Bourbaki

Exercise 11, § 3

Integration, VIII, p. 64

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let G be a locally compact group; on M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G), let us denote by TI\mathscr{T}_I the topology σ(M1(G),K(G))\sigma(\mathscr{M}^1(G), \mathscr{K}(G)), by TIII\mathscr{T}_{III} the topology σ(M1(G),C∞(G))\sigma(\mathscr{M}^1(G), C^\infty(G)), and let us write MI,MIII\mathscr{M}_I, \mathscr{M}_{III} for the space M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) equipped respectively with TI\mathscr{T}_I and TIII\mathscr{T}_{III}.

a) Let A be a bounded subset of MI\mathscr{M}_I, and B a relatively compact subset of MIII\mathscr{M}_{III}. Show that the restriction to A×BA \times B of the mapping (μ,ν)↦μ∗ν(\mu, \nu) \mapsto \mu * \nu of MI×MIII\mathscr{M}_I \times \mathscr{M}_{III} into MI\mathscr{M}_I is continuous (use Exer. 10 to reduce to evaluating an integral ∬f(st) dμ(s) dν(t)\iint f(st)\ d\mu(s)\ d\nu(t) when f(st)=∑iui(s)vi(t)f(st) = \sum_i u_i(s)v_i(t) with uiu_i and viv_i in K(G)\mathscr{K}(G)).

b) Give an example where G is compact (hence TI=TIII\mathscr{T}_I = \mathscr{T}_{III}) showing that (μ,ν)↦μ∗ν(\mu, \nu) \mapsto \mu * \nu, regarded as a mapping of MI×MIII\mathscr{M}_I \times \mathscr{M}_{III} into MI\mathscr{M}_I, is not hypocontinuous with respect to the relatively compact subsets of MI\mathscr{M}_I, nor with respect to the relatively compact subsets of MIII\mathscr{M}_{III} (cf. Exer. 6).

c) Let A, B be two relatively compact subsets of MIII\mathscr{M}_{III}. Show that the restriction to A×BA \times B of the mapping (μ,ν)↦μ∗ν(\mu, \nu) \mapsto \mu * \nu of MIII×MIII\mathscr{M}_{III} \times \mathscr{M}_{III} into MIII\mathscr{M}_{III} is continuous (same method as in a)).

d) Denote by E the subspace of RG\mathbf{R}^G formed by the linear combinations of characteristic functions of open subsets of G, by TIV\mathscr{T}_{IV} the topology σ(M1(G),E)\sigma(\mathscr{M}^1(G), E), and by MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV} the space M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) equipped with TIV\mathscr{T}_{IV}. Recall that the topologies induced by TIII\mathscr{T}_{III} and TIV\mathscr{T}_{IV} on a bounded subset of M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) consisting of positive measures, are in general distinct (Ch. V, §5, Exer. 16 c)). Recall also that the compact subsets of MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV} are the same as those of M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) for the weakened topology σ(M1(G),(M1(G))′)\sigma(\mathscr{M}^1(G), (\mathscr{M}^1(G))') on the Banach space M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) (Ch. VI, §2, Exer. 12). Show that if A, B are two relatively compact subsets of MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV}, the restriction to A×BA \times B of the mapping (μ,ν)↦μ∗ν(\mu, \nu) \mapsto \mu * \nu of MIV×MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV} \times \mathscr{M}_{IV} into MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV} is continuous. (Restrict attention to the case that A and B are compact, and begin by proving that the image of A×BA \times B under the preceding mapping is then compact for σ(M1(G),(M1(G))′)\sigma(\mathscr{M}^1(G), (\mathscr{M}^1(G))'); for this, apply the theorems of Eberlein and Šmulian (TVS, IV, §5, No. 3), and thus reduce to proving that if (μn),(νn)(\mu_n), (\nu_n) are two sequences that converge to 0 in MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV}, then the same is true of the sequence (μn∗νn)(\mu_n * \nu_n); make use of Prop. 12 and Exer. 15 of Ch. V, §5. Finally, to prove that (μ,ν)↦μ∗ν(\mu, \nu) \mapsto \mu * \nu is continuous for TIV\mathscr{T}_{IV}, use c) and the fact that TIII\mathscr{T}_{III} is coarser than TIV\mathscr{T}_{IV}.)

e) Take G=R2G = \mathbf{R}^2; let a,ba, b be the vectors of the canonical basis of G over R\mathbf{R}, ρn\rho_n the measure on the interval I=[0,π]I = [0, \pi] of R\mathbf{R} having as density with respect to Lebesgue measure the function sin⁡(2nx)\sin(2^n x), and μn\mu_n the measure ρn⊗ε0\rho_n \otimes \varepsilon_0 on R×R\mathbf{R} \times \mathbf{R}; on the other hand let νn=εb/2n−ε0\nu_n = \varepsilon_{b/2^n} - \varepsilon_0 on G. Show that the sequence (μn)(\mu_n) tends to 0 in MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV} and that the sequence (νn)(\nu_n) tends to 0 in MIII\mathscr{M}_{III}, but that the sequence (μn∗νn)(\mu_n * \nu_n) does not tend to 0 in MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV} (cf. Ch. V, §5, Exer. 16).

f) Give an example where G is compact and where (μ,ν)↦μ∗ν(\mu, \nu) \mapsto \mu * \nu, regarded as a mapping of MIV×MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV} \times \mathscr{M}_{IV} into MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV}, is not hypocontinuous relative to the compact subsets of MIV\mathscr{M}_{IV} (same method as in Exer. 6, on observing that for a given f∈Ef \in E there exist compact subsets H⊂MIVH \subset \mathscr{M}_{IV} such that the set of functions t↦∫f(st) dμ(s)t \mapsto \int f(st)\ d\mu(s), where μ\mu runs over H, has finite rank over R\mathbf{R}).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.