Exercise 10, § 3
Integration, VIII, p. 63
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
For a locally compact space T, one denotes by the Banach space of continuous bounded numerical functions on T. A subset H of is said to be cramped if, for every , there exists a compact subset K of T such that for all .
a) Show that if a subset H of is cramped and is bounded for the topology defined by the norm of , then it is relatively compact for the topology (observe that H is relatively compact for ).
b) Assuming in addition that T is paracompact, show that, conversely, if H is a subset of relatively compact for , then H is bounded for the norm of and is cramped. (Consider first the case that , applying Exer. 15 of Ch. V, §5. Then contemplate the case that T is countable at infinity, the union of a sequence of relatively compact open sets such that . Arguing by contradiction, show that one can reduce to the case that there would exist for each n a continuous numerical function defined on T, with support contained in , such that , and a sequence of measures belonging to H and for which for all n. Consider then the continuous mapping such that and obtain a contradiction to what was proved for , by considering the transpose of u. Finally, when T is an arbitrary paracompact locally compact space, T is the topological sum of a family of locally compact spaces that are countable at infinity; for every , let ; show, arguing by contradiction and making use of the preceding case, that necessarily except for a countable infinity of indices .)
c) Show that the conclusion of b) is not valid for the non-paracompact locally compact space defined in Exer. 16 h) of Ch. IV, §4.
Solution
No solution has been written yet.