Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 015U, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 015U].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 9. The formula of Hermann Weyl

Let λ∈h∗\lambda \in \mathfrak{h}^*. The module Z(λ)(Z(\lambda ) (§6, no. 3) admits a character that is an element of Z⟨P⟩\mathbf{Z}\langle P\rangle, and we have dd. ch Z(λ)=eλ+ρZ(\lambda ) =e^{\lambda+\rho}.

Let α1,...,αq\alpha_1, . . . , \alpha_q be distinct elements of R+R_+. The X−α1n1X−α2n2...X−αqnq⊗1X_{-\alpha_1}^{n_1}X_{-\alpha_2}^{n_2}. . . X_{-\alpha_q}^{n_q}\otimes 1 form a basis of Z(λ)(Z(\lambda ) (§6, Prop. 6 (iii)). For h∈hh\in \mathfrak{h}, we have

h.(X−α1n1X−α2n2...X−αqnq⊗1) h.(X_{-\alpha_1}^{n_1}X_{-\alpha_2}^{n_2}. . .X_{-\alpha_q}^{n_q}\otimes 1)
=[h,X−α1n1...X−αqnq]⊗1+(X−α1n1...X−αqnq)⊗h.1 = [h, X_{-\alpha_1}^{n_1}. . . X_{-\alpha_q}^{n_q}]\otimes 1 + (X_{-\alpha_1}^{n_1}. . . X_{-\alpha_q}^{n_q})\otimes h.1
=(λ−n1α1−⋯−nqαq)(h)(X−α1n1...X−αqnq⊗1) = (\lambda -n_1\alpha_1- \cdots -n_q\alpha_q)(h)(X_{-\alpha_1}^{n_1}. . . X_{-\alpha_q}^{n_q}\otimes 1)

Thus, the dimension of Z(λ)λ−μZ(\lambda )^{\lambda-\mu} is P(μ)\mathfrak{P}(\mu). This proves that ch Z(λ)Z(\lambda ) is defined, is an element of Z⟨P⟩\mathbf{Z}\langle P\rangle, and that

ch Z(λ)=∑μP(μ)eλ−μ=KeλZ(\lambda ) =\sum_\mu\mathfrak{P}(\mu)e^{\lambda-\mu}= Ke^{\lambda}.

It now suffices to apply Lemma 1.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.