Bourbaki

Lemma 6

Tag 00IV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00IV].

Algebra, VIII, p. 301, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group

Let cc be a 2-cocycle of H with values in F. The image of c~s\widetilde{c}_s in the group H2(G,F)H^2(G,F) does not depend on the choice of the section ss.

Let s′s' be a section of the canonical surjection from G to H\GH\backslash G. Let h:H\G→Hh: H\backslash G\rightarrow H be the mapping characterized by the relation

s′(x)=h(x)s(x) s'(x) =h(x)s(x)

for x∈H\Gx\in H\backslash G. The 2-cocycle c~s′\widetilde{c}_{s'} is then given by the relations

c~s′(g1,g2) \widetilde{c}_{s'}(g_1, g_2)
=∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1h(x)−1c(h(x)s(x)g1s′(x⋅g1)−1,s′(x⋅g1)g2s′(x⋅g1g2)−1) =\prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}h(x)^{-1}}c(h(x)s(x)g_1s'(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, s'(x\cdot g_1)g_2s'(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})
=∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1c(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1)−1h(x⋅g1)−1,h(x⋅g1)s(x⋅g1)g2s′(x⋅g1g2)−1) =\prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}}c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}h(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, h(x\cdot g_1)s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s'(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})
s(x)−1(−1′′−1−1s(x)^{-1}(-1''-1-1
×∏x∈H\Gc(h(x),s(x)g1g2s(x⋅g1g2)) \times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}c(h(x), s(x)g_1g_2s(x\cdot g_1g_2))
×c(h(x)−1,s′(x)g1s′(x⋅g1)−1)) \times c(h(x)^{-1}, s'(x)g_1s'(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}))
=∏x∈H\Gg1s(x⋅g1)−1c(h(x⋅g1)−1,h(x⋅g1)s(x⋅g1)g2s′(x⋅g1g2)−1)=\prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}}c(h(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, h(x\cdot g_1)s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s'(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})
×∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1c(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1)−1,s(x⋅g1)g2s′(x⋅g1g2)−1) \times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}}c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s'(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})
s(x)−1−1−1−1s(x)^{-1}-1-1-1 ×∏x∈H\Gc(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1),h(x⋅g1))\times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1), h(x\cdot g_1))
×∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1(c(h(x)−1,s′(x)g1g2s′(x⋅g1g2)−1)−1 \times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}}(c(h(x)^{-1}, s'(x)g_1g_2s'(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})^{-1}
×c(h(x)−1,s′(x)g1s′(x⋅g1)−1)) \times c(h(x)^{-1}, s'(x)g_1s'(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}))
=∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1c(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1)−1,s(x⋅g1)g2s′(x⋅g1g2)−1)=\prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}}c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s'(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1}) s(x)−1−1−1−1s(x)^{-1}-1-1-1 ×∏x∈H\Gc(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1),h(x⋅g1))\times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1), h(x\cdot g_1)) ×∏x∈H\Gg1s(x)−1c(h(x)−1,h(x)s(x)g2s′(x⋅g2)−1)\times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{g_1s(x)^{-1}}c(h(x)^{-1}, h(x)s(x)g_2s'(x\cdot g_2)^{-1}) s(x)−1(−1′′−1−1s(x)^{-1}(-1''-1-1
×∏x∈H\Gc(h(x),s(x)g1g2s(x⋅g1g2)) \times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}c(h(x), s(x)g_1g_2s(x\cdot g_1g_2))
×c(h(x)−1,s′(x)g1s′(x⋅g1)−1)) \times c(h(x)^{-1}, s'(x)g_1s'(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}))

for all g1,g2∈Gg_1, g_2\in G. The first equality comes from the cocycle relation (VIII, p. 295, formula (7)) applied to the elements

h(x)−1,h(x)s(x)g1s′(x⋅g1)−1h(x)^{-1},h(x)s(x)g_1s'(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, and s′(x⋅g1)g2s′(x⋅g1g2)−1s'(x\cdot g_1)g_2s'(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1};

the second is obtained by applying the cocycle relation to the elements

s(x)g1s(x⋅g1)−1,h(x⋅g1)−1s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1},h(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, and h(x⋅g1)s(x⋅g1)g2s′(x⋅g1g2)−1h(x\cdot g_1)s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s'(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1}; and the last simply uses the fact that the mapping x↦x⋅g1x\mapsto x\cdot g_1 is a permutation of H\GH\backslash G.

The last two lines of the obtained expression correspond to a 2-coboundary. We find that c~s′\widetilde{c}_{s'} has the same class in H2(G,F)H^2(G,F) as the cocycle whose value in (g1,g2)∈G2(g_1, g_2)\in G^2 is given by the expression

∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1c(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1)−1,s(x⋅g1)g2s(x⋅g1g2)−1h(x⋅g1g2)−1) \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}}c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1}h(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})
s(x)−1−1−1−1s(x)^{-1}-1-1-1
×∏x∈H\Gc(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1),h(x⋅g1)) \times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1), h(x\cdot g_1))
=∏x∈H\Gg1s(x⋅g1)−1c(s(x⋅g1)g2s(x⋅g1g2)−1,h(x⋅g1g2)−1)−1=\prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}}c(s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1}, h(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})^{-1}
×∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1c(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1)−1,s(x⋅g1)g2s(x⋅g1g2)−1) \times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}}c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})
×∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1(c(s(x)g1g2s(x⋅g1g2)−1,h(x⋅g1g2)−1) \times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}}(c(s(x)g_1g_2s(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1}, h(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})
−1−1−1)-1-1-1) ×c(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1),h(x⋅g1))\times c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1), h(x\cdot g_1)) =∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1c(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1)−1,s(x⋅g1)g2s(x⋅g1g2)−1)=\prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}}c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1}) gs(x)−1−1−1−1gs(x)^{-1}-1-1-1
×∏x∈H\G1c(s(x)g2s(x⋅g2),h(x⋅g2)) \times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G^1}c(s(x)g_2s(x\cdot g_2), h(x\cdot g_2))
×∏x∈H\Gs(x)−1(c(s(x)g1g2s(x⋅g1g2)−1,h(x⋅g1g2)−1) \times \prod_{x\in H\backslash G}^{s(x)^{-1}}(c(s(x)g_1g_2s(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1}, h(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1})
×c(s(x)g1s(x⋅g1)−1,h(x⋅g1)−1)−1) \times c(s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1}, h(x\cdot g_1)^{-1})^{-1})

where the first equality follows from the cocycle relation applied to the elements

s(x)g1s(x⋅g1)−1,s(x⋅g1)g2s(x⋅g1g2)−1s(x)g_1s(x\cdot g_1)^{-1},s(x\cdot g_1)g_2s(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1}, and h(x⋅g1g2)−1h(x\cdot g_1g_2)^{-1}.

The last two lines of the obtained expression correspond to a 2-coboundary. We find that the class of c~s′\widetilde{c}_{s'} coincides with that of c~s\widetilde{c}_s.

We have constructed a homomorphism from the group H2(H,F)H^2(H,F) to the group H2(G,F)H^2(G,F), which we call the corestriction homomorphism from H to G and denote by CorHG^G_H.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.