Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 00SZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00SZ].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VII, § 1. Primary decomposition of linear representations

Let h\mathfrak{h} be a nilpotent Lie algebra, and M a finite dimensional h\mathfrak{h}-module such that M0(h)=0M^0(\mathfrak{h}) = 0. Let f:h→Mf:\mathfrak{h}\rightarrow M be a linear map such that

f([x,y])=x.f(y)−y.f(x)f([x, y]) =x.f(y)-y.f(x) for x,y∈hx, y\in \mathfrak{h}.

There exists a∈Ma\in M such that f(x)=x.af(x) =x.a for all x∈hx\in \mathfrak{h}.

Let N=M×kN = M\times k. Make h\mathfrak{h} operate on N by the formula

x.(m,λ)=(x.m−λf(x),0) x.(m, \lambda ) = (x.m-\lambda f(x),0)

The identity satisfied by ff implies that N is an h\mathfrak{h}-module (Chap. I, §1, no. 8, Example 2). The map (m,λ)→λ(m, \lambda ) \rightarrow \lambda from N to kk is a homomorphism from N to the trivial h\mathfrak{h}-module kk. By Prop. 9 (iv), it follows that N0(h)N^0(\mathfrak{h}) contains an element of the form (a,1)(a,1) with a∈Ma\in M. In view of the hypothesis on M,

(M×0)∩N0(h)=0 (M\times 0)\cap N^0(\mathfrak{h}) = 0

so N0(h)N^0(\mathfrak{h}) is of dimension 1 and hence is annihilated by h\mathfrak{h}. Thus, x.a−f(x)=0x.a-f(x) = 0 for all x∈hx\in \mathfrak{h}, which proves the corollary.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • Chap. I, §1, no. 8, Example 2 not in this corpus
  • Prop. 9
Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.