Proposition 1
Tag 00QZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00QZ].
Algebra, VIII, p. 46, § 3. Simple Modules
Let A be a ring.
a) Let be a left ideal of A. The A-module is simple if and only if is a maximal left ideal.
b) Let M be a simple A-module, and let be a nonzero element of M. We have the equality , the annihilator of is a maximal left ideal of A, and the mapping defines, by passing to the quotient, an isomorphism from to M.
c) Let M be a nonzero A-module. If we have for every nonzero element of M, then M is simple.
The submodules of are of the form , where is a left ideal of A containing (I, §4, No. 6, p. 41, Theorem 4); consequently, the A-module is simple if and only if we have and every left ideal of A containing satisfies or , that is, or . This proves a).
Under the assumptions of b), is a nonzero submodule of M, hence is equal to M. Consequently, the mapping defines, by passing to the quotient, an isomorphism from to M; the A-module is therefore simple, and the left ideal is maximal by a). This proves b).
Under the assumptions of c), let N be a nonzero submodule of M. If is a nonzero element of N, then we have and , and therefore M = N. Hence M is simple.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- I, §4, No. 6, p. 41, Theorem 4 not in this corpus