Exercise 9, § 1
Integration, II, p. 16
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
Let E be a fully lattice-ordered space. A filter on E is said to be bounded above (resp. bounded below, bounded) if there is a set in that is bounded above (resp. bounded below, bounded). For a filter that is bounded above (resp. below), the limit superior (resp. limit inferior) of , denoted (resp. ) is defined to be the element (resp. ) of E, where X runs over the set of sets in that are bounded above (resp. bounded below). If is bounded, then ; is said to have a limit, or to be convergent, for the order structure of E, if ; the common value of these two elements is then denoted , and is said to converge to this element of E. If a bounded filter has a limit, then every finer filter has the same limit (for the order structure).
a) In order that a bounded filter have a limit for the order structure, it is necessary and sufficient that as X runs over the set of bounded elements of (one can make use of the fact that if, in E, and are two decreasing families that are bounded below, having the same right-directed index set, then
to prove this formula, one observes that for every pair of indices .
b) Let A be a set filtered by a filter , a mapping of A into E; is said to have a limit with respect to for the order structure of E if is a base of a bounded filter having a limit in E (for the order structure). Show that if A is a directed ordered set and is an increasing mapping of A into E that is bounded above on A, then has a limit with respect to the section filter of A, equal to .
c) Let be a family of fully lattice-ordered spaces, E the product fully lattice-ordered space of the . In order that a bounded filter on E be convergent for the order structure, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every , the filter with base be convergent in ; if is its limit, then is the limit of .
Solution
No solution has been written yet.