Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 00SK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00SK].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VII, § 1. Primary decomposition of linear representations

Let V,V′,WV,V',W be vector spaces. Let rr : S →\rightarrow End(V), r′:S→r': S\rightarrow End(V′') and q:S→q: S\rightarrow End(W) be maps.

(i) Let f:V→Wf: V\rightarrow W be a linear map such that q(s)f(v)=f(r(s)v)q(s)f(v) =f(r(s)v) for s∈Ss\in S and v∈Vv\in V. Then, for all λ∈P,f\lambda \in P,f maps Vλ(S)V^{\lambda}(S) (resp. Vλ(S)V_{\lambda}(S)) into Wλ(S)W^{\lambda}(S) (resp. Wλ(S)W_{\lambda}(S)).

(ii) Let B:V×V′→WB : V\times V'\rightarrow W be a bilinear map such that

q(s)B(v,v′)=B(r(s)v,v′)+B(v,r′(s)v′) q(s)B(v, v') = B(r(s)v, v') + B(v, r'(s)v')

for s∈S,v∈V,v′∈V′s\in S,v\in V,v'\in V'. Then, for all λ,μ∈P\lambda , \mu\in P, B maps Vλ(S)×V′μ(S)V^{\lambda}(S)\times {V'}^\mu(S) (resp. Vλ(S)×Vμ′(S)V_{\lambda}(S)\times V'_\mu(S)) into Wλ+μ(S)W^{\lambda+\mu}(S) (resp. Wλ+μ(S)W_{\lambda+\mu}(S)).

(iii) Let B:V×V′→WB : V\times V'\rightarrow W be a bilinear map such that

q(s)B(v,v′)=B(r(s)v,r′(s)v′) q(s)B(v, v') = B(r(s)v, r'(s)v')

for s∈S,v∈V,v′∈V′s\in S,v\in V,v'\in V'. Then, for all λ,μ∈P\lambda , \mu\in P, B maps Vλ(S)×V′μ(S)V^{\lambda}(S)\times {V'}^\mu(S) (resp. Vλ(S)×Vμ′(S)V_{\lambda}(S)\times V'_\mu(S)) into Wλμ(S)W^{\lambda \mu}(S) (resp. Wλμ(S)W_{\lambda \mu}(S)).

In case (i), (q(s)−λ(s))nf(v)=f((r(s)−λ(s))nv)(q(s)-\lambda (s))^nf(v) =f((r(s)-\lambda (s))^nv) for s∈Ss\in S and v∈Vv\in V, hence the conclusion. In case (ii),

(q(s)−λ(s)−μ(s))B(v,v′)=B((r(s)−λ(s))v,v′)+B(v,(r′(s)−μ(s))v′) (q(s)-\lambda (s)-\mu(s))B(v, v') = B((r(s)-\lambda (s))v, v') + B(v,(r'(s)-\mu(s))v')

for s∈S,v∈V,v′∈V′s\in S,v\in V,v'\in V', hence by induction on nn

′(n)′′ '(n)''

(q(s)−λ(s)−μ(s))nB(v,v)=∑B((r(s)−λ(s))iv,(r(s)−μ(s))jv)(q(s)-\lambda (s)-\mu(s))^nB(v, v) =\sum B((r(s)-\lambda (s))^iv,(r(s)-\mu(s))^jv).

i i
i+j=ni+j=n

The assertions in (ii) follow immediately. In case (iii), (q(s)−λ(s)μ(s))B(v,v′)=B((r(s)−λ(s))v,r′(s)v′)+B(λ(s)v,(r′(s)−μ(s))v′)(q(s)-\lambda (s)\mu(s))B(v, v') = B((r(s)-\lambda (s))v, r'(s)v')+B(\lambda (s)v,(r'(s)-\mu(s))v') for s∈S,v∈V,v′∈V′s\in S,v\in V,v'\in V', hence by induction on nn

(q(s)−λ(s)μ(s))nB(v,v′) (q(s)-\lambda (s)\mu(s))^nB(v, v')

= ∑(n)B(λ(s)j(r(s)−λ(s))iv,r′(s)i(r′(s)−μ(s))jv′)\sum(n)B(\lambda (s)^j(r(s)-\lambda (s))^iv, r'(s)^i(r'(s)-\mu(s))^jv').

i i
i+j=ni+j=n

The assertions in (iii) follow immediately.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.