Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 00SM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00SM].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VII, § 1. Primary decomposition of linear representations

Let x,y∈x, y\in End(V).

(i) Assume that V is finite dimensional. Then xx is triangularizable if and only if V=∑a∈kVa(x)V =\sum_{a\in k}V^a(x).

(ii) If there exists an integer nn such that (ad xx)ny=0^ny= 0, each Va(x)V^a(x) is stable under yy.

(iii) Assume that V is finite dimensional. If V=∑a∈kVa(x)V =\sum_{a\in k}V^a(x) and if each

Va(x)V^a(x) is stable under yy, there exists an integer nn such that (ad xx)ny=0^ny= 0.

Part (i) follows from Algebra, Chap. VII, §5, no. 2, Prop. 3.

Let E = End(V). Let B be the bilinear map (u,v)→u(v)(u, v) \rightarrow u(v) from E×VE\times V to V. By the definition of ad xx,

x(B(u,v))=B(u,x(v))+x(B(u, v)) =B(u, x(v)) + B((ad xx)(u),v(u), v)

for x∈E,u∈E,v∈Vx\in E,u\in E,v\in V. Let xx operate on E via ad xx. By Prop. 2 (ii), B(E0(x),Va(x))⊂Va(x)B(E^0(x),V^a(x))\subset V^a(x) for all a∈ka\in k. If (ad xx)ny=0^ny= 0, then y∈E0(x)y\in E^0(x), so y(Va(x))⊂Va(x)y(V^a(x))\subset V^a(x), which proves (ii).

To prove (iii), we can replace V by Va(x)V^a(x) and xx (resp. yy) by its restriction to Va(x)V^a(x). Replacing xx by x−ax-a, we can assume that xx is nilpotent. Then, (ad xx)2dimV−1=0^{2 dim V-1}= 0 (Chap. I, §4, no. 2), which proves (iii).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.