§ 3. Bounds for the remainder in the euler-maclaurin summation formula
1. Bounds for the remainder in the euler-maclaurin summation formula
The estimate obtained in (16) for the Bernoulli polynomials on the interval [0,1] allows one to estimate the remainder Tp(x,n) in the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula (VI, p. 282, formula (39)) easily:
where B2p+1(t) is the periodic function of period 1 equal to B2p+1(t) on the interval [0,1[. The formula (16) of VI, p. 288, shows that
∣B2p+1(t)∣≤4e2π(2π)2p+1(2p+1)!
(3)
for all t∈R, and applying the mean value formula gives the estimate
∣Tp(x,n)∣≤(2π)2p+14e2π∫xx+n+1∣f(2p+1)(t)∣dt
(4)
for Tp(x,n).
2. Application to asymptotic expansions
The Euler-Maclaurin formula allows one to give a more complete solution (in the most important cases) to the problem treated in V, p. 238 to 242, that of obtaining an asymptotic expansion of the partial sum sn=∑m=0ng(m) (resp. of the remainder rn=∑m=n+1∞g(m)), where g is a scalar function, >0, monotone, defined on [0,+∞[.
We shall restrict ourselves to the case where g is an (H) function (V, p. 252), of order 0 relative to ex; in other words, one has the relation g′≪g; from this relation one deduces g(k+1)≪g(k) for every integer k>0 such that none of the derivatives g(h) of order h≤k is equivalent to a constant (V, p. 232, prop. 7). Let p be an integer such that none of the derivatives g(h) of order h≤2p is equivalent to a constant. First we assume that the series with general term g(n) has infinite sum, and distinguish several cases:
1. ∣g(2p−1)(n)∣ tends to +∞ with n; we have the same, by the hypothesis, for ∣g(2k−1)(n)∣ for 1≤k≤p; further, since g(2p+1) is monotone on a neighbourhood of +∞, the formula (4) of VI, p. 289, gives Tp(0,n)=O(g(2p)(n+1))=o(g(2p−1)(n+1)); the Euler-Maclaurin formula, applied for x=0, shows that
sn=m=0∑ng(m)=∫0n+1g(t)dt−21g(n+1)
+k=1∑p(2k)!b2kg(2k−1)(n+1)+o(g(2p−1)(n+1))
each of the terms of this sum being negligible relative to the preceding one; on expanding each of them relative to a comparison scale E one will then have an asymptotic expansion for sn.
2) Now suppose that for an index q such that 1≤q≤p we have ∣g(2q−1)(n)∣ tending to +∞ with n, but that g(2k−1)(n) tends to 0 for k>q. Since g(2p+1) is monotone on a neighbourhood of +∞ the integral ∫0∞∣g(2p+1)(u)∣du converges, and one can then write
The same formula is valid when g(n) itself tends to 0. Finally, when the series with general term g(n) converges one has, for the remainder rn=∑m=n+1∞g(m), the expansion