Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 00Z0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00Z0].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 2. Root system of a split semi-simple Lie algebra

Let g\mathfrak{g} be a semi-simple Lie algebra, h1\mathfrak{h}_1 and h2\mathfrak{h}_2 splitting Cartan subalgebras of g\mathfrak{g}. There exists an isomorphism from h1∗\mathfrak{h}^*_1 to h2∗\mathfrak{h}^*_2 that takes R(g,h1)R(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}_1) to R(g,h2)R(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}_2).

(For more precise results, see §3, no. 3, Cor. of Prop. 10, and §5, no. 3, Prop. 5).

Let k′k' be an algebraic closure of k,g′=g⊗kk′,hi′=hi⊗kk′k,\mathfrak{g}'=\mathfrak{g}\otimes_kk',\mathfrak{h}'_i=\mathfrak{h}_i\otimes_kk'. Then R(g′,hi′)R(\mathfrak{g}',\mathfrak{h}'_i) is the image of R(g,hi)R(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}_i) under the map λ→λ⊗1\lambda \rightarrow \lambda \otimes 1 from hi∗\mathfrak{h}^*_i to hi∗⊗kk′=hi′∗\mathfrak{h}^*_i\otimes_kk'={\mathfrak{h}'_i}^*. By Chap. VII, §3, no. 2, Th. 1, there exists an automorphism of g′\mathfrak{g}' taking h1′\mathfrak{h}'_1 to h2′\mathfrak{h}'_2, hence an isomorphism φ\varphi from h1′∗{\mathfrak{h}'_1}^* to h2′∗{\mathfrak{h}'_2}^* that takes R(g′,h1′)R(\mathfrak{g}',\mathfrak{h}'_1) to R(g′,h2′)R(\mathfrak{g}',\mathfrak{h}'_2). Then φ∣h1∗\varphi |\mathfrak{h}^*_1 takes R(g,h1)R(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}_1) to R(g,h2)R(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}_2), and hence h1∗\mathfrak{h}^*_1 to h2∗\mathfrak{h}^*_2. Q.E.D.

In view of Prop. 3, the root system of (g,h)(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}) depends, up to isomorphism, only on g\mathfrak{g} and not on h\mathfrak{h}. In the same way, the Weyl group, group of weights ... .. of (g,h)(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}) are simply called, by abuse of language, the Weyl group, group of weights ... .. of g\mathfrak{g} (cf. also §5, no. 3, Remark 2). If the Dynkin graph of g\mathfrak{g} is of type AlA_l, or Bl,..B_l,. .. (cf. Chap. VI, §4, no. 2, Th. 3), we say that g\mathfrak{g} is of type AlA_l, or Bl,..B_l,. ...

Recall that, if α\alpha and β\beta are linearly independent roots, the set of j∈Zj\in \mathbf{Z} such that β+jα∈R\beta +j\alpha \in R is an interval [−q,p][-q, p] of Z\mathbf{Z} containing 0, with p−q=p-q= −⟨β,α∨⟩=−β(Hα)-\langle \beta , \alpha^{\vee}\rangle =-\beta (H_{\alpha}) (Chap. VI, §1, no. 3, Prop. 9).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.