Let V,V′,W be vector spaces. Let r : S → End(V), r′:S→ End(V′) and q:S→ End(W) be maps.
(i) Let f:V→W be a linear map such that q(s)f(v)=f(r(s)v) for s∈S and v∈V. Then, for all λ∈P,f maps Vλ(S) (resp. Vλ(S)) into Wλ(S) (resp. Wλ(S)).
(ii) Let B:V×V′→W be a bilinear map such that
q(s)B(v,v′)=B(r(s)v,v′)+B(v,r′(s)v′)
for s∈S,v∈V,v′∈V′. Then, for all λ,μ∈P, B maps Vλ(S)×V′μ(S) (resp. Vλ(S)×Vμ′(S)) into Wλ+μ(S) (resp. Wλ+μ(S)).
(iii) Let B:V×V′→W be a bilinear map such that
q(s)B(v,v′)=B(r(s)v,r′(s)v′)
for s∈S,v∈V,v′∈V′. Then, for all λ,μ∈P, B maps Vλ(S)×V′μ(S) (resp. Vλ(S)×Vμ′(S)) into Wλμ(S) (resp. Wλμ(S)).
In case (i), (q(s)−λ(s))nf(v)=f((r(s)−λ(s))nv) for s∈S and v∈V, hence the conclusion. In case (ii),
(q(s)−λ(s)−μ(s))B(v,v′)=B((r(s)−λ(s))v,v′)+B(v,(r′(s)−μ(s))v′)
for s∈S,v∈V,v′∈V′, hence by induction on n
(q(s)−λ(s)−μ(s))nB(v,v)=∑B((r(s)−λ(s))iv,(r(s)−μ(s))jv).
i+j=n
The assertions in (ii) follow immediately. In case (iii), (q(s)−λ(s)μ(s))B(v,v′)=B((r(s)−λ(s))v,r′(s)v′)+B(λ(s)v,(r′(s)−μ(s))v′) for s∈S,v∈V,v′∈V′, hence by induction on n
(q(s)−λ(s)μ(s))nB(v,v′)
= ∑(n)B(λ(s)j(r(s)−λ(s))iv,r′(s)i(r′(s)−μ(s))jv′).
i+j=n
The assertions in (iii) follow immediately.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.