Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 00IQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00IQ].

Algebra, VIII, p. 296, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group

The mapping cσc_{\sigma} is an element of the group Z2(G,F)Z^2(G,F), and its class in the cohomology group H2(G,F)H^2(G,F) depends only on the class of the τ\tau-extension E\mathscr{E}.

We say that the mapping cσc_{\sigma} is the 2-cocycle associated with σ\sigma and that its cohomology class in H2(G,F)H^2(G,F) is the cohomology class of the τ\tau-extension E\mathscr{E}.

Let us first verify that cσc_{\sigma} satisfies the cocycle condition. Let g1,g2g_1,g_2, and g3g_3 be elements of G. Using formula (1) of VIII, p. 285 and (9), we obtain the relations

ι(g1cσ(g2,g3)cσ(g1,g2g3)) \iota (^{g_1}c_{\sigma}(g_2, g_3)c_{\sigma}(g_1, g_2g_3))
=σ(g1)σ(g2)σ(g3)σ(g2g3)−1σ(g1)−1σ(g1)σ(g2g3)σ(g1g2g3)−1 =\sigma (g_1)\sigma (g_2)\sigma (g_3)\sigma (g_2g_3)^{-1}\sigma (g_1)^{-1}\sigma (g_1)\sigma (g_2g_3)\sigma (g_1g_2g_3)^{-1}
=σ(g1)σ(g2)σ(g3)σ(g1g2g3)−1 =\sigma (g_1)\sigma (g_2)\sigma (g_3)\sigma (g_1g_2g_3)^{-1}

and

ι(cσ(g1,g2)cσ(g1g2,g3)) \iota (c_{\sigma}(g_1, g_2)c_{\sigma}(g_1g_2, g_3))
=σ(g1)σ(g2)σ(g1g2)−1σ(g1g2)σ(g3)σ(g1g2g3)−1 =\sigma (g_1)\sigma (g_2)\sigma (g_1g_2)^{-1}\sigma (g_1g_2)\sigma (g_3)\sigma (g_1g_2g_3)^{-1}
=σ(g1)σ(g2)σ(g3)σ(g1g2g3)−1 =\sigma (g_1)\sigma (g_2)\sigma (g_3)\sigma (g_1g_2g_3)^{-1}

The mapping cσc_{\sigma} is therefore an element of Z2(G,F)Z^2(G,F).

Let us now prove that the image of cσc_{\sigma} in H2(G,F)H^2(G,F) is independent of the chosen section σ\sigma. Let σ\sigma and σ′\sigma ' be such sections. For every element gg of G, there exists a unique element aga_g of F such that σ′(g)=ι(ag)σ(g)\sigma '(g) =\iota (a_g)\sigma (g). Let g1g_1 and g2g_2 be elements of G. Using the definition (9), we obtain the equalities

ι(cσ′(g1,g2))=σ′(g1)σ′(g2)σ′(g1g2)−1 \iota (c_{\sigma'}(g_1, g_2)) =\sigma '(g_1)\sigma '(g_2)\sigma '(g_1g_2)^{-1}
=ι(ag1)σ(g1)ι(ag2)σ(g2)σ(g1g2)−1ι(ag1g2)−1(10) =\iota (a_{g_1})\sigma (g_1)\iota (a_{g_2})\sigma (g_2)\sigma (g_1g_2)^{-1}\iota (a_{g_1g_2})^{-1} \tag{10}
=ι(ag1)ι(g1ag2)ι(cσ(g1,g2))ι(ag1g2)−1 =\iota (a_{g_1})\iota (^{g_1}a_{g_2})\iota (c_{\sigma}(g_1, g_2))\iota (a_{g_1g_2})^{-1}

Since the group F is commutative, we have the relations

cσ′(g1,g2)cσ(g1,g2)−1=(g1ag2)ag1g2−1ag1=(∂a)(g1,g2)(11) c_{\sigma'}(g_1, g_2)c_{\sigma}(g_1, g_2)^{-1}= (^{g_1}a_{g_2})a^{-1}_{g_1g_2}a_{g_1}= (\partial a)(g_1, g_2) \tag{11}

as follows from (8). This proves that the classes of cσ′c_{\sigma'} and cσc_{\sigma} in H2(G,F)H^2(G,F) coincide.

Finally, let E=(Γ,ι,π)\mathscr{E}= (\Gamma , \iota , \pi ) and E′=(Γ′,ι′,π′)\mathscr{E}'= (\Gamma ', \iota ', \pi ') be isomorphic τ\tau-extensions, let u:E→E′u:\mathscr{E}\rightarrow \mathscr{E}' be a morphism of τ\tau-extensions, and let σ\sigma be a section of the mapping π\pi. The mapping u∘σu\circ \sigma is a section of the mapping π′\pi ', and we have cσ=cu∘σc_{\sigma}=c_{u\circ\sigma}. The class of cσc_{\sigma} in H2(G,F)H^2(G,F) therefore depends only on the class of E\mathscr{E} in Exτ(G,F)_{\tau}(G,F).

We denote by Θτ\Theta_{\tau} : Exτ(G,F)→H2(G,F)_{\tau}(G,F)\rightarrow H^2(G,F), or more simply Θ, the mapping that sends the class of a τ\tau-extension (Γ,ι,π)(\Gamma , \iota , \pi ) to the class of the 2-cocycle cσc_{\sigma}, where σ\sigma is a section of the surjection π\pi.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.