Bourbaki

Proposition 11

Tag 01ME, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01ME].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 1. Produits fibrés et carrés cartésiens

Let

X′f′{X'}^{f'} X

p′pp'p

B′f{B'}^f B

a cartesian square.

a) Suppose the mapping ff strict and surjective. Then, if the mapping p′p' is open ( resp. closed, resp. proper), the same is true of pp.

b) Suppose that the mapping ff is closed and surjective. Then, if the mapping p′p' is strict, the same is true of pp.

c) Suppose that the mapping ff is universally strict and surjective. Then, if the mapping p′p' is strict, the same is true of pp.

Let us first remark that for every subset A of X, one has

p′((f−1′)(A))=f−1(p(A))(20) p'((\overset{-1}{f}')(A)) =\overset{-1}{f}(p(A)) \tag{20}

In fact, if x′∈(f−1′)(A)x'\in (\overset{-1}{f}')(A), then f(p′(x′))=p∘f′(x′)∈p(A)f(p'(x')) =p\circ f'(x')\in p(A). Conversely, if b′∈f−1(p(A))b'\in \overset{-1}{f}(p(A)), let x∈Ax\in A be such that f(b′)=p(x)f(b') =p(x). By definition of a cartesian square, there exists a unique x′∈X′x'\in X' such that f′(x′)=xf'(x') =x and p′(x′)=b′p'(x') =b', so that b′∈p′((f−1′)(A))b'\in p'((\overset{-1}{f}')(A)).

Let us prove a). Suppose first that p′p' is an open (resp. closed) mapping and let A be an open (resp. closed) set in X. The set (f−1′)(A)(\overset{-1}{f}')(A) is open (resp. closed) in X′X'. Hence the set p′((f−1′)(A))p'((\overset{-1}{f}')(A)) is open (resp. closed) in B′B'. By relation (20), it is also saturated with respect to the equivalence relation defined by ff. Since the mapping ff is supposed surjective, one then has p(A)=p(A) =

f(p′((f−1′)(A)))f(p'((\overset{-1}{f}')(A))), and since it is strict, the set p(A)p(A) is open (resp. closed) in B. The mapping pp is therefore open (resp. closed).

In order that a continuous mapping be proper, it is necessary and sufficient that it be closed and that its fibres be quasi-compact (TG, I, p. 75, th. 1). If the mapping p′p' is proper, the mapping pp is closed by what precedes. Let us study its fibres: if b∈Bb\in B, let b′∈B′b'\in B' be such that f(b′)=bf(b') =b. By the corollary of I, p. 10, the mapping f′f' induces a homeomorphism Xb′′→XbX'_{b'}\rightarrow X_b. Since p′p' is proper, Xb′′X'_{b'} is quasi-compact, hence XbX_b is so also. The mapping pp is therefore proper.

Let us prove b) and c). Let Y = p(X)p(X) and Y′=p′(X′)Y'=p'(X') ; relation (20) applied to X implies that Y′=f−1(Y)Y'=\overset{-1}{f}(Y). Let gg denote the mapping of Y′Y' into Y induced by ff. In case b), the mapping gg is strict by remark 1, I, p. 18. In case c), it is strict by virtue of definition 6 since the square

Y′Y' Y

B′B' B

is cartesian.

Let qq and q′q' denote the mappings of X into Y and of X′X' into Y′Y' induced by pp and p′p', so that the square

X′f′{X'}^{f'} X

q′qq'q

Y′g{Y'}^g Y

is cartesian. Since the mappings gg and q′q' are both strict and surjective, their composite g∘q′g\circ q' is strict. Hence q∘f′q\circ f' is strict and p∘f′p\circ f' is itself strict. Since ff is surjective, f′f' is so also and pp is strict by prop. 9, b) of I, p. 18.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.