}(t)\,dt = \mathbf{f}(x) \int_0^a \mathbf{f}(t)\,dt (I, p. 6, prop. 3). Let α>0\alpha > 0 be such that the ball ∥x−e∥≤α\|x - \mathbf{e}\| \leq \alpha is contained in G; since f(0)=e\mathbf{f}(0) = \mathbf{e} and f\mathbf{f} is continuous by hypothesis, one can assume that aa is small enough so that ∥f(t)−e∥≤α\|\mathbf{f}(t) - \mathbf{e}\| \leq \alpha on [0,a][0, a]; consequently (II, p. 61, formula (16)) one has

∥1a∫0af(t) dt−e∥≤α, \left\| \frac{1}{a} \int_0^a \mathbf{f}(t)\,dt - \mathbf{e} \right\| \leq \alpha,

and 1a∫0af(t) dt\frac{1}{a} \int_0^a f(t) \, dt belongs to G; in other words, is invertible; so too is b=∫0af(t) dtb = \int_0^a f(t) \, dt and one can write f(x)=g(x)b−1f(x) = g(x)b^{-1}; it is therefore enough to show that g is differentiable; now, by the change of variable x+t=ux + t = u we have g(x)=∫xx+af(u) dug(x) = \int_x^{x+a} f(u) \, du; since f is continuous, g is differentiable for all x∈Rx \in \mathbf{R} (II, p. 56, prop. 3), and

g′(x)=f(x+a)−f(x)=f(x)(f(a)−e). g'(x) = f(x+a) - f(x) = f(x)(f(a) - e).

Hence f′(x)=g′(x)b−1=f(x)cf'(x) = g'(x)b^{-1} = f(x)c, where c=(f(a)−e)b−1c = (f(a) - e)b^{-1}, and clearly f′(0)=cf'(0) = c.

Conversely, one can show, either directly (III, p. 115, exerc. 1), or by means of the theory of linear differential equations (IV, p. 188), that every differentiable map f of R\mathbf{R} into a complete normed algebra E, such that f′(x)=f(x)cf'(x) = f(x)c and f(0)=ef(0) = e, is a homomorphism of the additive group R\mathbf{R} into the multiplicative group G.

Proposition 1

For every number a>0a > 0 and ≠1\neq 1 the exponential function aλa^\lambda admits at every point x∈Rx \in \mathbf{R} a derivative equal to (log⁡ea)aλ(\log_e a)a^\lambda where e is a number >1> 1 (independent of aa).

Applying th. 1 to the case where E is the field R\mathbf{R} itself now shows that aλa^\lambda has a derivative equal to φ(a).aλ\varphi(a).a^\lambda at every point, where φ(a)\varphi(a) is a real number ≠0\neq 0 depending only on aa. Let bb be a second number >0> 0 and ≠1\neq 1; the function bλb^\lambda has a derivative equal to φ(b).bλ\varphi(b).b^\lambda from the above; on the other hand, we have bλ=aλlog⁡abb^\lambda = a^\lambda \log_a b so (I, p. 9, prop. 5) the derivative of bλb^\lambda is equal to log⁡ab.φ(a)bλ\log_a b.\varphi(a)b^\lambda; on comparing these two expressions we obtain

φ(b)=φ(a).log⁡ab. \varphi(b) = \varphi(a).\log_a b.
(2)

One deduces that there is one unique number bb such that φ(b)=1\varphi(b) = 1; by (2) this relation is equivalent to b=a1/φ(a)b = a^{1/\varphi(a)}. It is conventional to denote the real number so obtained by e; from (2) one has φ(a)=log⁡ea\varphi(a) = \log_e a, which completes the proof of prop. 1.

One often writes exp⁡x\exp x instead of exe^x.

The definition of the number e shows that

D(eλ)=eλ D(e^\lambda) = e^\lambda
(3)

which proves that eλe^\lambda is strictly increasing, hence that e>1e > 1.

In §2 (III, p. 105) we shall see how to calculate arbitrarily close approximations to e.

Definition 1

Logarithms to the base e are called Naperian logarithms (or natural logarithms).

We usually omit the base in the notation for the Naperian logarithm. Unless it is stated to the contrary, the notation log⁡x\log x (x>0x > 0) will denote the Naperian logarithm of xx. With this notation, prop. 1 can be written as the identity

D(aλ)=(log⁡a)aλ D(a^\lambda) = (\log a)a^\lambda
(4)

valid for any a>0a > 0 (log⁡a=0\log a = 0 when a=1a = 1).

This relation shows that axa^x has derivatives of every order, and that

Dn(ax)=(log⁡a)nax. D^n(a^x) = (\log a)^n a^x.
(5)

In particular, for a>0a > 0 and ≠1\neq 1 one has D2(ax)>0D^2(a^x) > 0 for all x∈Rx \in \mathbf{R}, and hence axa^x is strictly convex on R\mathbf{R} (I, p. 31, corollary). From this one deduces the following proposition:

Proposition 2 ("geometric mean inequality")

For any numbers* zi>0z_i > 0 (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n) and numbers pi>0p_i > 0 such that ∑i=1npi=1\sum_{i=1}^n p_i = 1, one has

z1p1z2p2⋯znpn≤p1z1+p2z2+⋯+pnzn. z_1^{p_1} z_2^{p_2} \cdots z_n^{p_n} \leq p_1 z_1 + p_2 z_2 + \cdots + p_n z_n.
(6) Moreover, the two sides of (6) are equal only if the ziz_i *are equal.

