Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0071, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0071].

Algebra, chapter VIII, § 6. Morita Equivalence of Modules and Algebras

— Let A and B be k-algebras, P be an invertible (A,B)k(A, B)_k-bimodule, M and N be B-modules, and u:M→Nu : M \to N be a B-linear mapping. If the mapping 1P⊗u:P⊗BM→P⊗BN1_P \otimes u : P \otimes_B M \to P \otimes_B N is zero (resp. bijective), then so is u.

Let Q be a bimodule inverse to P and θ:Q⊗AP→sBd\theta : Q \otimes_A P \to {}_s B_d an isomorphism of (B,B)k(B, B)_k-bimodules. The lemma follows from the commutativity of the diagram

Q⊗AP⊗BM→1Q⊗1P⊗uQ⊗AP⊗BN↓θ⊗1M↓θ⊗1MM→uN. \begin{array}{ccc} Q \otimes_A P \otimes_B M & \xrightarrow{1_Q \otimes 1_P \otimes u} & Q \otimes_A P \otimes_B N \\ \downarrow \theta \otimes 1_M & & \downarrow \theta \otimes 1_M \\ M & \xrightarrow{u} & N. \end{array}

Theorem 1. — *Let A and B be k-algebras and P an (A,B)k(A, B)_k-bimodule. Denote the (B,A)k(B, A)_k-bimodule Hom⁡A(P,As)\operatorname{Hom}_A(P, A_s) by P∗P^*. The following properties are equivalent:

(i) The (A,B)k(A, B)_k-bimodule P is invertible.

(ii) The A-module P is projective, finitely generated, and generating, and the mapping b↦bPb \mapsto b_P from B to End⁡A(P)∘\operatorname{End}_A(P)^{\circ} is a k-algebra isomorphism.

(iii) The right B-module P is projective, finitely generated, and generating, and the mapping a↦aPa \mapsto a_P from A to End⁡B(P)\operatorname{End}_B(P) is a k-algebra isomorphism.

If these properties hold, then the homomorphisms

Θ:P∗⊗P→sBdandΛ:P⊗P∗→sAd \Theta : P^* \otimes P \to {}_s B_d \quad \text{and} \quad \Lambda : P \otimes P^* \to {}_s A_d

are isomorphisms, so that the (B,A)k(B, A)_k-bimodule P∗P^* is an inverse of P.

If property (ii) holds, then P is an invertible (A,B)k(A, B)_k-bimodule with inverse P∗P^* (VIII, p. 98, Proposition 2 and p. 98, Proposition 3). This proves that (ii) implies (i) and the last assertion.

Suppose that the (A,B)k(A, B)_k-bimodule P is invertible. Then the A-module P is generating (VIII, p. 98, Proposition 3, (iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (i)). It is therefore faithful and balanced (VIII, p. 82, Theorem 2) and, consequently, the mapping a↦apa \mapsto a_p from A to End⁡B(P)\operatorname{End}_B(P) is bijective.

Let us now prove that the mapping b↦bPb \mapsto b_P from B to End⁡A(P)\operatorname{End}_A(P) is bijective. Let Q be a (B,A)k(B, A)_k-bimodule, inverse to P. Let u∈End⁡A(P)u \in \operatorname{End}_A(P); then 1Q⊗u1_Q \otimes u is an endomorphism of the left B-module Q⊗APQ \otimes_A P. Since the (B,B)k(B, B)_k-bimodule Q⊗APQ \otimes_A P is isomorphic to sBd_s B_d, there exists a unique element bb of B such that 1Q⊗u1_Q\otimes u is the homothety with ratio bb of the right B-module Q⊗APQ\otimes_AP. Consequently, we have 1Q⊗(u−bP)=01_Q\otimes (u-b_P) = 0. Hence, u=bPu=b_P by Lemma 1; this proves that the mapping b↦bPb\mapsto b_P from B to EndA(P)_A(P) is bijective.

By Proposition 2 of VIII, p. 98, the A-module P is then projective and finitely generated. We have therefore proved the equivalence of (i) and (ii).

By interchanging the roles of A and B, we obtain the equivalence of (i) and (iii), which concludes the proof of the proposition.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.