Proposition 6
Tag 00D5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00D5].
Algebra, VIII, p. 189, § 11. Grothendieck Groups
a) The mapping from to is a weakly additive function of modules.
b) Let G be an abelian group, and let be a weakly additive function of modules. There exists a unique group homomorphism G such that we have for every module E of type .
c) Let E and F be modules of type . We have if and only if there exists a module M of type such that is isomorphic to .
Assertion a) is obvious. Assertion b) follows from (I, §2, No. 4, p. 19, Theorem 1) and assertion c) from (I, §2, No. 4, p. 18, Proposition 6).
Since the mapping from to is a weakly additive function of modules, we can deduce a homomorphism from it. This homomorphism is surjective but is not always an isomorphism (VIII, p. 191, Remark 2).
Let be the subgroup of generated by the elements of the form , where is a split exact sequence of A-modules of type , that is, by the elements of the form cl(E) cl(E) cl(E), where and are modules of type . The canonical mapping from to the quotient group extends to a group homomorphism . This is an isomorphism. Indeed, the canonical mapping from to extends to a group homomorphism from to whose kernel contains , and therefore to a homomorphism by passing to the quotient; it is clear that and are inverse bijections.
An element of is called effective if it is of the form for an A-module E of type . The set of effective elements of is denoted by .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
- I, §2, No. 4, p. 18, Proposition 6 not in this corpus
- I, §2, No. 4, p. 19, Theorem 1 not in this corpus
- VIII, p. 191, Remark 2