Bourbaki

Exercise 4, § 6

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, II, 202

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let XX be a finite set and let L^=L^(X)\hat{L} = \hat{L}(X). We give L^\hat{L} the Hausdorff law of composition (a,b)↦aHb(a, b) \mapsto a \mathbf{H} b, which we denote simply by a.ba.b. If t∈Kt \in K, a∈L^a \in \hat{L}, we write at=taa^t = ta. (a) Let H\mathscr{H} be a Hall set relative to XX. If m∈Hm \in \mathscr{H}, let mLm_L denote the corresponding element of the Lie algebra L(X)L(X) (§ 2, no. 11) and mHm_{\mathscr{H}} the basic commutator of the group L^\hat{L} defined by mm (§ 5, no. 4, Remark). If mm is of length ll, show that mH=mL+μm_{\mathscr{H}} = m_L + \mu, where μ\mu is of filtration ⩾l+1\geqslant l + 1 (argue by induction on ll). Deduce that every element ww of the group L^\hat{L} can be written uniquely in the form

w=∏m∈HmHα(m), w = \prod_{m \in \mathscr{H}} m_{\mathscr{H}}^{\alpha(m)},

where α(m)∈K\alpha(m) \in K and the product is convergent in the topological group L^\hat{L}.

(b) Let PP be the set of prime numbers and let cc be an integer ⩾1\geqslant 1. Let K=QK = \mathbf{Q}. Show that the group L^/L^c\hat{L}/\hat{L}_c is identified with the PP-envelope FPcF_P^c of the group Fc=F(X)/CcF(X)F^c = F(X)/C^cF(X), cf. § 5, Exercise 6.

(c) Take XX to be a set of two elements {U,V}\{U, V\}. Show the existence of two families α(m),β(m)\alpha(m), \beta(m) of rational numbers such that

U+V=∏m∈HmHα(m) U + V = \prod_{m \in \mathscr{H}} m_{\mathscr{H}}^{\alpha(m)}
[U,V]=∏m∈HmHβ(m). [U, V] = \prod_{m \in \mathscr{H}} m_{\mathscr{H}}^{\beta(m)}.
For example
U+V=U.V. (U,V)−12… U + V = U.V.\ (U, V)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \ldots
[U,V]=(U,V)… [U, V] = (U, V) \ldots

(d) Let gg be a nilpotent Lie Q\mathbf{Q}-algebra with the Hausdorff group law. Let u,vu, v be in gg. Show that

u+v=∏m∈HmH(u,v)α(m) u + v = \prod_{m \in \mathscr{H}} m_{\mathscr{H}}(u, v)^{\alpha(m)}
[u,v]=∏m∈HmH(u,v)β(m), [u, v] = \prod_{m \in \mathscr{H}} m_{\mathscr{H}}(u, v)^{\beta(m)},
where α\alpha and β\beta are the families of rational numbers defined above ("inversion of the Hausdorff formula"). (Use the continuous homomorphism ϕ:L^→g\phi : \hat{L} \to g such that ϕ(U)=u,ϕ(V)=v\phi(U) = u, \phi(V) = v and note that it is also a homomorphism for the Hausdorff group law.)

(e) Let GG be a torsion-free divisible nilpotent group (i.e. PP-torsion-free and PP-divisible). If u∈G,t∈Q,utu \in G, t \in \mathbf{Q}, u^t is defined (§ 4, Exercise 16). If u∈G,v∈Gu \in G, v \in G, we define u+vu + v and [u,v][u, v] by the formulae of (d) above. Show that GG thus has a nilpotent Lie Q\mathbf{Q}-algebra structure and that the corresponding Hausdorff law is the given group law on GG (verify these assertions when GG is a group FPcF_P^c, cf. (b), and pass from this to the general case using homomorphisms of FPcF_P^c into GG).

Let ff be a mapping of GG into a torsion-free divisible nilpotent group G′G'. Show that ff is a (group) homomorphism if and only if it is a Lie algebra homomorphism. (The Hausdorff law therefore defines an isomorphism of the "category" of nilpotent Lie Q\mathbf{Q}-algebras onto that of torsion-free divisible nilpotent groups.)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.