§ 8. Lie groups over R and Qp
1. Continuous morphisms
Theorem 1
Let G and H be two Lie group germs over R or Qp. Let f be a continuous morphism of G into H. Then f is analytic.
We give L(G) and L(H) norms which define their topologies and such that ∥[x,y]∥≤∥x∥∥y∥ for all x,y. There exist an open ball V of centre 0 in L(G) and an exponential mapping ϕ of G defined on V such that: (1) ϕ(V) is an open neighbourhood of e in G; (2) ϕ is an isomorphism of the analytic manifold V onto the analytic manifold ϕ(V); (3) ϕ(nx)=ϕ(x)n for all x∈V and all n∈Z such that nx∈V. We define similarly W and ψ for H. By shrinking V if necessary, it can be assumed that f(ϕ(V))⊂ψ(W). Then g=ψ−1∘f∘ϕ is a continuous mapping of V into W.
We show that
(x∈V,λ∈Q and λx∈V)⇒g(λx)=λg(x). It can be assumed that
λ=0. Let
λ=qr with
r,q in
Z−{0}. Let
y=qrx.
If K=R, we write z=qx=ry∈V. Then x=qz,y=rz, whence
g(x)=ψ−1(f(ϕ(qz)))=ψ−1(f(ϕ(z)q))=ψ−1(f(ϕ(z))q). We show that
ψ−1(f(ϕ(z))q)=qψ−1(f(ϕ(z)))=qg(z). It suffices to verify that, if
u∈ψ(W) is such that
uq∈ψ(W), then
ψ−1(uq)=qψ−1(u); but if
u=ψ(v),
uq=ψ(vq), then
v1/q∈W and
(ψ(v1/q))q=uq, hence
ψ(v1/q)=u=ψ(v) and therefore
v1=qv.
Similarly, g(y)=rg(z), whence (1).
If K=Qp, we write z=rx=qy∈V, whence g(z)=rg(x)=qg(y), whence again (1).
As Q is dense in K, (1) implies that
(x∈V,λ∈K and λx∈V)⇒g(λx)=λg(x). Let
x∈L(G) and
λ,λ′ be elements of
K∗ such that
λx∈V,λ′x∈V. Then
g(λ′x)=g(λλ′λx)=λλ′g(λx) by (2) and hence
λ1g(λx)=λ′1g(λ′x). Thus an extension
h of
g to
L(G) is defined by writing
h(x)=λ1g(λx) for all
λ such that
λx∈V. Clearly
h is continuous. We show that
(x∈L(G) and λ∈K)⇒h(λx)=λh(x). Let
λ′∈K∗ be such that
λ′x∈V and
λ′λx∈V. Then
h(λx)=λ′1g(λ′λx)=λ′1λg(λ′x)=λλ′1g(λ′x)=λh(x). Let
x,y be in
L(G). Then, by Proposition 4 of § 4, no. 3,
h(x)+h(y)=λ∈K∗,λ→0limλ−1ψ−1(ψ(λh(x))ψ(λh(y)))=λ∈K∗,λ→0limλ−1ψ−1(ψ(h(λx))ψ(h(λy))). For
∣λ∣ sufficiently small,
λx∈V and
λy∈V and hence the above expression is equal to
λ∈K∗,λ→0limλ−1ψ−1(f(ϕ(λx))f(ϕ(λy)))=λ∈K∗,λ→0limλ−1(ψ−1∘f)(ϕ(λx)ϕ(λy))=λ∈K∗,λ→0limλ−1g(ϕ−1(ϕ(λx)ϕ(λy)))=λ∈K∗,λ→0limh(λ−1ϕ−1(ϕ(λx)ϕ(λy)))=h(λ∈K∗,λ→0limλ−1ϕ−1(ϕ(λx)ϕ(λy)))=h(x+y). Thus
h is continuous and linear, hence
g=h∣V is analytic, hence
f is analytic on
ϕ(V) and hence
f is analytic (§ 1, no. 10).
Corollary 1
Let G be a topological group. There exists on G at most one analytic manifold structure over R (resp. Qp) compatible with the topological group structure on G.
This follows immediately from Theorem 1.
Definition 1
A topological group G is called a real (resp. p-adic) Lie group if there exists on G a real (resp. p-adic) Lie group structure compatible with its topology.
