Lemma 1
Tag 0071, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0071].
Algebra, chapter VIII, § 6. Morita Equivalence of Modules and Algebras
— Let A and B be k-algebras, P be an invertible -bimodule, M and N be B-modules, and be a B-linear mapping. If the mapping is zero (resp. bijective), then so is u.
Let Q be a bimodule inverse to P and an isomorphism of -bimodules. The lemma follows from the commutativity of the diagram
Theorem 1. — *Let A and B be k-algebras and P an -bimodule. Denote the -bimodule by . The following properties are equivalent:
(i) The -bimodule P is invertible.
(ii) The A-module P is projective, finitely generated, and generating, and the mapping from B to is a k-algebra isomorphism.
(iii) The right B-module P is projective, finitely generated, and generating, and the mapping from A to is a k-algebra isomorphism.
If these properties hold, then the homomorphisms
are isomorphisms, so that the -bimodule is an inverse of P.
If property (ii) holds, then P is an invertible -bimodule with inverse (VIII, p. 98, Proposition 2 and p. 98, Proposition 3). This proves that (ii) implies (i) and the last assertion.
Suppose that the -bimodule P is invertible. Then the A-module P is generating (VIII, p. 98, Proposition 3, (iii) (i)). It is therefore faithful and balanced (VIII, p. 82, Theorem 2) and, consequently, the mapping from A to is bijective.
Let us now prove that the mapping from B to is bijective. Let Q be a -bimodule, inverse to P. Let ; then is an endomorphism of the left B-module . Since the -bimodule is isomorphic to , there exists a unique element of B such that is the homothety with ratio of the right B-module . Consequently, we have . Hence, by Lemma 1; this proves that the mapping from B to End is bijective.
By Proposition 2 of VIII, p. 98, the A-module P is then projective and finitely generated. We have therefore proved the equivalence of (i) and (ii).
By interchanging the roles of A and B, we obtain the equivalence of (i) and (iii), which concludes the proof of the proposition.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- alg-viii-s6-lem-1-cor-2 not in this corpus
- Theorem 2 (Morita), § 6