Let us put zi=exiz_i = e^{x_i}; then the inequality (6) can be written

exp⁡(p1x1+p2x2+⋯+pnxn)≤p1ex1+p2ex2+⋯+pnexn. \exp(p_1 x_1 + p_2 x_2 + \cdots + p_n x_n) \leq p_1 e^{x_1} + p_2 e^{x_2} + \cdots + p_n e^{x_n}.
(7) The proposition thus follows from prop. 1 of I, p. 26 applied to the function exe^x, which is strictly convex on R\mathbf{R}.

One says that the left- (resp. right-) hand side of (6) is the weighted geometric mean (resp. weighted arithmetic mean) of the nn numbers ziz_i relative to the weights pip_i (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n). If pi=1/np_i = 1/n for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n, one calls the corresponding arithmetic and geometric means the ordinary arithmetic and geometric means of the ziz_i. Then the inequality (6) can be written

(z1z2⋯zn)1/n≤1n(z1+z2+⋯+zn). (z_1 z_2 \cdots z_n)^{1/n} \leq \frac{1}{n}(z_1 + z_2 + \cdots + z_n).
(8)

2. Derivative of log⁡ax\log_a x

Since axa^x is strictly monotone on R\mathbf{R} for a≠1a \neq 1, applying the rule for differentiating inverse functions (I, p. 17, prop. 6) gives, for all x>0x > 0

D(log⁡ax)=1xlog⁡a D(\log_a x) = \frac{1}{x \log a}
(9) and in particular
D(log⁡x)=1x. D(\log x) = \frac{1}{x}.
(10)

If uu is a real function admitting a derivative at the point x0x_0 and such that u(x0)>0u(x_0) > 0, then the function log⁡u\log u admits a derivative equal to u′(x0)/u(x0)u'(x_0)/u(x_0) at the point x0x_0. In particular, we have D(log⁡∣x∣)=1/∣x∣=1/xD(\log |x|) = 1/|x| = 1/x if x>0x > 0, and

D(log⁡∣x∣)=−1∣x∣=1x D(\log |x|) = -\frac{1}{|x|} = \frac{1}{x}
if x<0x < 0; in other words, D(log⁡∣x∣)=1/xD(\log |x|) = 1/x for any x≠0x \neq 0. One concludes that if, on an interval II, the real function uu is not zero and admits a finite derivative, then log⁡∣u(x)∣\log |u(x)| admits a derivative equal to u′/uu'/u on II; this derivative is called the logarithmic derivative of uu. It is clear that the logarithmic derivative of ∣u∣α|u|^{\alpha} is αu′/u\alpha u'/u, and that the logarithmic derivative of a product is equal to the sum of the logarithmic derivatives of the factors; these rules often provide the fastest way to calculate the derivative of a function. They give again, in particular, the formula
D(xα)=αxα−1(α an arbitrary real number, x>0) D(x^{\alpha}) = \alpha x^{\alpha-1} \qquad (\alpha \text{ an arbitrary real number, } x > 0)
which has already been shown by another method (II, p. 69).

Example

If uu is a function ≠0\neq 0 on an interval II, and vv is any real function, then log⁡(∣u∣v)=v⋅log⁡∣u∣\log(|u|^v) = v \cdot \log |u|, so if uu and vv are differentiable

1∣u∣vD(∣u∣v)=v′log⁡∣u∣+vu′u. \frac{1}{|u|^v} D(|u|^v) = v' \log |u| + v \frac{u'}{u}.

3. Derivatives of the circular functions; the number π\pi

We have defined, in General Topology (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 106), the continuous homomorphism x↦e(x)x \mapsto \mathbf{e}(x) of the additive group R\mathbf{R} onto the multiplicative group U\mathbf{U} of complex numbers of absolute value 1; this is a periodic function with principal period 1, and e(14)=i\mathbf{e}\left(\frac{1}{4}\right) = i. One knows (loc. cit.) that every continuous homomorphism of R\mathbf{R} onto U\mathbf{U} is of the form x↦e(x/a)x \mapsto \mathbf{e}(x/a), and one puts cos⁡ax=R(e(x/a)),sin⁡ax=I(e(x/a))\cos_a x = \mathscr{R}(\mathbf{e}(x/a)), \sin_a x = \mathscr{I}(\mathbf{e}(x/a)) (trigonometric functions, or circular functions, to base aa); these last functions are continuous maps from R\mathbf{R} into [−1,+1][-1, +1] having principal period aa. We have sin⁡a(x+a/4)=cos⁡ax,cos⁡a(x+a/4)=−sin⁡ax\sin_a(x + a/4) = \cos_a x, \quad \cos_a(x + a/4) = -\sin_a x, and the function sin⁡ax\sin_a x is increasing on the interval [−a/4,a/4][-a/4, a/4].

Proposition 3

The function* e(x)\mathbf{e}(x) has a derivative equal to 2πie(x)2\pi i \mathbf{e}(x) at every point of R\mathbf{R}, where π\pi is a constant >0> 0.

