Appendix II
Lemma 1. — Let X, B be two locally compact spaces, π a mapping of X into B, ν a positive measure on B. Let b ↦ λb (b ∈ B) be a ν-adequate family of positive measures on X such that, for every b ∈ B, the measure λ_b is concentrated on . Set , and assume that the mapping π is μ-measurable.
a) If N ⊂ B is locally ν-negligible, then is locally μ-negligible. b) If f is a ν-measurable function on B (with values in a topological space), then is μ-measurable on X.
Let K be a compact subset of X. We are to prove that is μ-negligible and that the restriction of to K is μ-measurable. Now, K is the union of a μ-negligible set and a sequence of compact subsets such that is continuous. It suffices to show that is μ-negligible and that the restriction of to is μ-measurable. We may therefore assume henceforth that is continuous. Then is compact. Since and is ν-negligible, we may assume henceforth that N is ν-negligible. Then N is contained in a ν-negligible set that is a countable intersection of open sets (Ch. IV, §4, No. 6, Cor. 2 of Th. 4). Since is μ-measurable, is μ-measurable (Ch. IV, §5, No. 5, Prop. 7), therefore is μ-integrable, and (Ch. V, §3, No. 4, Th. 1)
*Cf. Ch. V, §6, No. 6, Cor. 1 of Prop. 10; the second edition of Ch. V was not available when Ch. VII was published.
Now, if , is -negligible since is concentrated on by hypothesis. Therefore . A fortiori, is -negligible and a) has indeed been proved. On the other hand, there exists a partition of formed by a -negligible set and a sequence of compact sets such that is continuous. Then the restriction of to each set is continuous, and is -negligible by a), therefore the restriction of to is indeed -measurable.
Exercises