1. Subgroups and quotient groups of
Let us first introduce the following convention: if G is a topological group, we have defined (Chapter III, § 2) the product group of n factors equal to G, for each integer . In this section, we shall extend this definition to the case by the convention that denotes a group consisting of only one element. If H is any group, we shall identify with H.
On the set , we shall have to consider on the one hand its (additive) topological group structure and on the other hand its vector space structure over the field (Chapter VI, § 1, no. 3). Given a subset A of , we may envisage the subgroup of generated by A (the set of all linear combinations of points of A, with integer coefficients) and also the vector subspace generated by A (the set of all linear combinations of points of A, with real coefficients); these two notions must be carefully distinguished. In accordance with the definitions made in algebra, the rank of A is the dimension of the vector subspace V of generated by A; to say that A is of rank is therefore equivalent to saying that there are points which form a free system with respect to the field (in other words, the relation , where the are real, implies for each ) and form a basis of V (which means that every point of V is a linear combination of the with real coefficients).
In what follows we shall also have to make use of the notion of a system of points of which are free with respect to the field of rational numbers; such a system is a finite subset of such that the relation , where the are rational numbers (or integers — it comes to the same thing), implies that for each . This notion must be carefully distinguished from that of a free system with respect to : every system which is free with respect to is free with respect to , but the converse is false (for example, the numbers 1 and in form a free system with respect to , but not a free system with respect to ). Whenever we speak of a free system without qualification, we shall always mean a free system with respect to . It is therefore necessary to distinguish on the vector space structure with respect to from the vector space structure with respect to ; in particular, the vector subspace with respect to generated by a subset of is the set of all linear combinations of with rational coefficients; it is contained in the vector subspace (with respect to ) generated by , but is in general distinct from . The dimension of (with respect to ) is called the rational rank of ; it is at least equal to the rank of defined above (the dimension of with respect to ); it may be infinite if is an infinite set, while the rank of any non-empty subset of is always ; in particular, the rational rank of any uncountable subset of is always infinite, because any finite-dimensional vector space over is countable.
In this section we shall first determine the structure of the closed subgroups of the additive group .
1. Discrete subgroups of
We have seen in Chapter V (§ 1, no. 1, Proposition 1) that the only closed subgroups of , other than itself, are the discrete subgroups, generated by a single element. We shall begin by considering the discrete subgroups of .
First of all, the subgroup of generated by vectors () of the canonical basis (Chapter VI, § 1, no. 3) of is a discrete group isomorphic to the product of groups which are equal to . More generally, consider the subgroup generated by points () which form a free system. There is a bijective linear mapping of onto itself which maps to (); since such a mapping is an automorphism of the topological group , is isomorphic as a topological group to the subgroup generated by the () and is therefore a discrete subgroup of rank isomorphic to .
The structure of the group , and hence that of , has been studied in algebra. We recall the main results of this study. The bases of with respect to the ring are systems of points
where the are integers such that the determinant is equal to or . Every subgroup of is discrete and of rank ; furthermore, if is a given subgroup of rank , there exists a free system of points () which generates , and a system of points () which generates , such that we have for , where the are integers (the invariant factors of with respect to ) such that
We shall show now that the discrete subgroups of which we have just been considering are the only ones that exist.
Proposition 1
Let be a discrete subgroup of of rank , let be a free system of points of , and let be the closed parallelo-tope with centre and basis vectors (Chapter VI, § 1, no. 3). Then the set is finite and generates , and every point of is a linear combination of the with rational coefficients.
is compact and discrete, hence finite. Let be any point of ; it is equal to a linear combination of the with real coefficients. For each integer , consider the point
Corollary
Let be a free system of points of and let*
(*) We recall (Chapter IV, § 8, no. 2) that, for each real number is the integral part of , i.e., the largest rational integer .
Proposition 1 shows that the condition is necessary. Also it is sufficient, for if it is satisfied we can write , where and the are integers (); is therefore a linear combination, with integer coefficients, of the points ; hence is a subgroup of the discrete group generated by these points, and so is itself discrete.