Now, th. 1 of III, p. 51, applied to the case where E is the field C\mathbf{C} of complex numbers, yields the relation e′(x)=e′(0)e(x)\mathbf{e}'(x) = \mathbf{e}'(0) \mathbf{e}(x); moreover, since e(x)\mathbf{e}(x) has constant euclidean norm, e′(x)\mathbf{e}'(x) is orthogonal to e(x)\mathbf{e}(x) (I, p. 7, Example 3); one thus has e′(0)=αi\mathbf{e}'(0) = \alpha i, with α\alpha real. Since sin⁡1x\sin_1 x is increasing on [−14,14][-\frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{4}] its derivative for x=0x = 0 is ⩾0\geqslant 0, so α⩾0\alpha \geqslant 0, and since e(x)e(x) is not constant, α>0\alpha > 0; it is conventional to denote the number α\alpha so obtained by 2π2\pi.

In §2 (III, p. 23) we shall show how one can calculate arbitrarily close approximations to the number π\pi.

We thus have the formula

D(e(xa))=2πiae(xa). D \left( e \left( \frac{x}{a} \right) \right) = \frac{2\pi i}{a} e \left( \frac{x}{a} \right).

One sees that this formula simplifies when a=2πa = 2\pi; this is why one uses the circular functions relative to base 2π2\pi exclusively in Analysis; we agree to omit the base in the notation for these functions; unless mentioned expressly to the contrary, the notations cos⁡x\cos x, sin⁡x\sin x and tan⁡x\tan x denote cos⁡2πx\cos_{2\pi} x, sin⁡2πx\sin_{2\pi} x and tan⁡2πx\tan_{2\pi} x respectively.

With these conventions, and a=2πa = 2\pi, formula (12) can be written

D(cos⁡x+isin⁡x)=cos⁡(x+π2)+isin⁡(x+π2), D(\cos x + i \sin x) = \cos \left( x + \frac{\pi}{2} \right) + i \sin \left( x + \frac{\pi}{2} \right),

which is equivalent to

D(cos⁡x)=−sin⁡x,D(sin⁡x)=cos⁡x, D(\cos x) = -\sin x, \qquad D(\sin x) = \cos x,

from which one deduces

D(tan⁡x)=1+tan⁡2x=1cos⁡2x. D(\tan x) = 1 + \tan^2 x = \frac{1}{\cos^2 x}.

Besides the three circular functions cos⁡x\cos x, sin⁡x\sin x and tan⁡x\tan x one also uses, in numerical work, the three auxiliary functions: cotangent, secant and cosecant, defined by the formulae

cot⁡x=1tan⁡x,sec⁡x=1cos⁡x,cosec⁡x=1sin⁡x. \cot x = \frac{1}{\tan x}, \qquad \sec x = \frac{1}{\cos x}, \qquad \operatorname{cosec} x = \frac{1}{\sin x}.

Recall (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 109) that the angle corresponding to the base 2π2\pi is called the radian.

4. Inverse circular functions

The restriction of the function sin⁡x\sin x to the interval [−π/2,+π/2][-\pi/2, +\pi/2] is strictly increasing; one denotes its inverse by Arc⁡sin⁡x\operatorname{Arc}\sin x, which is thus a strictly increasing continuous map of the interval [−1,+1][-1, +1] onto [−π/2,+π/2][-\pi/2, +\pi/2] (fig. 6). The formula for differentiating inverse functions (I, p. 9, prop. 6) gives the derivative of this function

D(Arc⁡sin⁡x)=1cos⁡(Arc⁡sin⁡x). D(\operatorname{Arc}\sin x) = \frac{1}{\cos(\operatorname{Arc}\sin x)}.

Since −π/2≤Arc⁡sin⁡x≤π/2-\pi/2 \leq \operatorname{Arc}\sin x \leq \pi/2 we have cos⁡(Arc⁡sin⁡x)≥0\cos(\operatorname{Arc}\sin x) \geq 0, and since

sin⁡(Arc⁡sin⁡x)=x, \sin(\operatorname{Arc}\sin x) = x,
we have cos⁡(Arc⁡sin⁡x)=1−x2\cos(\operatorname{Arc}\sin x) = \sqrt{1 - x^2}, from which
D(Arc⁡sin⁡x)=11−x2. \mathrm{D}(\operatorname{Arc}\sin x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - x^2}}.
Likewise the restriction of cos⁡x\cos x to the interval [0,π][0, \pi] is strictly decreasing; one denotes its inverse function by Arc⁡cos⁡x\operatorname{Arc}\cos x, and this a strictly decreasing map of [−1,+1][-1, +1] onto [0,π][0, \pi] (fig. 6). Moreover

!Graph showing y = Arc cos x and y = Arc sin x

Fig. 6

sin⁡(π2−Arc⁡cos⁡x)=cos⁡(Arc⁡cos⁡x)=x \sin \left( \frac{\pi}{2} - \operatorname{Arc}\cos x \right) = \cos(\operatorname{Arc}\cos x) = x
and since −π/2≤π/2−Arc⁡cos⁡x≤π/2-\pi/2 \leq \pi/2 - \operatorname{Arc}\cos x \leq \pi/2, we have
Arc⁡cos⁡x=π2−Arc⁡sin⁡x \operatorname{Arc}\cos x = \frac{\pi}{2} - \operatorname{Arc}\sin x
from which in particular it follows that
D(Arc⁡cos⁡x)=−11−x2. \mathrm{D}(\operatorname{Arc}\cos x) = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - x^2}}.

