Bourbaki

Exercise 2, § 1

Integration, VI

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let T, X, Y be three locally compact spaces, with Y having a countable base. Let μ\mu be a measure ≥0\geq 0 on T, t↦λtt \mapsto \lambda_t (t∈Tt \in T) a μ\mu-adequate1^1 family of measures ≥0\geq 0 on X, and set ν=∫λtdμ(t)\nu = \int \lambda_t d\mu(t). Let x↦ρxx \mapsto \rho_x (x∈Xx \in X) be a ν\nu-adequate family of measures ≥0\geq 0 on Y. Suppose, moreover, that one of the following two conditions is satisfied: a) X is countable at infinity; b) ν\nu is bounded. Under these conditions, show that there exists a locally μ\mu-negligible set N′N' such that, for every t∉N′t \notin N', the family x↦ρxx \mapsto \rho_x is λt\lambda_t-adequate; moreover, the family t↦∫ρxdλt(x)t \mapsto \int \rho_x d\lambda_t(x), defined for t∉N′t \notin N', is μ\mu-adequate, and

∫dμ(t)∫ρxdλt(x)=∫ρxdν(x). \int d\mu(t) \int \rho_x d\lambda_t(x) = \int \rho_x d\nu(x).

(To prove that x↦ρxx \mapsto \rho_x is scalarly λt\lambda_t-integrable locally almost everywhere, make use of Lemma 1 of §3, No. 1, using, in case b), the fact that λt\lambda_t is bounded locally almost

(1) In the sense of the first edition of Ch. V (cf. the footnote to §1, No. 1, Example); similarly for Exercises 3 and 4.

everywhere; same method for seeing that t↦∫ρxdλt(x)t \mapsto \int \rho_x d\lambda_t(x) is scalarly μ\mu-integrable; use also Prop. 13 of No. 5.)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.