Integration, III, p. 61
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
With the notations of No. 6 show that, for there to exist a measure μ=0 on X such that
μ(fJ∘prJ)=K⊃JlimμK(fJ∘prJ,K)=μJ(fJ)⋅λ∈L−J∏μλ(1)
for every finite subset J of L and every function fJ∈C(XJ;C), it is necessary and sufficient that the following three conditions be satisfied:
1∘ μλ=0 for all λ∈L. 2∘ There exists a finite subset J0 of L such that the family (μλ(1))λ∈L−J0 is multipliable in C∗ (hence has a product =0). 3∘ The family (∥μλ∥)λ∈L is multipliable in R+∗ (hence has a product =0).
Under what conditions is the second member of (1) equal to 0 for every finite subset J of L and every function fJ∈C(XJ;C)?