Finally, the restriction of tan x to the interval ]−π/2, +π/2[ is strictly increasing; one denotes its inverse by Arc tan x, and this is a strictly increasing map from \mathbf{R} onto ]−π/2, +π/2[ (fig. 7); we have

lim⁡x→−∞Arctan⁡x=−π2,lim⁡x→+∞Arctan⁡x=π2, \lim_{x \to -\infty} \operatorname{Arc tan} x = -\frac{\pi}{2}, \quad \lim_{x \to +\infty} \operatorname{Arc tan} x = \frac{\pi}{2},

and, by applying the formula for differentiating inverse functions and formula (15) of III, p. 95, we have

D(Arctan⁡x)=11+x2. \mathrm{D}\left( \operatorname{Arc tan} x \right) = \frac{1}{1 + x^2}.

!Graph showing y = Arc tan x

Fig. 7

5. The complex exponential

We have determined (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 106) all the continuous homomorphisms of the (additive) topological group \mathbf{C} of complex numbers onto the (multiplicative) topological group \mathbf{C}^* of complex numbers ≠ 0; these are the maps

x+iy↦eαx+βye(γx+δy) x + i y \mapsto e^{\alpha x + \beta y} \mathbf{e}(\gamma x + \delta y)

where α,β,γ,δ\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta are four real numbers subject to the single condition αδ−βγ≠0\alpha \delta - \beta \gamma \neq 0. We now propose to determine which of these homomorphisms z↦f(z)z \mapsto f(z) are differentiable on \mathbf{C}. First we remark that it is enough for ff to be differentiable at the point z=0z = 0; indeed, for every point z∈Cz \in \mathbf{C} one has

f(z+h)−f(z)h=f(z)f(h)−1h \frac{f(z + h) - f(z)}{h} = f(z) \frac{f(h) - 1}{h}

if f′(0)f'(0) exists, then so does f′(z)f'(z), and f′(z)=af(z)f'(z) = a f(z), with a=f′(0)a = f'(0). On the other hand, if gg is a second differentiable homomorphism, such that g′(z)=bg(z)g'(z) = b g(z), then g(az/b)=f(z)g(a z / b) = f(z), for one notes immediately that the quotient g(az/b)/f(z)g(a z / b) / f(z) has an everywhere zero derivative and is equal to 1 for z=0z = 0; all the differentiable homomorphisms are thus of the form z↦f(λz)z \mapsto f(\lambda z), where ff is one of them (assuming they exist) and λ\lambda is any (complex) constant.

This being so, if ff is differentiable at the point z=0z = 0 then each of the maps x↦f(x), y↦f(iy)x \mapsto f(x),\ y \mapsto f(iy) of R\mathbf{R} into C\mathbf{C} is necessarily differentiable at the point 00, the first having derivative f′(0)f'(0), the second if′(0)if'(0). Now the derivatives of the maps x↦eαxe(γx), y↦eβye(δy)x \mapsto e^{\alpha x} \mathbf{e}(\gamma x),\ y \mapsto e^{\beta y} \mathbf{e}(\delta y) at the point 00 are respectively equal to α+2πiγ\alpha + 2\pi i \gamma and β+2πiδ\beta + 2\pi i \delta, from which β=−2πγ\beta = -2\pi \gamma and α=2πδ\alpha = 2\pi \delta; these conditions are, in particular, satisfied by the homomorphism x+iy↦eze(y/2π)x + iy \mapsto e^z \mathbf{e}(y/2\pi), which we shall denote provisionally by f0f_0. We shall now show that f0f_0 is actually differentiable at the point z=0z = 0.

It is clear that x↦f0(x)x \mapsto f_0(x) and y↦f0(iy)y \mapsto f_0(iy) have derivatives of every order; in particular, Taylor's formula of order 1 applied to these functions shows that for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is an r>0r > 0 such that, if one puts

f0(x)=1+x+φ(x)x,f0(iy)=1+iy+ψ(y)y, f_0(x) = 1 + x + \varphi(x)x,\qquad f_0(iy) = 1 + iy + \psi(y)y,

then the conditions ∣x∣≤r, ∣y∣≤r|x| \leq r,\ |y| \leq r imply that ∣φ(x)∣≤ε|\varphi(x)| \leq \varepsilon and ∣ψ(y)∣≤ε|\psi(y)| \leq \varepsilon; this being so, we have f0(x+iy)=f0(x)f0(iy)=1+(x+iy)+θ(x, y)f_0(x + iy) = f_0(x)f_0(iy) = 1 + (x + iy) + \theta(x,\ y) with

θ(x, y)=(i+φ(x)ψ(y))xy+(1+x)yψ(y)+(1+iy)xφ(x); \theta(x,\ y) = (i + \varphi(x)\psi(y))xy + (1 + x)y\psi(y) + (1 + iy)x\varphi(x);

for ∣z∣≤r|z| \leq r we have ∣x∣≤r|x| \leq r and ∣y∣≤r|y| \leq r, whence

∣θ(x, y)∣≤(1+ε2)∣z∣2+2ε∣z∣(1+∣z∣) |\theta(x,\ y)| \leq (1 + \varepsilon^2)|z|^2 + 2\varepsilon|z|(1 + |z|)

which proves that the quotient f0(z)−1−zz\frac{f_0(z) - 1 - z}{z} tends to 0 with zz, that is to say, the function f0f_0 admits a derivative equal to 1 at the point z=0z = 0. The above thus proves that, for all z∈Cz \in \mathbf{C},

D(f0(z))=f0(z). D(f_0(z)) = f_0(z).

This property establishes the connection between f0f_0 and the function eze^z, which is moreover the restriction of f0f_0 to the real axis; for this reason we make the following definition:

Definition 2 The homomorphism x+iy↦eze(y/2π)x + iy \mapsto e^z \mathbf{e}(y/2\pi) of C\mathbf{C} onto C∗\mathbf{C}^* is called the complex exponential; its value at an arbitrary complex number zz is denoted by eze^z or exp⁡z\exp z.

