Bourbaki

Exercise 16, § 1

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, I, 76

Let g\mathfrak{g} be a Lie algebra and D\mathfrak{D} the Lie algebra of derivations of g\mathfrak{g}. The identity mapping of D\mathfrak{D} defines a semi-direct product h\mathfrak{h} of D\mathfrak{D} by g\mathfrak{g} called the holomorph of g\mathfrak{g}. g\mathfrak{g} is identified with an ideal and D\mathfrak{D} with a subalgebra of h\mathfrak{h}.

(a) Show that the centralizer g∗\mathfrak{g}^* of g\mathfrak{g} in h\mathfrak{h} is the set of ad⁡gx−x(x∈g)\operatorname{ad}_g x - x(x \in \mathfrak{g}).

(b) For every element x+dx + d of h\mathfrak{h} (x∈gx \in \mathfrak{g}, d∈Dd \in \mathfrak{D}), we write

θ(x+d)=ad⁡gx−x+d. \theta(x + d) = \operatorname{ad}_g x - x + d.
Show that θ\theta is an automorphism of h\mathfrak{h} of order 2 which maps g\mathfrak{g} onto g∗\mathfrak{g}^*, so that h\mathfrak{h} can be considered as the holomorph of g∗\mathfrak{g}^*.

(c) For every ideal k≠{0}\mathfrak{k} \neq \{0\} of h\mathfrak{h}, k∩(g+g∗)≠{0}\mathfrak{k} \cap (\mathfrak{g} + \mathfrak{g}^*) \neq \{0\}. (If k∩g={0}\mathfrak{k} \cap \mathfrak{g} = \{0\}, k⊂g∗\mathfrak{k} \subset \mathfrak{g}^*.)

(d) If g\mathfrak{g} is commutative, every ideal k≠{0}\mathfrak{k} \neq \{0\} of h\mathfrak{h} contains g\mathfrak{g}. If KK is a field and dim⁡Kg<+∞\dim_K \mathfrak{g} < +\infty, deduce that, if k≠g\mathfrak{k} \neq \mathfrak{g}, h\mathfrak{h} cannot be the holomorph of k\mathfrak{k} (use (b)).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.