Bourbaki

Exercise 22, § 6

General Topology, III, 321

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

In a division ring KK endowed with a Hausdorff topology T\mathfrak{T} compatible with the ring structure of KK, a set RR containing oo is said to be retrobounded if (CR)−1(\mathbf{C}R)^{-1} is bounded. T\mathfrak{T} is said to be locally retrobounded if there is a fundamental system of retrobounded neighbourhoods of oo in KK with respect to T\mathfrak{T}.

a) A locally retrobounded topology TT is locally bounded, and is a minimal element in the set of all Hausdorff topologies compatible with the ring structure of KK; also T\mathfrak{T} is compatible with the division ring structure of KK [use Exercise 19 a)].

b) Suppose from now on, in this exercise, that T\mathfrak{T} is a locally retrobounded topology on KK. Show that, for every neighbourhood VV of oo in KK, x→x−1x \to x^{-1} is uniformly continuous on CV\mathbf{C}V. Hence show that the completion K^\hat{K} of KK is a topological division ring whose topology is locally retrobounded.

c) Every neighbourhood of oo in KK (with respect to T\mathfrak{T}) contains a neighbourhood VV of oo such that E(V)=(CV)∩(CV)−1E(V) = (\mathbf{C}V) \cap (\mathbf{C}V)^{-1} is not empty. Show that the three uniformities on E(V)E(V), induced by the additive uniformity and the two multiplicative uniformities on KK, coincide. Deduce that, if KK is complete, then K∗K^* is complete with respect to either multiplicative uniformity.

d) Show that if xx is an element of K∗K^* then exactly one of the following three statements is true: (i) xx is topologically nilpotent; (ii) x−1x^{-1} is topologically nilpotent; (iii) the sequence (xn)n∈Z(x^n)_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} is bounded. [By considering a bounded neighbourhood UU of oo such that UU⊂UUU \subset U

(Exercise 20 d)), show that if o is a cluster point of the sequence (xn)n≥0(x^n)_{n \geq 0}, then xx is topologically nilpotent.] If KK contains non-zero topologically nilpotent elements, show that the set BB, consisting of o and all x∈K∗x \in K^* such that x−1x^{-1} is not topologically nilpotent, is a bounded neighbourhood of o in KK which is invariant under all inner automorphisms [use Exercise 21 b)]; BB then contains all bounded neighbourhoods UU of o such that UU⊂UUU \subset U; the set of such neighbourhoods which are invariant under all inner automorphisms has a greatest element, which coincides with BB if the commutator subgroup of K∗K^* is bounded, in particular if KK is a field.

e) If UU is a bounded symmetric neighbourhood of o in KK such that UU⊂UUU \subset U, then there exists b∈U∗b \in U^* such that K∗=U∗∪((U∗)−1b)K^* = U^* \cup ((U^*)^{-1} b). Let a∈U∗a \in U^* be such that Ua⊂bUUa \subset bU, and suppose that the sequence (a−n)n≥0(a^{-n})_{n \geq 0} is bounded. Show that the set VV of all x∈Kx \in K such that xUxU is contained in the union of the sets Ua−nUa^{-n} is a bounded neighbourhood of o such that VV⊂VVV \subset V and K∗=V∗∪(V∗)−1K^* = V^* \cup (V^*)^{-1}.

f) Suppose that KK contains no non-zero topologically nilpotent elements. Show that there is a bounded neighbourhood of o in KK which is a subring AA of KK such that K∗=A∗∪(A∗)−1K^* = A^* \cup (A^*)^{-1}. [Begin with a bounded neighbourhood VV of o such that K∗=V∗∪(V∗)−1K^* = V^* \cup (V^*)^{-1} (see e)]; if c∈V∗c \in V^* is such that c(V+V)⊂Vc(V + V) \subset V, observe that the ring AA generated by VV is contained in the union of the sets Vc−n ( n≥0Vc^{-n}\ (\ n \geq 0.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.