The result of Proposition 1 can be expressed as follows: if points () of a discrete subgroup of form a system which is dependent with respect to , then they form a system which is dependent with respect to . It follows immediately that the rational rank of a discrete subgroup of is equal to its rank.
The Corollary to Proposition 1, applied to the case where the are the vectors of the canonical basis of , gives us the following proposition:
Proposition 2 (Kronecker). Let be real numbers. In order that, for each , there exist an integer and integers
Theorem 1
Every discrete subgroup of , of rank equal to , is generated by a free system of points.
By virtue of the properties of groups isomorphic to recalled earlier, it is enough to show that is a subgroup of a discrete group generated by a free system of points. Now since is of rank there exists a free system of points () of such that every is equal to a linear combination of the with real coefficients; since is discrete, Proposition 1 shows that the are rational. Furthermore, Proposition 1 shows that is generated by a finite number of points; since these points are linear combinations of the with rational coefficients, there exists an integer such that they are linear combinations with integer coefficients of the points . It follows that is a subgroup of the group generated by the .
Theorem 1 can also be proved without recourse to the theory of invariant factors (cf. Exercise 1).
Discrete subgroups of which are of rank are also called lattices in .
2. Closed subgroups of
We know already of two types of closed subgroups of ; on the one hand, the vector subspaces of , which are isomorphic to the groups () (Chapter IV, § 1, no. 4, Proposition 2); on the other hand, the discrete subgroups (Chapter III, § 2, no. 1, Proposition 5) which are isomorphic to groups (), as we have just seen. We shall now determine the structure of an arbitrary closed subgroup of by showing that such a subgroup is isomorphic to a product of the form
The proof rests on the following proposition:
Proposition 3
Every non-discrete closed subgroup of* contains a line passing through .
Let be an infinite sequence of points of such that and ; by hypothesis such a sequence exists. Let be an open cube with centre , containing the . Let denote the largest integer such that (since is a bounded box and , the existence of follows from Archimedes' axiom). The points lie in a compact set , hence the sequence has a cluster point . If , we have
and since , it follows that is also a cluster point of the sequence , whose points belong to the closed set , by definition of ; hence (the frontier of , Fig. 5), which implies . Moreover, since is closed, we have . Let be any real number; since , the relation implies that ; since , is a
!Figure 5 Figure 5.
!Figure 6 Figure 6.
cluster point of the sequence ([tk_p]x_p); but the points of this sequence belong to G, and consequently ta ∈ G, since G is closed. This completes the proof.
Theorem 2
Let G be a closed subgroup of , of rank r (). Then there is a largest vector subspace V contained in G; for every vector subspace W complementary to V, is discrete and G is the direct sum of V and .
Let us first establish the existence of V by showing that the union of all the lines through o which lie in G is a vector subspace: indeed, the vector subspace generated by the union of these lines is the same as the subgroup they generate. The group G is the direct sum of V and ; for if , we have where and ; since , and therefore . It remains to show that is discrete; this follows from Proposition 3, since is a closed subgroup which contains no lines, by reason of the definition of V.
If , we may say that G is the union of a countable infinity of linear varieties, parallel to V and passing through the points of the discrete group (Fig. 6).
If is the dimension of the vector subspace V, we have , and is a discrete group of rank .
Corollary 1
There exists a basis of , such that
This follows from Theorem 2, and Theorem 1 of no. 1 applied to the discrete group .
Corollary 2
There exists an automorphism of which maps G onto the group , isomorphic to , which is the direct sum of the vector subspace generated by and the (discrete) additive subgroup generated by .
This is an immediate consequence of Corollary 1. Corollary 2 of Theorem 2 shows that a closed subgroup G of is completely determined up to isomorphism by two integers : its rank, which we denote by , and the dimension of the largest vector subspace contained in G, which we call the dimension of G and denote by .
The only conditions which these integers have to satisfy are the inequalities .
