Bourbaki

Exercise 11, § 1

Integration, II, p. 17

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let E be a fully lattice-ordered space, (xι)ι∈I(x_\iota)_{\iota \in I} a family of elements of E. For every finite subset H of I, set sH=∑ι∈Hxιs_H = \sum_{\iota \in H} x_\iota; the family (xι)ι∈I(x_\iota)_{\iota \in I} is said to be summable for the order structure of E if the mapping H↦sHH \mapsto s_H has a limit for this order structure, with respect to the directed ordered set F(I)\mathfrak{F}(I) of finite subsets of I; this limit s is then called the sum of the family (xι)ι∈I(x_\iota)_{\iota \in I} and is denoted ∑ι∈Ixι\sum_{\iota \in I} x_\iota.

a) For a family (xι)ι∈I(x_\iota)_{\iota \in I} to be summable, it is necessary and sufficient that: 1° for every finite subset H of I, the set of ∣sK∣|s_K|, where K runs over the set of finite subsets of I that do not intersect H, has a supremum rHr_H in E; 2° inf⁡HrH=0\inf_H r_H = 0 as H runs over F(I)\mathfrak{F}(I) (make use of Exer. 9 a)).

b) Generalize to summable families, for the order structure of E, the properties of summable families in commutative topological groups (GT, III, §5, Props. 2, 3 and Th. 2).

c) Let (xι)ι∈I(x_\iota)_{\iota \in I} be a family of elements ≥0\geq 0 of E; for the family to be summable, it is necessary and sufficient that the set of finite partial sums sHs_H be bounded above (make use of Exer. 9 b)). If (xι)ι∈I(x_\iota)_{\iota \in I} is summable and if (yι)ι∈I(y_\iota)_{\iota \in I} is a family of elements such that 0≤yι≤xι0 \leq y_\iota \leq x_\iota for all ι\iota, show that the family (yι)(y_\iota) is summable and that ∑ι∈Iyι≤∑ι∈Ixι\sum_{\iota \in I} y_\iota \leq \sum_{\iota \in I} x_\iota, with equality holding only if xι=yιx_\iota = y_\iota for all ι∈I\iota \in I.

d) Let (xι)(x_\iota) be a family of elements of E; show that if the family (∣xι∣)(|x_\iota|) is summable for the order structure, then so is the family (xι)(x_\iota).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.