For every integer n>0 let n=∑k=0∞εk2k be the dyadic expansion of n (εk is an integer, zero for all but a finite number of indices, 0≤εk≤1). Put
α(n)=k=0∑∞εk,A1(n)=j=1∑nα(j),A2(n)=j=1∑nα(α(j)).
a) Prove the formula A1(n)=∑k=0∞(k+2)εk2k−1. Deduce the formula
A1(n)=2nlog2logn+o(nloglogn)
as n grows indefinitely (decompose the sum which expresses A1(n) into two parts, the index k varying from 0 to μ(n) in the first sum, from μ(n) to n1 in the second, where n1 is the largest of the numbers k such that εk=0 and μ(n) is chosen suitably; bound the first sum using prop. 6 of V, p. 239, and then estimate the difference between the second sum and n1n/2.
b) Establish the relation
j=0∑2m−1f(α(j))=k=0∑m(km)f(k) f being an arbitrary function defined on
N (for a given
k consider the number of
j<2m such that
α(j)=k).
c) For m=2r−1 show that α(m−j)+α(j)=r. Deduce from this and from b) that
A2(2m)=r2m−1∼2log22mloglog2m.
d) For m=2r show that
A2(2m)=2A2(2m−1)+2m−1−j=0∑m−1(jm−1)Δ(j+1) where we have put
α(n+1)−α(n)=1−Δ(n+1) for all
n (use
b) and the relation
α(2k+r)=α(r)+1 for
r<2k). Show that
∑j=0m−1(jm−1)Δ(j+1)≤rm−2 (remark that
Δ(j+1)=0 if
j is even, and
Δ(j+1)≤logj/log2 for all
j). Deduce, with the help of c), that
A2(2m)≥23r2m−1≥232log22mloglog2m. Conclude from c) and this relation that
A2(n) is not equivalent to any (H) function as
n tends to
+∞.