6. Properties of the function eze^z

The fact that z↦ezz \mapsto e^z is a homomorphism of C\mathbf{C} onto C∗\mathbf{C}^* may be expressed by the identities

ez+z′=ezez′,e0=1.e−z=1/ez. e^{z+z'} = e^z e^{z'},\qquad e^0 = 1.\qquad e^{-z} = 1/e^z.

By definition, one has, for every z=x+iyz = x + iy,

ex+iy=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y) e^{x+iy} = e^x (\cos y + i \sin y)

and since eλ>0e^{\lambda} > 0 one sees that eze^z has absolute value eλe^{\lambda} and amplitude yy (modulo 2π2\pi).

In particular, def. 2 (III, p. 98) gives

e(x)=e2πix \mathbf{e}(x) = e^{2\pi i x}
which permits us to write the formulae defining cos⁡x\cos x and sin⁡x\sin x in the form
cos⁡x=12(eix+e−ix),sin⁡x=12i(eix−e−ix) \cos x = \frac{1}{2} (e^{i x} + e^{-i x}), \qquad \sin x = \frac{1}{2i} (e^{i x} - e^{-i x})
(Euler’s formulae).

Since 2π2\pi is the principal period of e(y/2π)\mathbf{e}(y/2\pi), 2πi2\pi i is the principal period of eze^z; in other words, the group of periods of eze^z is the set of numbers 2nπi2n\pi i, where nn runs through Z\mathbf{Z}.

Finally, formula (21) of III, p. 98 can be written

D(ez)=ez \mathrm{D}(e^z) = e^z
whence, for every complex number aa
D(eaz)=a eaz. \mathrm{D}(e^{a z}) = a\, e^{a z}.

Remark

If, in formula (27), one restricts the function eaze^{a z} (aa complex) to the real axis, one again obtains, for xx real,

D(eax)=a eax. \mathrm{D}(e^{a x}) = a\, e^{a x}.
This formula allows us to calculate a primitive for each of the functions eαxcos⁡βxe^{\alpha x} \cos \beta x, eαxsin⁡βxe^{\alpha x} \sin \beta x (α\alpha and β\beta real); indeed we have e(α+iβ)x=eαxcos⁡βx+ieαxsin⁡βxe^{(\alpha + i \beta)x} = e^{\alpha x} \cos \beta x + i e^{\alpha x} \sin \beta x, so, by (28)
D(R(1α+iβ e(α+iβ)x))=eαxcos⁡βx \mathrm{D}\left( \mathscr{R}\left( \frac{1}{\alpha + i \beta}\, e^{(\alpha + i \beta)x} \right) \right) = e^{\alpha x} \cos \beta x
D(I(1α+iβ e(α+iβ)x))=eαxsin⁡βx. \mathrm{D}\left( \mathscr{I}\left( \frac{1}{\alpha + i \beta}\, e^{(\alpha + i \beta)x} \right) \right) = e^{\alpha x} \sin \beta x.
In the same way one reduces the evaluation of a primitive of xneαxcos⁡βxx^n e^{\alpha x} \cos \beta x, or of xneαxsin⁡βxx^n e^{\alpha x} \sin \beta x (n an integer >0> 0) to that of a primitive of xne(α+iβ)xx^n e^{(\alpha + i \beta)x}; now, the formula for integration by parts of order n+1n + 1 (II, p. 60, formula (11)) shows that a primitive of this last function is
e(α+iβ)x[xnα+iβ−nxn−1(α+iβ)2+n(n−1)xn−2(α+iβ)3+⋯+(−1)nn!(α+iβ)n+1]. e^{(\alpha + i \beta)x} \left[ \frac{x^n}{\alpha + i \beta} - \frac{n x^{n-1}}{(\alpha + i \beta)^2} + \frac{n(n-1)x^{n-2}}{(\alpha + i \beta)^3} + \cdots + (-1)^n \frac{n!}{(\alpha + i \beta)^{n+1}} \right].
By Euler’s formulae one can on the other hand express every positive integral power of cos⁡x\cos x or of sin⁡x\sin x as a linear combination of exponentials eipxe^{ip x} (pp a positive or negative integer). By formula (28) one can thus express a primitive of a function of the form xneαx(cos⁡βx)′(sin⁡γx)sx^n e^{\alpha x} (\cos \beta x)' (\sin \gamma x)^s as a linear combination of functions of the form xpeαxcos⁡λxx^p e^{\alpha x} \cos \lambda x and xpeαxsin⁡μxx^p e^{\alpha x} \sin \mu x and (n,p,r,sn, p, r, s integers, α,β,γ,λ,μ\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \lambda, \mu real).

