Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 00GO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00GO].

Algebra, VIII, p. 254, § 14. Central Simple Algebras

Suppose that B is a semisimple ring that is a finitely generated module over its center Z. Let M and N be (B,A)(B,A)-bimodules. Suppose that they have finite length (which is, in particular, the case when they are right A-modules of finite length). If M and N are isomorphic as (Z,A)(Z,A)-bimodules, then they are isomorphic as (B,A)(B,A)-bimodules.

A) First consider the case when B is the endomorphism ring of a vector space S of finite dimension dd over a commutative field L. We then have Z = L; we view S as a (B(B, Z)-bimodule. The ring B is simple, S is a simple B-module, and Z is the commutant of S; every B-module is isotypical of type S (VIII, p. 122, Proposition 2 a)). Let (V,α)(V, \alpha ) (resp. (W,β)(W, \beta )) be a description of the B-module M (resp. N). The set V (resp. W) is endowed with a (Z(Z, A)-bimodule structure such that α\alpha (resp. β\beta ) is an isomorphism of (B(B, A)-bimodules (VIII, p. 64, Remark 2). As (Z(Z, A)-bimodules, M is isomorphic to VdV^d and N to WdW^d, and there exists an isomorphism from the set of (Z(Z, A)-sub-bimodules of V, ordered by inclusion, to that of the (B(B, A)-sub-bimodules of M (loc. cit.). Hence V is a (Z(Z, A)-bimodule of finite length, and so is W. Since the (Z,A)(Z,A)-bimodules VdV^d and WdW^d are isomorphic, the (Z(Z, A)-bimodules V and W are isomorphic by Theorem 2, d) of VIII, p. 37 applied to the ring Z⊗ZAoZ\otimes_{\mathbf{Z}}A^o. Finally, the (B(B, A)-bimodules M and N are isomorphic.

B) Now consider the case when B is a simple ring that is finitely generated as a Z-module. Then Z is a field, and B is a central simple algebra of finite degree over the field Z. By Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 252, there exists an extension Z′Z' of Z of finite degree over Z such that the Z′Z'-algebra B′=B(Z′)B'= B_{(Z')} is isomorphic to the endomorphism algebra of a finite-dimensional Z′Z'-vector space. Set M′=M(Z′)M'= M_{(Z')} and N′=N(Z′)N'= N_{(Z')}. Then M′M' and N′N' are (B′(B', A)-bimodules of finite length; viewed as (Z′(Z', A)-bimodules, M′M' and N′N' are isomorphic. By the case treated in A),M′A), M' and N′N' are isomorphic as (B′(B', A)-bimodules and a fortiori as (B(B, A)-bimodules. Set r=[Z′:Z]r= [Z': Z]. The (B(B, A)-bimodule M′=Z′⊗ZMM'= Z'\otimes_ZM is isomorphic to MrM^r, and, likewise, the (B(B, A)-bimodule N′N' is isomorphic to NrN^r. Since M and N are (B(B, A)-bimodules of finite length, it follows from Theorem 2, d) of VIII, p. 37 that the (B(B, A)-bimodules M and N are isomorphic.

C) Finally, consider the general case, when B is a semisimple ring that is finitely generated as a Z-module. Let S\mathscr{S} be the set of classes of simple B-modules; it is finite (VIII, p. 136, Proposition 1). For any λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S}, denote by MλM_{\lambda} (resp. NλN_{\lambda}) the isotypical component of type λ\lambda of the B-module M (resp. N); it is a (B(B, A)-sub-bimodule of M (resp. N) (Remark, VIII, p. 67). For λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S}, denote the annihilator of the B-module λ\lambda by bλ\mathfrak{b}_{\lambda}, and set Bλ=B/bλB_{\lambda}= B/\mathfrak{b}_{\lambda}; let ZλZ_{\lambda} be the center of BλB_{\lambda}. For λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S}, the (Bλ(B_{\lambda}, A)-bimodules MλM_{\lambda} and NλN_{\lambda} have finite length. We can then identify B with the product of the simple rings BλB_{\lambda} and Z with the product of the ZλZ_{\lambda} (VIII, p. 141, Proposition 8). Moreover, we can identify M with ∏λ∈SMλ\prod_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}}M_{\lambda} and N with ∏λ∈SNλ\prod_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}}N_{\lambda}. By assumption, M and N are isomorphic as (Z(Z, A)-bimodules; it follows that for λ∈S,Mλ\lambda \in \mathscr{S}, M_{\lambda} and NλN_{\lambda} are isomorphic (Zλ(Z_{\lambda}, A)-bimodules. By the case treated in B), the (Bλ(B_{\lambda}, A)-bimodules MλM_{\lambda} and NλN_{\lambda} are isomorphic, and so the (B(B, A)-bimodules M and N are isomorphic.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.