Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
a) Let ω(t,z) be a continuous real function, ≥0, defined for 0<t≤a and z≥0. Suppose that z=0 is the only integral of z′=ω(t,z) defined for 0<t≤a and such that limt→0z(t)=0 and limt→0z(t)/t=0. Let I = [t0,t0+a[, let S be a ball with centre x0 in E, and f a map from I×S into E, such that for any t∈I, x1∈S and x2∈S one has ∥f(t,x1)−f(t,x2)∥≤ω(∣t−t0∣,∥x1−x2∥). Show that, on an interval with left-hand endpoint t0 contained in I, the equation x′=f(t,x) can have only one solution u such that u(t0)=x0. (Argue by contradiction: if v is a second integral of x′=f(t,x), bound ∥u(t)−v(t)∥ below on an interval with left-hand endpoint t0, with the help of exerc. 13 b), and thus obtain a contradiction.)
Apply to the case where ω(t,z)=k(z/t) with 0≤k<1 (cf. IV, p. 200, exerc. 8).
b) The result of a) applies for ω(t,z)=z/t; but show by an example in this case that if u,v are two integrals to within ε of x′=f(t,x), equal to x0 at the point t0, it is not possible to bound ∥u(t)−v(t)∥ above by a number depending only on t (and not on the function f). (Take for f a continuous map of R+×R into R, equal to x/t for t≥α and for 0<t<α and ∣x∣≤t2/(α−t), and independent of x for the other points (t,x).)
c) Let θ be a continuous real function, ≥0 on the interval [0,a]. Show that if the integral ∫0atθ(t)dt converges then the result of a) applies for ω(t,z)=t1+θ(t)z; on the other hand, if ∫0atθ(t)dt is infinite, give an example of a continuous function f such that ∥f(t,x1)−f(t,x2)∥≤∣t−t0∣1+θ(∣t−t0∣)∥x1−x2∥, but such that the equation x′=f(t,x) has infinitely many integrals equal to x0 at the point t0 (method similar to that of b) ).