Example

One has

sin⁡2nx=(−1)n22n(eix−e−ix)2n=(−1)n22n(e2nix−(2n1)e(2n−2)ix+⋯+e−2nix) \sin^{2n} x = \frac{(-1)^n}{2^{2n}} \left( e^{i x} - e^{-i x} \right)^{2n} = \frac{(-1)^n}{2^{2n}} \left( e^{2n i x} - \binom{2n}{1} e^{(2n-2)i x} + \cdots + e^{-2n i x} \right)

whence

∫01sin⁡2nt dt=(−1)n22n(1nsin⁡2nx−(2n1)1n−1sin⁡(2n−2)x+⋯  \int_0^1 \sin^{2n} t \, dt = \frac{(-1)^n}{2^{2n}} \left( \frac{1}{n} \sin 2n x - \binom{2n}{1} \frac{1}{n-1} \sin(2n-2)x + \cdots \right.
+(−1)n−1(2nn−1)sin⁡2x+(−1)n(2nn)x) \left. + (-1)^{n-1} \binom{2n}{n-1} \sin 2x + (-1)^n \binom{2n}{n} x \right)

and in particular

∫0π/2sin⁡2nt dt=(2nn)122nπ2=1.3.5…(2n−1)2.4.6…2nπ2. \int_0^{\pi/2} \sin^{2n} t \, dt = \binom{2n}{n} \frac{1}{2^{2n}} \frac{\pi}{2} = \frac{1.3.5 \ldots (2n-1)}{2.4.6 \ldots 2n} \frac{\pi}{2}.
(29)

7. The complex logarithm

Let B be the "strip" formed by the points z=x+iyz = x + i y such that −π≤y<π-\pi \leq y < \pi; the function eze^z takes each of its values once and only once on B; in other words, z↦ezz \mapsto e^z is a bijective continuous map of B onto C∗\mathbf{C}^*; the image under this map of the (half-open) segment x=x0, −π≤y<πx = x_0,\ -\pi \leq y < \pi is the circle ∣z∣=ex0|z| = e^{x_0}; the image of the line y=y0y = y_0 is the (open) half-line defined by Am(z)=y0\mathrm{Am}(z) = y_0 (mod. 2π2\pi). The image under z↦ezz \mapsto e^z of the interior B˙\dot{B} of B, that is, of the set of z∈Cz \in \mathbf{C} such that ∣I(z)∣<π|\mathscr{I}(z)| < \pi, is the complement F of the (closed) negative real half-axis in C\mathbf{C}; if one agrees to denote by Am(z)\mathrm{Am}(z) the measure of the amplitude of zz which belongs to [−π,π[[-\pi, \pi[, then the set F can be defined by the relations −π<Am(z)<π-\pi < \mathrm{Am}(z) < \pi. Since z↦ezz \mapsto e^z is a strict homomorphism of C\mathbf{C} onto C∗\mathbf{C}^* the image under this map of any open subset of B (so of C\mathbf{C}) is an open set in C∗\mathbf{C}^* (so in F); in other words, the restriction of z↦ezz \mapsto e^z to B is a homeomorphism of B˙\dot{B} onto F. We denote by z↦log⁡zz \mapsto \log z the homeomorphism of F onto B which is the inverse of the latter; for a complex number z∈Fz \in F, log⁡z\log z is called the principal value of the logarithm of zz. If z=x+iyz = x + i y and log⁡z=u+iv\log z = u + i v then x+iy=eu+ivx + i y = e^{u+i v}, whence eu=∣z∣e^u = |z|, and since −π<v<π-\pi < v < \pi, we have v=Am(z)v = \mathrm{Am}(z). Moreover, we have tan⁡(v+π/2)=−x/y\tan(v + \pi/2) = -x/y if y≠0y \neq 0; thus we can write

{u=log⁡∣z∣=12log⁡(x2+y2)v=π2−Arctan⁡xyif y>0v=0if y=0v=−π2−Arctan⁡xyif y<0. \begin{cases} u = \log |z| = \frac{1}{2} \log(x^2 + y^2) \\ v = \frac{\pi}{2} - \mathrm{Arc}\tan \frac{x}{y} & \text{if } y > 0 \\ v = 0 & \text{if } y = 0 \\ v = -\frac{\pi}{2} - \mathrm{Arc}\tan \frac{x}{y} & \text{if } y < 0. \end{cases}
(30)

It is clear that log⁡z\log z is the extension to F of the function log⁡x\log x defined on the positive open real half-axis R+∗\mathbf{R}_+^*. If z, z′z,\ z' are two points of F such that zz′zz' is not real negative, we have log⁡(zz′)=log⁡z+log⁡z′+2επi\log(zz') = \log z + \log z' + 2\varepsilon \pi i, where ε=+1, −1\varepsilon = +1,\ -1 or 0 depending on the values of Am(z)\mathrm{Am}(z) and Am(z′)\mathrm{Am}(z').

We note that at the points of the negative real half-axis the function log⁡z\log z has no limit; to be precise, if xx tends to x0<0x_0 < 0 and if yy tends to 0 remaining > 0 (resp. < 0), then log⁡z\log z tends to log⁡∣x0∣+πi\log |x_0| + \pi i (resp. log⁡∣x0∣−πi\log |x_0| - \pi i); when zz tends to 0, ∣log⁡z∣|\log z| increases indefinitely.

We shall see later how the theory of analytic functions allows us to extend the function log⁡z\log z, and to define the complex logarithm in full generality.

Since log⁡z\log z is the inverse homeomorphism of eze^z, the formula for differentiating inverse functions (I, p. 9, prop. 6) shows that log⁡z\log z is differentiable at every point z∈Fz \in \mathbf{F}, and that

D(log⁡z)=1elog⁡z=1z \mathrm{D}(\log z) = \frac{1}{e^{\log z}} = \frac{1}{z}
a formula which generalizes formula (10) of III, p. 93.

