Bourbaki

Exercise 9, § 1

Tag 00TG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00TG].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, VII, 54

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

We retain the notations of the preceding exercise, and assume further that g\mathfrak{g} is nilpotent.

a) Show that the basis (e1,...,en)(e_1, . . . , e_n) can be chosen so that, for any pair (i,j)(i, j), [ei,ej][e_i, e_j] is a linear combination of the ehe_h for h>h > sup(i,ji, j). Assume from now on that the eie_i satisfy this condition. For i=1,...,ni= 1, . . . , n choose a power q(i)q(i) of pp such that ad(eie_i)q(i)=0^{q(i)}= 0, and put zi=eiq(i),A=k[z1,...,zn]z_i=e_i^{q(i)},A =k[z_1, . . . , z_n], cf. Exerc. 8. b) Let ρ:g→gl(V)\rho :\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}(V) be a linear representation of g\mathfrak{g}. Assume that ρ(ei)\rho (e_i) is nilpotent for i=1,...,ni= 1, . . . , n. Show that ρ(x)\rho (x) is nilpotent for all x∈gx\in \mathfrak{g}. (Argue by induction on n=n= dim g\mathfrak{g} and reduce to the case where ρ\rho is irreducible. Show that, in this case, ρ(en)=0\rho (e_n) = 0 and apply the induction hypothesis.)

c) Let ρ1:g→gl(V1)\rho_1:\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}(V_1) and ρ2:g→gl(V2)\rho_2:\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}(V_2) be two linear representations of g\mathfrak{g}. Assume that V1V_1 and V2V_2 are ≠0\not= 0, and that V1=Vλ1(g),V2=Vλ2(g)V_1= V^{\lambda_1}(\mathfrak{g}),V_2= V^{\lambda_2}(\mathfrak{g}), where λ1\lambda_1 and λ2\lambda_2 are two functions on g\mathfrak{g}, cf. no. 3. Show that, if λ1(ei)=λ2(ei)\lambda_1(e_i) =\lambda_2(e_i) for i=1,...,ni= 1, . . . , n, then λ1=λ2\lambda_1=\lambda_2 and there exists a non-zero g\mathfrak{g}-homomorphism from V1V_1 to V2V_2 (apply bb) to the g\mathfrak{g}-module V=L(V1,V2)V =\mathscr{L}(V_1,V_2) and use Engel’s theorem to show that V contains a non-zero g\mathfrak{g}-invariant element). Deduce that if, in addition, V1V_1 and V2V_2 are simple, they are isomorphic.

d) Assume that kk is algebraically closed. Let R be the set of equivalence classes of irreducible representations of g\mathfrak{g}. If ρ∈R\rho \in R, put

xρ=(xρ(1),...,xρ(n))∈kn x_{\rho}= (x_{\rho}(1), . . . , x_{\rho}(n))\in k^n

where xρ(i)x_{\rho}(i) is the unique eigenvalue of ρ(ei)\rho (e_i). Show that ρ→xρ\rho \rightarrow x_{\rho} is a bijection from R to knk^n. (Injectivity follows from cc), and surjectivity from Exerc. 8d).)8d).) Deduce the following consequences:

(i) For any maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m} of A, the quotient of U/mUU/\mathfrak{m}U by its radical is a matrix algebra.

(ii) The degree of any irreducible representation of g\mathfrak{g} is a power of pp (this follows from (i) and the fact that [U/mU:k][U/\mathfrak{m}U :k] is a power of pp).

(iii) Every homomorphism from A to kk extends uniquely to a homomorphism from C to kk (use the fact that C/mCC/\mathfrak{m}C is contained in the centre of U/mUU/\mathfrak{m}U, which is a local kk-algebra with residue field kk).

(iv) There exists an integer N≥0N\geq 0 such that xpN∈Ax^{p^N}\in A for all x∈Cx\in C (this follows from (iii)).6^6

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.