Proposition 11
Tag 01ME, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01ME].
Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 1. Produits fibrés et carrés cartésiens
Let
X
B
a cartesian square.
a) Suppose the mapping strict and surjective. Then, if the mapping is open ( resp. closed, resp. proper), the same is true of .
b) Suppose that the mapping is closed and surjective. Then, if the mapping is strict, the same is true of .
c) Suppose that the mapping is universally strict and surjective. Then, if the mapping is strict, the same is true of .
Let us first remark that for every subset A of X, one has
In fact, if , then . Conversely, if , let be such that . By definition of a cartesian square, there exists a unique such that and , so that .
Let us prove a). Suppose first that is an open (resp. closed) mapping and let A be an open (resp. closed) set in X. The set is open (resp. closed) in . Hence the set is open (resp. closed) in . By relation (20), it is also saturated with respect to the equivalence relation defined by . Since the mapping is supposed surjective, one then has
, and since it is strict, the set is open (resp. closed) in B. The mapping is therefore open (resp. closed).
In order that a continuous mapping be proper, it is necessary and sufficient that it be closed and that its fibres be quasi-compact (TG, I, p. 75, th. 1). If the mapping is proper, the mapping is closed by what precedes. Let us study its fibres: if , let be such that . By the corollary of I, p. 10, the mapping induces a homeomorphism . Since is proper, is quasi-compact, hence is so also. The mapping is therefore proper.
Let us prove b) and c). Let Y = and ; relation (20) applied to X implies that . Let denote the mapping of into Y induced by . In case b), the mapping is strict by remark 1, I, p. 18. In case c), it is strict by virtue of definition 6 since the square
Y
B
is cartesian.
Let and denote the mappings of X into Y and of into induced by and , so that the square
X
Y
is cartesian. Since the mappings and are both strict and surjective, their composite is strict. Hence is strict and is itself strict. Since is surjective, is so also and is strict by prop. 9, b) of I, p. 18.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.