a) If u and v are any two real numbers, prove, for 1<p<+∞, the inequality
∣u+v∣p≤∣u∣p+pvu∣u∣p−2+ar=2∑[p]∣v∣r∣u∣p−r+b∣v∣p,
where a and b are two constants depending only on p, and [p] is the integral part of p (FRV, III, §2, Exer. 6).
b) Let (f~n) be a sequence that converges to 0 in Lp for the weakened topology (1<p<+∞). Show that there exists a subsequence (fnk) of (fn) such that, on setting sm=∑k=1mfnk, one has
∫sm−1∣sm−1∣p−2fnmdμ≤1
(define the sequence (nk) recursively). Deduce from this, using a) and Hölder’s inequality, that if p>2 there exist two constants a,b such that
N1(∣sn∣p)≤N1(∣sn−1∣p)+a+bN1(∣sn−1∣p−2),
and that if 1<p≤2 there exists a constant c such that
N1(∣sn∣p)≤N1(∣sn−1∣p)+c.
Conclude that
Np(sn)=O(n1/2)for p>2Np(sn)=O(n1/p)for 1<p≤2.
c) Show that the preceding results cannot in general be improved upon (cf. Exers. 19 and 20 b)).