That structure is then unique and we can speak of the dimension of such a group. If G and H are two such groups, every continuous morphism of G into H is analytic.
Corollary 2
Let G be a topological group and V an open neighbourhood of e. Suppose that V has an analytic manifold structure which makes it into a real (resp. p-adic) Lie group germ. Then G is a real (resp. p-adic) Lie group.
Let g∈G. There exists an open neighbourhood V′ of e in G such that V′∪gV′g−1⊂V. The mapping v↦gvg−1 of V′ into V is a continuous and hence analytic morphism of the Lie group germ V′ into the Lie group germ V. It then suffices to apply Proposition 18 of § 1, no. 9.
Proposition 1
Let G, G' be topological groups and f a continuous morphism of G into G'. Suppose that one of the following three cases holds: (a) G is a real Lie group and G' is a p-adic Lie group; (b) G is a p-adic Lie group and G' is a real Lie group; (c) G is a p-adic Lie group and G' is a p′-adic Lie group with p=p′. Then f is locally constant.
Case (a). Let G0 be the identity component of G. Then f(G0) is a connected subgroup of G′ and hence f(G0)={e} and G0 is open in G.
Case (b). Let V′ be a neighbourhood of e in G′ such that every subgroup of G′ contained in V′ reduces to {e} (§ 4, no. 2, Corollary 1 to Theorem 2). There exists a neighbourhood V of e in G such that f(V)⊂V′. Then there exists an open subgroup G1 of G such that G1⊂V (§ 7, no. 1, Proposition 1). Then f(G1)={e}.
Case (c). By § 7, Theorem 4 and the Corollary to Proposition 8, there exists a neighbourhood V′ of e in G′ such that, for all x′∈V′−{e}, x′pn does not tend
† See for example D. Montgomery and L. Zippin, Topological transformation groups, Interscience tracts in pure and applied mathematics, no. 1, Interscience publishers, New York 1955 (in particular pp. 169 and 184).
to e as n tends to +∞. There exists a neighbourhood V of e in G such that f(V)⊂V′. By § 7, Theorem 4 and Proposition 9, there exists an open subgroup G1 of G such that G1⊂V and such that, for all x∈G1, xpn tends to e as n tends to +∞. Then f(G1)={e}.
2. Closed subgroups
Theorem 2
Let G be a finite-dimensional Lie group over R or Qp. Every closed subgroup of G is a Lie subgroup of G. More generally, let U be a symmetric open neighbourhood of e in G and H a non-empty closed subspace of U such that the conditions x∈H, y∈H and xy−1∈U imply xy−1∈H. Then H is a Lie subgroup germ of G.
Let h be the Lie subalgebra tangent to H at e (§ 4, no. 5, Definition 2). There exists a Lie subgroup germ H0 of G with Lie algebra h and contained in H. We prove that H0 is open in H with the topology induced by that on G. This will prove that H is an analytic submanifold of G and will establish the theorem.
There exist a vector subspace k supplementary to h in L(G), symmetric open neighbourhoods V1,V2 of zero in h and k respectively and an exponential mapping ϕ of G defined on V1+V2 and possessing the following properties:
(a) the mapping (a1,a2)↦ϕ(a1)ϕ(a2) is an analytic isomorphism of V1×V2 onto an open subset V of G; (b) ϕ(V1)⊂H0; (c) V2⊂U.
We shall prove (and this will achieve the proof) that there exists an open neighbourhood V2′ of 0 in V2 such that H∩(ϕ(V1)ϕ(V2′))=ϕ(V1).
Suppose that the assertion is false. Then we can find a sequence (xn) in V1 and a sequence (yn) in V2−{0} tending to 0, such that ϕ(xn)ϕ(yn)∈H for all n. Then ϕ(yn)∈H by (c).
If K=Qp, it can be assumed that V2 is an additive subgroup of k and that ϕ(pa)=ϕ(a)p for all a∈V2 and all p∈Z. Then ϕ(λy1)∈H for all λ∈Z and hence by continuity for all λ∈Zp. The mapping f:λ↦ϕ(λy1) of Zp into G is analytic and takes its values in H and (T0f)(1)=y1. Hence y1∈h, which is absurd. The theorem is therefore established in the case of Qp.
