Exercise 13, § 5
Integration, V, p. 102
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
Let T be a locally compact space, a positive measure on T, and a sequence of functions in ; set and, for every -measurable set A,
a) Show that if T is not compact, it can happen that the sequence is not bounded in but the sequence of integrals is bounded for every .
b) Show that if the sequence is bounded for every subset A of T reduced to a point and for every open set A such that the measure induced by on the boundary of A has finite support, then the sequence is bounded in , or, what amounts to the same, the sequence of norms is bounded. (Show first that every point of T admits an open neighborhood U such that the sequence of numbers is bounded. For this, one argues by contradiction by proving that, in the contrary case, one could construct a strictly increasing sequence of integers, a decreasing sequence of neighborhoods of , and a sequence of open sets quadrable for (Ch. IV, §5, Exer. 17) having the following properties: , , for , , and finally
Finally, consider the union W of the , to obtain a contradiction (the 'gliding hump method'). Then show by an analogous argument that there exists a compact subset K of T such that the sequence is bounded.)
c) Deduce from b) that if, for every open set A of T, the sequence is bounded, then the sequence is bounded in .
d) On the interval , if one takes for the measure defined by the mass n at the point and the mass at the point , then the sequence is bounded for every open set A that is quadrable for all the measures ; however, the sequence of norms is not bounded. Similarly, if one takes for the measure defined by the mass n at the point and the mass at the point , then the sequence is bounded for every interval A contained in (hence for every finite subset A) without the sequence being bounded.
Solution
No solution has been written yet.