Bourbaki

Corollary 1

Tag 00IE, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00IE].

Algebra, VIII, p. 288, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group

Let E1\mathscr{E}_1 and E2\mathscr{E}_2 be τ\tau-extensions of G by F, and let ψ\psi be a morphism of τ\tau-extensions from E1\mathscr{E}_1 to E2\mathscr{E}_2. Denote by φ1(\varphi_1(resp. φ2)\varphi_2) the canonical homomorphism for u∗(E1)(u^*(\mathscr{E}_1) (resp. u∗(E2))u^*(\mathscr{E}_2)). Then there exists a unique morphism of τ′\tau '-extensions from u∗(E1)u^*(\mathscr{E}_1) to u∗(E2)u^*(\mathscr{E}_2), denoted by u∗(ψ)u^*(\psi ), such that φ2∘u∗(ψ)=ψ∘φ1\varphi_2\circ u^*(\psi ) =\psi \circ \varphi_1.

It suffices to apply Proposition 1 to ψ∘φ1\psi \circ \varphi_1.

The class of the τ′\tau '-extension u∗(E)u^*(\mathscr{E}) therefore depends only on the class of E\mathscr{E}. We also denote by u∗:u^*: Exτ(G,F)→_{\tau}(G,F)\rightarrow Exτ′(G′,F)_{\tau'}(G',F) the mapping that sends the class of a τ\tau-extension E\mathscr{E} to the class of the τ′\tau '-extension u∗(E)u^*(\mathscr{E}).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.