Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 00QM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00QM].

Algebra, VIII, p. 461, Appendix 3. Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz

Let A be an integral domain, K be its field of fractions, and L be a commutative K-algebra. Suppose that the A-algebra L is generated by finitely many elements and that L is a field.

a) The degree of L over K is finite.

b) There exists a nonzero element aa of A such that K is equal to A[a−1]A[a^{-1}].

Let S be a generating subset of the A-algebra L. We use induction on the cardinal of S.

First, suppose that the elements of S are all algebraic over K. The degree of L over K is then finite (V, §3, No. 2, p. 18, Theorem 2). Let (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i\in I} be a basis of L over K. There exists a nonzero element aa of A such that the coordinates with respect to this basis of the elements of S, of the element 1, and of the elements eieje_ie_j for i,ji,j in I belong to A[a−1]A[a^{-1}]. The set of linear combinations ∑i∈Iaiei\sum_{i\in I}a_ie_i with ai∈A[a−1]a_i\in A[a^{-1}] for every ii is then a subring of L. It contains A and S by construction and is therefore equal to L. In particular, it contains Ke1Ke_1, so K is equal to A[a−1]A[a^{-1}].

Now suppose that an element ss of S is transcendental over K. Denote by E the field of fractions of the ring A[s]A[s]. The A[sA[s]-algebra L is generated by S −{s}-\{s\}. By the induction hypothesis, there exists a nonzero polynomial P∈A[X]P\in A[X] such that E is equal to A[s][P(s)−1]A[s][P(s)^{-1}]. Let K‾\overline{K} be an algebraic closure of K (V, §4, No. 3, p. 23, Theorem 2). Since the field K‾\overline{K} is infinite (V, §4, No. 1, p. 20, Proposition 3), there exists an element xx of K‾\overline{K} such that P(x)≠0P(x)\not= 0. Let φ:E→K\varphi : E\rightarrow K be the unique homomorphism from the K-algebra E=A[s][P(s)−1]E = A[s][P(s)^{-1}] to the K-algebra K‾\overline{K} that sends ss to xx. This is absurd because E is a transcendental extension of K and K‾\overline{K} is an algebraic extension of K. This completes the proof of the theorem.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • V, §3, No. 2, p. 18, Theorem 2 not in this corpus
  • V, §4, No. 1, p. 20, Proposition 3 not in this corpus
  • V, §4, No. 3, p. 23, Theorem 2 not in this corpus
Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.