8. Primitives of rational functions

Formula (31) allows us to evaluate the primitive of an arbitrary rational function r(x)r(x) of a real variable xx, with real or complex coefficients. We know (A.VII.7) that such a function can be written (in unique manner) as a finite sum of terms, which are:

a) either of the form axpax^p (pp an integer ⩾0\geqslant 0, aa a complex number); b) or of the form a/(x−b)ma/(x-b)^m (mm an integer ⩾0\geqslant 0, aa and bb complex numbers).

Now it is easy to obtain a primitive of each of these terms: a) a primitive of axpax^p is axp+1p+1a \frac{x^{p+1}}{p+1}; b) if m>1m > 1 a primitive of a/(x−b)ma/(x-b)^m is a(1−m)(x−b)m−1\frac{a}{(1-m)(x-b)^{m-1}}; c) finally, from formulae (10) (III, p. 93) and (31) (III, p. 101), a primitive of ax−b\frac{a}{x-b} is alog⁡∣x−b∣a \log |x-b| if bb is real, alog⁡(x−b)a \log(x-b) if bb is complex. In the last case, if b=p+iqb = p + iq, one has furthermore (III, p. 100, formulae (30))

log⁡(x−b)=log⁡(x−p)2+q2+iArctan⁡x−pq±iπ2. \log(x-b) = \log \sqrt{(x-p)^2 + q^2} + i \operatorname{Arc tan} \frac{x-p}{q} \pm i \frac{\pi}{2}.

We postpone the examination of more practical methods for explicitly determining a primitive of a rational function given explicitly to the part of this work dedicated to Numerical Calculus.

One can reduce to the evaluation of a primitive of a rational function:

1° the evaluation of a primitive of a function of the form r(eax)r(e^{a x}), where rr is a rational function and aa a real number; indeed by the change of variable u=eaxu = e^{a x} one reduces to finding a primitive for r(u)/ur(u)/u;

2° the evaluation of a primitive of a function of the form f(sin⁡ax,cos⁡ax)f(\sin a x, \cos a x), where ff is a rational function of two variables and aa is a real number; the change of variables u=tan⁡(ax/2)u = \tan(a x/2) reduces this to finding a primitive for

21+u2∫(2u1+u2,1−u21+u2). \frac{2}{1 + u^2} \int \left( \frac{2u}{1 + u^2}, \frac{1 - u^2}{1 + u^2} \right).

9. Complex circular functions; hyperbolic functions

Euler’s formulae (25) (III, p. 99) and the definition of eze^z for every complex zz allow us to extend to C\mathbf{C} the functions cos⁡x\cos x and sin⁡x\sin x defined on R\mathbf{R}, by putting, for all z∈Cz \in \mathbf{C}

cos⁡z=12(eiz+e−iz),sin⁡z=12i(eiz−e−iz) \cos z = \frac{1}{2} (e^{i z} + e^{-i z}), \qquad \sin z = \frac{1}{2i} (e^{i z} - e^{-i z})
(cf. III, p. 119, exerc. 19).

These functions are periodic with principal period 2π2 \pi; that is, one has cos⁡(z+π/2)=−sin⁡z,sin⁡(z+π/2)=cos⁡z\cos(z + \pi/2) = -\sin z, \sin(z + \pi/2) = \cos z; one may also verify the identities

cos⁡2z+sin⁡2z=1cos⁡(z+z′)=cos⁡zcos⁡z′−sin⁡zsin⁡z′sin⁡(z+z′)=sin⁡zcos⁡z′+cos⁡zsin⁡z′. \cos^2 z + \sin^2 z = 1 \\ \cos(z + z') = \cos z \cos z' - \sin z \sin z' \\ \sin(z + z') = \sin z \cos z' + \cos z \sin z'.

More generally, every algebraic identity between circular functions for real variables remains true when one gives these variables arbitrary complex values (III, p. 119, exerc. 18).

One puts tan⁡z=sin⁡z/cos⁡z\tan z = \sin z / \cos z if z≠(2k+1)π/2z \neq (2k + 1)\pi/2 and cot⁡z=cos⁡z/sin⁡z\cot z = \cos z / \sin z if z≠kπz \neq k \pi; these are periodic functions with principal period π\pi.

Formula (27) (III, p. 99) shows that cos⁡z\cos z and sin⁡z\sin z are differentiable on C\mathbf{C}, and that

D(cos⁡z)=−sin⁡z,D(sin⁡z)=cos⁡z. \mathrm{D}(\cos z) = -\sin z, \qquad \mathrm{D}(\sin z) = \cos z.

For z=ixz = i x (xx real), the formulae (32) give

cos⁡ix=12(ei+e−i),sin⁡ix=i2(ei−e−i). \cos i x = \frac{1}{2} (e^i + e^{-i}), \qquad \sin i x = \frac{i}{2} (e^i - e^{-i}).

It is convenient to have a specific notation for the real functions thus introduced; we put

{cosh⁡x=12(ex+e−x)(hyperbolic cosine of x)sinh⁡x=12(ex−e−x)(hyperbolic sine of x)tanh⁡x=sinh⁡xcosh⁡x=ex−e−xex+e−x(hyperbolic tangent of x) \begin{cases} \cosh x = \frac{1}{2} (e^x + e^{-x}) & \text{(hyperbolic cosine of } x \text{)} \\ \sinh x = \frac{1}{2} (e^x - e^{-x}) & \text{(hyperbolic sine of } x \text{)} \\ \tanh x = \frac{\sinh x}{\cosh x} = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{e^x + e^{-x}} & \text{(hyperbolic tangent of } x \text{)} \end{cases}

One thus has, for every real xx

cos⁡ix=cosh⁡x,sin⁡ix=isinh⁡x. \cos i x = \cosh x, \quad \sin i x = i \sinh x.

