Bourbaki

Exercise 13, § 1

Functions of a Real Variable, IV, 202

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

a) Let I = [t0,t0+c][t_0, t_0 + c] and let ω\omega be a continuous real function, ≥0\geq 0, defined on I×RI \times \mathbf{R}. Let S be a ball with centre x0x_0 in a complete normed space E, and let f be a continuous map from I×SI \times S into E such that for any t∈It \in I, x1∈Sx_1 \in S and x2∈Sx_2 \in S one has ∥f(t,x1)−f(t,x2)∥≤ω(t,∥x1−x2∥)\|f(t, x_1) - f(t, x_2)\| \leq \omega(t, \|x_1 - x_2\|). Let u and v be two integrals of x′=f(t,x)x' = f(t, x) defined on I, with values in S, such that u(t0)=x1, v(t0)=x2u(t_0) = x_1,\ v(t_0) = x_2; let w be the maximal integral (exerc. 10) of z′=ω(t,z)z' = \omega(t, z) corresponding to the point (t0,∥x1−x2∥)(t_0, \|x_1 - x_2\|), assumed to be defined on I; show that, on I, one has ∥u(t)−v(t)∥≤w(t)\|u(t) - v(t)\| \leq w(t). (Let w(t,ε)w(t, \varepsilon) be the maximal integral of z′=ω(t,z)+εz' = \omega(t, z) + \varepsilon corresponding to the point (t0,∥x1−x2∥)(t_0, \|x_1 - x_2\|), where ε>0\varepsilon > 0 is sufficiently small. Show that ∥u(t)−v(t)∥≤w(t,ε)\|u(t) - v(t)\| \leq w(t, \varepsilon) for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, arguing by contradiction.)

b) In the statement of the hypotheses of a), replace I by the interval I′=]t0−c,t0]I' = ]t_0 - c, t_0]. Show that if w is the minimal integral on this interval of z′=ω(t,z)z' = \omega(t, z) corresponding to the point (t0,∥x1−x2∥)(t_0, \|x_1 - x_2\|), then ∥u(t)−v(t)∥≥w(t)\|u(t) - v(t)\| \geq w(t) on I' (same method).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.