3. Associated subgroups
Let be an arbitrary subgroup (closed or not) of . Consider the set of points such that, for all , the number is an integer. It is immediately seen that is a subgroup of ; it is called the subgroup associated with (*). If and are two subgroups of such that , it is clear that .
Proposition 4
The subgroup associated with a subgroup of is closed, and we have .
For each , let denote ; is a linear form, therefore continuous. Since is the intersection of the sets as runs through , and since each of these sets is closed, it follows that is closed. On the other hand, if , we have for all , and therefore, as is closed in , for all ; thus . But we have (since ), so that .
Consider the structure of when is closed. By Corollary 1 to Theorem 2 of no. 2, there exists a base of such that coincides with the set of points
where the take all real values and the take all integer values. Hence is an integer for all these points if and only if for and is an integer for . Let us denote by the basis of such that for and
(*) This notion is a particular case, corresponding to the group , of a general notion in the theory of duality of locally compact abelian groups (see, e.g., A. Weil, "L'integration dans les groupes topologiques et ses applications", Act. Sci. et Ind. no. 869, Paris, Hermann, 1950, pp. 108-109). The reader will observe the close analogy which exists between the properties of associated subgroups in and those of orthogonal vector subspaces of a vector space and its dual.
[the basis "dual" to ]; if we put , it is clear that the points are characterized by the following conditions: for , and for
Proposition 5
For every closed subgroup* of ,
Proposition 6
For every subgroup* of , we have .
Corollary
A point* lies in the closure of a subgroup of if and only if is an integer for all such that is an integer for all .
Let us apply this characterization of points lying in the closure of a subgroup to the case of the subgroup generated by the vectors of the canonical basis and by an arbitrary number of points of . To say that is an integer for means that the coordinates of are integers; therefore:
Proposition 7 (Kronecker)
Let* be points of and let be a point of . In order that, for each , there exist integers and integers such that
Corollary 1
In order that, for each* and each , there exist integers and integers () *such that
it is necessary and sufficient that there exist no finite sequence of integers, not all zero, such that each of the numbers is an integer.
For if is dense in , that is if , then , and conversely.
In particular :
Corollary 2
Let be real numbers. In order that, given any real numbers and a real number , there should exist an integer and integers such that
it is necessary and sufficient that there exist no relation of the form , where the are integers not all zero, and is an integer [which implies, in particular, that the and the ratios () must be irrational].
We may interpret this result as follows: for each integer , let denote the point with coordinates (); then Corollary 2 gives a necessary and sufficient condition for the set of points to be dense in the cube which is the product of intervals in the factors of .
Proposition 8
If are any closed subgroups of , we have
The real number is an integer for all and all if and only if is an integer for all and is an integer for all , because ; hence
for any two subgroups of . If now we suppose that and are closed, we have by Proposition 6; hence, taking the associated subgroups and applying Proposition 6 again,
Remark
Let be two lattices in (no. 1) such that : then (Proposition 5) and are lattices in such that . We have seen in no. 1 that there is an integer such that ;
consequently for and we have and therefore . If and , or if and , we have by definition. Consequently on passing to the quotients the -bilinear mapping of into defines a -bilinear mapping of into . Moreover, it is clear that if (resp. ) is such that, for each (resp. for each ) we have
then necessarily (resp. ). It follows that there is a -linear bijection of onto the dual of , such that for and ; in particular, the finite groups and are isomorphic.
4. Hausdorff quotient groups of
Every Hausdorff quotient group of is of the form , where is a closed subgroup of (Chapter III, § 2, no. 6, Proposition 18). By Corollary 2, Theorem 2 of no. 3, there exists an automorphism of which transforms into a subgroup , the direct sum of a vector subspace generated by of the vectors of the canonical basis and the discrete group generated by of the remaining vectors
Passing to the quotients, induces an isomorphism of onto (Chapter III, § 2, no. 8, Remark 3); now, is isomorphic to (Chapter III, § 2, no. 9, Corollary to Proposition 26). Consequently:
Proposition 9
Every Hausdorff quotient group of is isomorphic to a product group* ().
