Bourbaki

Exercise 9, § 5

Integration, IX, p. 115

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Notations and hypotheses are those of the preceding exercise. Let (μn)(\mu_n) be a Cauchy sequence in M+b\mathscr{M}_+^b for the metric D; show that the sequence (μn)(\mu_n) is convergent (this gives a new proof of the fact that the space M+b\mathscr{M}_+^b is Polish for the tight topology). One can proceed thus:

a) Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and a>0a > 0 be two real numbers; there exists a finite subset F of T such that sup⁡nμn∙(T−Fa)≤ε\sup_n \mu_n^\bullet(T - F^a) \leq \varepsilon (choose an integer N≥1N \geq 1 and a compact subset K of T such that sup⁡n≥ND(μn,μN)≤ε/2\sup_{n \geq N} D(\mu_n, \mu_N) \leq \varepsilon/2 and μN∙(T−K)≤ε/2\mu_N^\bullet(T - K) \leq \varepsilon/2; deduce from this that sup⁡n≥N∣μn∙(T)−μ∙(T)∣≤ε\sup_{n \geq N} |\mu_n^\bullet(T) - \mu^\bullet(T)| \leq \varepsilon and sup⁡n≥Nμn∙(T−Ka/2)≤ε\sup_{n \geq N} \mu_n^\bullet(T - K^{a/2}) \leq \varepsilon; finally, choose a finite subset F of T such that Ka/2⊂FaK^{a/2} \subset F^a and sup⁡n<Nμn∙(T−Fa)≤ε\sup_{n < N} \mu_n^\bullet(T - F^a) \leq \varepsilon.

b) Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0; there exists a compact subset K of T such that sup⁡μn∙(T−K)≤ε\sup \mu_n^\bullet(T - K) \leq \varepsilon (for every integer p≥1p \geq 1 choose a finite subset FpF_p of T such that μn∙(T−(Fp)2−p)≤ε/2p\mu_n^\bullet(T - (F_p)^{2^{-p}}) \leq \varepsilon/2^p, and set K=⋂p≥1(Fp)2−pK = \bigcap_{p \geq 1} (F_p)^{2^{-p}}).

c) Deduce from b) that the Cauchy sequence (μn)(\mu_n) has a convergent subsequence (for the metric D).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.