From every identity between circular functions in a certain number of complex numbers zkz_k (1≤k≤n1 \leq k \leq n) one can deduce an identity for the hyperbolic functions, by replacing zkz_k by ixki x_k (xkx_k real, 1≤k≤n1 \leq k \leq n) and using the formulae (34); for instance one has

cosh⁡2x−sinh⁡2x=1 \cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x = 1
cosh⁡(x+x′)=cosh⁡xcosh⁡x′+sinh⁡xsinh⁡x′ \cosh(x + x') = \cosh x \cosh x' + \sinh x \sinh x'
sinh⁡(x+x′)=sinh⁡xcosh⁡x′−cosh⁡xsinh⁡x′. \sinh(x + x') = \sinh x \cosh x' - \cosh x \sinh x'.

The hyperbolic functions allow us to express the real and imaginary parts of cos⁡z\cos z and sin⁡z\sin z for z=x+iyz = x + i y, since

cos⁡(x+iy)=cos⁡xcos⁡iy−sin⁡xsin⁡iy=cos⁡xcosh⁡y−isin⁡xsinh⁡y \cos(x + i y) = \cos x \cos i y - \sin x \sin i y = \cos x \cosh y - i \sin x \sinh y
sin⁡(x+iy)=sin⁡xcos⁡iy+cos⁡xsin⁡iy=sin⁡xcosh⁡y+icos⁡xsinh⁡y. \sin(x + i y) = \sin x \cos i y + \cos x \sin i y = \sin x \cosh y + i \cos x \sinh y.

Finally, one has

D(cosh⁡x)=sinh⁡x,D(sinh⁡x)=cosh⁡x,D(tanh⁡x)=1−tanh⁡2x=1cosh⁡2x. D(\cosh x) = \sinh x, \quad D(\sinh x) = \cosh x, \quad D(\tanh x) = 1 - \tanh^2 x = \frac{1}{\cosh^2 x}.

Since cosh⁡x>0\cosh x > 0 for all xx one deduces that sinh⁡x\sinh x is strictly increasing on R\mathbf{R}; since sinh⁡0=0\sinh 0 = 0, it follows that sinh⁡x\sinh x has the same sign as xx. In consequence cosh⁡x\cosh x is strictly decreasing for x≤0x \leq 0, strictly increasing for x≥0x \geq 0, finally, tanh⁡x\tanh x is strictly increasing on R\mathbf{R}. Moreover

lim⁡x→−∞sinh⁡x=−∞,lim⁡x→+∞sinh⁡x=+∞ \lim_{x \to -\infty} \sinh x = -\infty, \qquad \lim_{x \to +\infty} \sinh x = +\infty
lim⁡x→−∞cosh⁡x=lim⁡x→+∞cosh⁡x=+∞ \lim_{x \to -\infty} \cosh x = \lim_{x \to +\infty} \cosh x = +\infty
lim⁡x→−∞tanh⁡x=−1,lim⁡x→+∞tanh⁡x=+1(fig. 8 and 9). \lim_{x \to -\infty} \tanh x = -1, \qquad \lim_{x \to +\infty} \tanh x = +1 \qquad \text{(fig. 8 and 9)}.

Sometimes we write Arg⁡sinh⁡x\operatorname{Arg} \sinh x for the inverse function of sinh⁡x\sinh x, which is a strictly increasing map from R\mathbf{R} onto R\mathbf{R}: this function can also be expressed in terms of the logarithm, since from the relation x=sinh⁡y=12(ey−e−y)x = \sinh y = \frac{1}{2}(e^y - e^{-y}) we deduce that e2y−2xey−1=0e^{2y} - 2x e^y - 1 = 0, and since ey>0e^y > 0, we have ey=x+x2+1e^y = x + \sqrt{x^2 + 1}, that is to say

Arg⁡sinh⁡x=log⁡(x+x2+1). \operatorname{Arg} \sinh x = \log \left( x + \sqrt{x^2 + 1} \right).

Similarly, we denote by Arg⁡cosh⁡x\operatorname{Arg} \cosh x the inverse of the restriction of cosh⁡x\cosh x to [0,+∞[[0, +\infty[; this map is strictly increasing from ]1,+∞[]1, +\infty[ onto ]0,+∞[]0, +\infty[; one shows as above that

Arg⁡cosh⁡x=log⁡(x+x2−1). \operatorname{Arg} \cosh x = \log \left( x + \sqrt{x^2 - 1} \right).

Finally, we denote by Arg tanh xx the inverse function of tanh xx, which is a strictly increasing map from ]−1,+1-1, +1 [ onto R\mathbf{R}; one has, moreover,

Arg⁡tanh⁡x=12log⁡1+x1−x. \operatorname{Arg} \tanh x = \frac{1}{2} \log \frac{1 + x}{1 - x}.

Remark

For complex zz one sometimes writes

cosh⁡z=12(ez+e−z)=cos⁡izsinh⁡z=12(ez−e−z)=−isin⁡iz. \cosh z = \frac{1}{2} (e^z + e^{-z}) = \cos iz \\ \sinh z = \frac{1}{2} (e^z - e^{-z}) = -i \sin iz.

These functions thus extend to C\mathbf{C} the hyperbolic functions defined on R\mathbf{R}.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 1.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.