Let a∈G and let W be a neighbourhood of e in G. There exists a neighbourhood V of a with the following property: for all a′∈V, there exists an element g∈W such that g1(a′)⊂ Ad(g)g1(a).
Put g1=g1(a) and let g=g1+g+ be the Fitting decomposition of Ad(a)−1(§1, no. 1). Let H be a Lie subgroup germ of G with Lie algebra g1. For all h∈H, Ad(h)g1⊂g1. Since [g1,g+]⊂g+, there exists a neighbourhood U of e in H such that Ad(h)g+⊂g+ for all h∈H. Since the restriction of Ad(a)−1 to g+ is bijective, U can be chosen so that the restriction of Ad(ah)−1 to g+ is bijective for all h∈U. Then g1(ah)⊂g1(a)=g1 for all h∈U. By Proposition 4, Int(W)(aU) is a neighbourhood of a in G. If a′∈ Int(W)(aU), then a′=g(ah)g−1 with g∈W and h∈U; it follows that g1(a′)= Ad(g)g1(ah)⊂ Ad(g)g1(a).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.