The product space (and, by abuse of language, the topological group ) is called the n-dimensional torus; by Proposition 4 of Chapter V, § 1, no. 2, is compact, connected and locally connected.
Furthermore, if denotes a closed cube of side 1 in , is homeomorphic to the quotient space of by the equivalence relation " ()" between the points and of . Thus is formed from the cube by "identification of opposite faces".
Proposition 10
The topological group* is locally isomorphic to .
For is isomorphic to (Chapter III, § 2, no. 9, Corollary to Proposition 26) and is a discrete subgroup of (Chapter III, § 2, no. 6, Proposition 19).
It follows that the groups are all locally isomorphic to (); in § 2, no. 2, we shall see that they are the only connected groups which have this property.
5. Subgroups and quotient groups of
Let us identify with , and let be the canonical homomorphism of onto . Every subgroup of is of the form where is a subgroup of which contains and is isomorphic to (Chapter III, § 2, no. 7, Proposition 20); for to be closed in it is necessary and sufficient for to be closed in (Chapter I, § 3, no. 4). Thus in order to find the closed subgroups of we have to determine all the closed subgroups of which contain ; to do this we shall use Proposition 6 of no. 3, and we start by determining the subgroup associated with . Since is associated with itself, we have ; consequently (no. 1) there exists a basis of which generates , and a basis of (with respect to the ring ) consisting of points () such that (), where the are integers satisfying the congruences for . Let be the basis dual to ; then belongs to if and only if for ; in other words, is the direct sum of the vector subspace generated by , and the discrete subgroup generated by the points
Using the same notation, every Hausdorff quotient group of is of the form and is isomorphic to (Chapter III, § 2, no. 7, Corollary to Proposition 22); if is the vector subspace generated by , is isomorphic to (Chapter III, § 2, no. 9, Corollary to Proposition 26), i.e., to . To sum up:
PROPOSITION II. Every closed subgroup of is isomorphic to a group of the form (0 \leq h \leq n) where is a finite abelian group, such that the smallest number of cyclic subgroups of which is a direct sum is . Every Hausdorff quotient group of is isomorphic to a group of the form (0 \leq h \leq n).
In particular ():
Corollary
Every closed subgroup of* , other than itself, is a finite cyclic group. Every Hausdorff quotient group of , other than , is isomorphic to .
6. Periodic functions
DEFINITION I. A function , defined on , with values in an arbitrary set , is said to be periodic if there exists a point in such that
for all . If is periodic, every point for which the relation (1) is an identity in is called a period of .
The set of all periods of a periodic function is clearly a subgroup (which by hypothesis does not consist of 0 alone) of the additive group . If is a continuous periodic mapping of into a Hausdorff topological space , its group of periods is closed. For if denotes the set of all such that for a given point , then is the intersection of the as runs through , and each is closed (Chapter I, § 8, no. 1, Proposition 2). Let be the largest vector subspace contained in (no. 2, Theorem 2); the function is constant on every coset mod ; if is a vector subspace complementary to , then is determined by its restriction to . In other words ( being a topological group isomorphic to for some ), the study of continuous periodic functions on is reduced to the study of such functions whose group of periods is discrete; if this group is of rank , the function is said to be q-ply periodic, and every free system of points which generate is called a principal system of periods of .
If and are two principal systems of periods of , we have seen (no. 1) that each can be obtained from the other by a linear transformation with integer coefficients and determinant .
Let be the canonical mapping of onto ; to every mapping of into a set corresponds the function , which is a periodic mapping of into , having a group of periods which contains ; and conversely every mapping of into which has a group of periods containing is of this form, since it is compatible with the relation (Set Theory, R, , no. 7). In this way we define a bijective mapping of the set of all mappings of into onto the set of all mappings of into whose group of periods contains . For to be continuous ( being a topological space) it is necessary and sufficient that should be continuous (Chapter I, § 3, no. 4, Proposition 6)
Exercises
See the exercises for § 1.