Theorem 1
Tag 00QM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00QM].
Algebra, VIII, p. 461, Appendix 3. Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz
Let A be an integral domain, K be its field of fractions, and L be a commutative K-algebra. Suppose that the A-algebra L is generated by finitely many elements and that L is a field.
a) The degree of L over K is finite.
b) There exists a nonzero element of A such that K is equal to .
Let S be a generating subset of the A-algebra L. We use induction on the cardinal of S.
First, suppose that the elements of S are all algebraic over K. The degree of L over K is then finite (V, §3, No. 2, p. 18, Theorem 2). Let be a basis of L over K. There exists a nonzero element of A such that the coordinates with respect to this basis of the elements of S, of the element 1, and of the elements for in I belong to . The set of linear combinations with for every is then a subring of L. It contains A and S by construction and is therefore equal to L. In particular, it contains , so K is equal to .
Now suppose that an element of S is transcendental over K. Denote by E the field of fractions of the ring . The ]-algebra L is generated by S . By the induction hypothesis, there exists a nonzero polynomial such that E is equal to . Let be an algebraic closure of K (V, §4, No. 3, p. 23, Theorem 2). Since the field is infinite (V, §4, No. 1, p. 20, Proposition 3), there exists an element of such that . Let be the unique homomorphism from the K-algebra to the K-algebra that sends to . This is absurd because E is a transcendental extension of K and is an algebraic extension of K. This completes the proof of the theorem.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- V, §3, No. 2, p. 18, Theorem 2 not in this corpus
- V, §4, No. 1, p. 20, Proposition 3 not in this corpus
- V, §4, No. 3, p. 23, Theorem 2 not in this corpus