Let f be a mapping from G to K. The following assertions are equivalent:
(i) There are an element λ of G and an element a of K such that f=aχλ.
(ii) For every pair (g,g′) of elements of G, we have
f(g)f(g′)=∣G∣−1f(1)h∈G∑f(hgh−1g′)(34)
Let λ be an element of G; for every endomorphism u of Vλ, set
u♮=∣G∣−1h∈G∑πλ(h)uπλ(h−1)(35)
The endomorphism u♮ of Vλ is K[G]-linear. By Schur’s lemma (VIII, p. 47, Theorem 1),u♮ is a homothety. Since u and u♮ have the same trace, we therefore have
u♮=dλ−1 Tr(u) 1Vλ.
Let u and v be endomorphisms of Vλ; it follows that
Take u=πλ(g) and v=πλ(g′) in formula (36); relation (34) for f=χλ follows.
Conversely, suppose that assertion (ii) holds. If we have f(1)=0, then it follows that f(g)f(g′)=0 for every pair (g,g′) of elements of G, and therefore f=0. We can therefore assume f(1)=0. Taking g′=1 in (34), we obtain the relation
f(g)=∣G∣−1h∈G∑f(hgh−1)
for every g∈G, which implies that f is a central function. By Proposition 5, there exists a family (aλ) of elements of K such that f=∑λ∈Gaλχλ. Let us replace f with this expression in formula (34); taking into account that each of the characters χλ also satisfies this relation, we find
for g,g′∈G. Now, the functions χλ, for λ∈G, are linearly independent (Proposition 5 of VIII, p. 411); it follows that
aλaμ=δλμaλdλ−1f(1)
for λ,μ∈G. In particular, aλaμ=0 whenever λ=μ. Consequently, there exists at most one element λ of G such that aλ=0, and we have f=aλχλ, and therefore (i).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.