If K=R, it can be assumed that V2 is connected and that yn belongs to 21V2−{0}. By taking a subsequence of (yn) if necessary, we can find a sequence (λn) of non-zero scalars such that λn−1yn tends to an element y of V2−{0}. The sequence (λn) tends to 0. Let λ∈R be such that λy∈21V2; we prove that exp(λy)∈H. It can be assumed that λλn−1yn∈21V2 for all n. Let kn∈Z be such that ∣λ−knλn∣ tends to 0. For n sufficiently large, (λ−knλn)λn−1yn∈21V2 and hence knyn∈21V2. Hence exp(hyn)∈H for h an integer and 0≤∣h∣≤∣kn∣ (as is seen by induction on ∣h∣). Then
exp(λy)=n→∞limexp(λλn−1yn)=n→∞lim(exp((λ−knλn)λn−1yn)exp(knyn))=n→∞limexpknyn∈H.
Hence the mapping f:λ↦expλy, where λy∈41V2, takes its values in H and (T0f)(1)=y. Hence y∈h, which is absurd. The theorem is thus established in the case of R.
Theorem 2 is no longer true if G is not assumed to be finite-dimensional (Exercise 12).
Corollary 1
Let G′ be a locally compact group, G a finite-dimensional Lie group over R (resp. Qp) and f a continuous morphism of G′ into G. If the kernel of f is discrete, G′ is a finite-dimensional real (resp. p-adic) Lie group.
There exists a compact neighbourhood V of e in G′ such that f∣V is a homeomorphism of V onto a compact subspace of G. If U is a sufficiently small open neighbourhood of e in G, the hypotheses of Theorem 2 are satisfied with H=f(V)∩U. Hence H is a Lie subgroup germ of G. Let W be the inverse image of H under f∣V. Then W is a neighbourhood of e in G′. Let W be given the analytic manifold structure transported from that on H by (f∣W)−1. For all z∈G′, the mapping x↦f(z)xf(z)−1 of G into G is analytic; hence there exists an open neighbourhood W′ of e in W such that the mapping x′↦zx′z−1 of W′ into W is analytic. By Proposition 18 of § 1, no. 9, there exists on G′ a Lie group structure which induces on a sufficiently small open neighbourhood of e the same analytic structure as W and hence the same topology as the initial topology on G′.
Corollary 2
Let G be a finite-dimensional Lie group over K, H a subgroup of G, V an open neighbourhood of e in G and (Mi)i∈I a family of analytic manifolds over K; for all i∈I, let fi be a K-analytic mapping of V into Mi such that
H∩V={x∈V∣fi(x)=fi(e) for all i∈I}.
(i) If K=C, H is a Lie subgroup of G. (ii) If K is a finite extension of Qp and I is finite, H is a Lie subgroup of G.
(i) Suppose that K=C. We consider G as a real Lie group. Then H is a real Lie subgroup of G (Theorem 2). Let a∈L(H). There exists a connected open neighbourhood W of 0 in C such that expλa∈V for all λ∈W. Let i∈I. Then fi(expλa)=fi(e) if λ∈R∩W. Hence fi(expλa)=fi(e) if λ∈W by analytic continuation. Thus, expλa∈H for λ∈W and therefore μa∈L(H) for all μ∈C. Therefore H is a Lie subgroup of the complex Lie group G (§ 4, no. 2, Proposition 2).
(ii) Suppose that K is a finite extension of Qp. We consider G as a Lie group over Qp. It is finite-dimensional and Theorem 2 implies that H is a p-adic Lie subgroup of G. Since I is finite, ∏i∈IMi is a manifold and it can be assumed that the family (fi) reduces to a single mapping f. Let a∈L(G). Let ϕ be an exponential mapping of G. Then f(ϕ(λa))=f(e) for λ∈Qp and ∣λ∣ sufficiently small. Since f is K-analytic, it follows that f(ϕ(λa))=f(e) for λ∈K and ∣λ∣ sufficiently small. Hence ϕ(λa)∈H for λ∈K and ∣λ∣ sufficiently small and therefore μa∈L(H) for all μ∈K. The proof is completed as in (i).
Corollary 2 (ii) is no longer true if we omit the hypothesis that I is finite.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 8.