Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 00NW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00NW].

Algebra, VIII, p. 412, § 21. Linear Representations of Finite Groups

Let ff be a mapping from G to K. The following assertions are equivalent:

(i) There are an element λ\lambda of G^\widehat{G} and an element aa of K such that f=aχλf=a\chi_{\lambda}.

(ii) For every pair (g,g′)(g, g') of elements of G, we have

f(g)f(g′)=∣G∣−1f(1)∑h∈Gf(hgh−1g′)(34) f(g)f(g') =|G|^{-1}f(1)\sum_{h\in G}f(hgh^{-1}g') \tag{34}

Let λ\lambda be an element of G^\widehat{G}; for every endomorphism uu of VλV_{\lambda}, set

u♮=∣G∣−1∑h∈Gπλ(h)uπλ(h−1)(35) u^{\natural}=|G|^{-1}\sum_{h\in G}\pi_{\lambda}(h)u \pi_{\lambda}(h^{-1}) \tag{35}

The endomorphism u♮u^{\natural} of VλV_{\lambda} is K[G]-linear. By Schur’s lemma (VIII, p. 47, Theorem 1),u♮,u^{\natural} is a homothety. Since uu and u♮u^{\natural} have the same trace, we therefore have

u♮=dλ−1u^{\natural}=d^{-1}_{\lambda} Tr(uu) 1Vλ1_{V_{\lambda}}.

Let uu and vv be endomorphisms of VλV_{\lambda}; it follows that

(36) Tr(uu) Tr(vv) =dλ=d_{\lambda} Tr(u♮vu^{\natural}v) =dλ∣G∣−1∑h∈G=d_{\lambda}|G|^{-1}\sum_{h\in G} Tr(πλ(h)uπλ(h−1)v\pi_{\lambda}(h)u \pi_{\lambda}(h^{-1})v).

Take u=πλ(g)u=\pi_{\lambda}(g) and v=πλ(g′)v=\pi_{\lambda}(g') in formula (36); relation (34) for f=χλf=\chi_{\lambda} follows.

Conversely, suppose that assertion (ii) holds. If we have f(1)=0f(1) = 0, then it follows that f(g)f(g′)=0f(g)f(g') = 0 for every pair (g,g′)(g, g') of elements of G, and therefore f=0f= 0. We can therefore assume f(1)≠0f(1)\not= 0. Taking g′=1g'= 1 in (34), we obtain the relation

f(g)=∣G∣−1∑h∈Gf(hgh−1) f(g) =|G|^{-1}\sum_{h\in G}f(hgh^{-1})

for every g∈Gg\in G, which implies that ff is a central function. By Proposition 5, there exists a family (aλ)(a_{\lambda}) of elements of K such that f=∑λ∈G^aλχλf=\sum_{\lambda\in\widehat{G}}a_{\lambda}\chi_{\lambda}. Let us replace ff with this expression in formula (34); taking into account that each of the characters χλ\chi_{\lambda} also satisfies this relation, we find

∑λ,μ∈G^aλaμχλ(g)χμ(g′)=∑λ∈G^aλdλ−1f(1)χλ(g)χλ(g′)(37) \sum_{\lambda ,\mu\in\widehat{G}}a_{\lambda}a_\mu\chi_{\lambda}(g)\chi_\mu(g') =\sum_{\lambda\in\widehat{G}}a_{\lambda}d^{-1}_{\lambda}f(1)\chi_{\lambda}(g)\chi_{\lambda}(g') \tag{37}

for g,g′∈Gg, g'\in G. This relation can also be written as

∑λ,μ(aλaμ−δλμaλdλ−1f(1))χλ(g)χμ(g′)=0(38) \sum_{\lambda ,\mu}(a_{\lambda}a_\mu-\delta_{\lambda \mu}a_{\lambda}d^{-1}_{\lambda}f(1))\chi_{\lambda}(g)\chi_\mu(g') = 0 \tag{38}

for g,g′∈Gg, g'\in G. Now, the functions χλ\chi_{\lambda}, for λ∈G^\lambda \in \widehat{G}, are linearly independent (Proposition 5 of VIII, p. 411); it follows that

aλaμ=δλμaλdλ−1f(1) a_{\lambda}a_\mu=\delta_{\lambda \mu}a_{\lambda}d^{-1}_{\lambda}f(1)

for λ,μ∈G^\lambda , \mu\in \widehat{G}. In particular, aλaμ=0a_{\lambda}a_\mu= 0 whenever λ≠μ\lambda \not=\mu. Consequently, there exists at most one element λ\lambda of G^\widehat{G} such that aλ≠0a_{\lambda}\not= 0, and we have f=aλχλf=a_{\lambda}\chi_{\lambda}, and therefore (i).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.