§ 1. Fibred products and cartesian squares
1. Structure of a B-space
Let B be a topological space.
Definition 1 01L9
A topological B-space (or simply a B-space) is a topological space X, endowed with a continuous mapping of X into B. The mapping is called the projection of the B-space X.
Let X, be B-spaces and their respective projections. A B-morphism of X into is a continuous mapping of X into such that .
It is sometimes convenient to denote by the B-space obtained by endowing the topological space X with the continuous mapping .
The composite of two B-morphisms is a B-morphism. The isomorphisms of B-spaces, also called B-isomorphisms, are the B-morphisms which are homeomorphisms.
Thus, if one calls a B-space structure on a set X the datum of a topology on X and of a continuous mapping , one can take the B-morphisms as morphisms of the B-space structure (E, IV, p. 11).
© N. Bourbaki and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2 016
N. Bourbaki, Algebraic Topology, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49361-8_1 1
Let X, be B-spaces. We denote by the set of B-morphisms of X into , by Isom the set of B-isomorphisms of X into , and by Aut the set of B-automorphisms of X, that is to say of B-isomorphisms of X into X.
Let X be a B-space and its projection. If B is endowed with the B-space structure whose projection is Id, the set is the set of continuous sections (E, II, p. 18, Definition 11) of .
Let X be a B-space, its projection and a point of B. The subspace of X is called the fibre of X at (or the fibre of at ) and denoted by . In order that a continuous mapping of X into a B-space be a B-morphism, it is necessary and sufficient that be contained in for every .
Let X be a B-space and its projection. Let be a continuous mapping of a topological space into B. A continuous mapping such that is called a continuous lifting of to X. In other words, if is endowed with the B-space structure of projection , the continuous liftings of to X are the B-morphisms of into X.
2. Operations on B-spaces
Let B be a topological space.
Let X be a B-space and its projection. Every topological subspace Y of X is endowed with the B-space structure whose projection is . Let A be a subspace of B; endowed with the mapping deduced from by passing to subsets, the topological space is an A-space. It is called the A-space induced by over A and is sometimes denoted by .
Let be a family of B-spaces, and let be the projection of . The sum space (TG, I, p. 15), endowed with the mapping B defined by (for I and ), is a B-space called the sum of the family of B-spaces . The canonical injections are B-morphisms.
Let X be a B-space, its projection, and let R be an equivalence relation on X. Let us denote by the quotient space (TG, I, p. 20, def. 3). If the mapping is compatible with the relation R (E, II, p. 44), the mapping deduced from by passing to the quotient is continuous (TG, I, p. 21, prop. 6); the B-space obtained by endowing with the projection is then called the quotient B-space of X by the relation R.
3. Fibred product of two B-spaces
Let B be a topological space, X and B-spaces, and their respective projections. Let us denote by the topological subspace of formed by the pairs such that . The mapping defined by is continuous.
Definition 2 01LA
The topological space is called the fibred product of X and over B. The B-space obtained by endowing with the mapping is called the product B-space of X and .
The restrictions to of the projections of into X and into are again denoted by pr and pr and called the first and second projections of the fibred product. They are continuous and are B-morphisms, for one has pr pr.
It should be noted that may be empty even if X and are non-empty: in fact, the relation is equivalent to saying that and are disjoint.
Let Y be a B-space and B-morphisms. There exists a unique B-morphism such that pr and pr = (universal property of the product B-space of two B-spaces): this is the mapping of Y into , which is sometimes denoted by .
Let be B-spaces, let be B-morphisms. The mapping is a B-morphism of into , which is denoted by and is called the extension of and to fibred products.
Example 1 01LB
Let X and be B-spaces; then the mapping defines a B-isomorphism of onto .
Example 2 01LC
Let X, be B-spaces and let be their respective projections. The product B-space is the topological subspace of formed by the triples such that , endowed with the projection defined by .
Example 3 01LD
Let X be a B-space and its projection. The fibred product of X and X over B is called the fibred square of X. It is the subspace of formed by the pairs such that . It is endowed with the structure of a B-space whose projection is the mapping . The diagonal of (E, II, p. 13) is contained in ; it is also called the diagonal of . The mapping of X into is a B-morphism, called the diagonal B-morphism and often denoted by ; it defines a B-isomorphism of X onto (TG, I, p. 25, cor. 2).
Example 4 01LE
Let be a family of topological spaces and let, for each , and be -spaces. Put , and . Endowed with the continuous mapping (resp. ), the topological space X (resp. Y) is a B-space. By the associativity isomorphism of the topological products of onto (TG, I, p. 25, prop. 2), the subspace of is identified with .
Example 5 01LF
Let and be families of B-spaces. Let X and Y be their sums. For each , the mapping is a B-isomorphism of onto the subspace of . Since the latter form a partition of into open subsets, the mapping
defined by is a B-isomorphism.
4. Change of base
Let B, be topological spaces and a continuous mapping. Let X be a B-space. The mapping endows with a structure of B-space, which makes it possible to define the fibred product . The latter, endowed with the mapping pr, is a -space called the -space deduced from the B-space X by the base change (or by base change from B to following ). It is also called the -space inverse image of X by . It is denoted by , or sometimes when there is no possible confusion about the mapping .
When is a subspace of B and is the canonical injection, the mapping of into (where is the projection of X) is a -isomorphism of onto the -space induced by X over .
Let Y be a second B-space and a B-morphism. The mapping Id is a -morphism, called the -morphism deduced from the B-morphism by the base change and sometimes denoted by , or when there is no possible confusion about the mapping . It is the unique -morphism of into such that pr pr.
Let be a topological space and let be a continuous mapping. Then the mapping given by is an isomorphism of -spaces of onto , which will be said to be canonical.
5. Fibred product of a family of B-spaces
Let be a family of B-spaces. Let be their projections. Let denote the topological subspace of formed by the pairs such that for all . The mapping defined by is continuous.
Definition 3 01LG
The topological space is called the fibred product of the family over B. The B-space obtained by endowing with the mapping is called the product B-space of the family .
Let . The mapping pr of into is called the projection of index of the fibred product and is again denoted by pr. It is continuous. It is a B-morphism, for one has pr.
Let Y be a B-space and its projection. For each I, let be a B-morphism. There exists a unique B-morphism such that pr for each (universal property of the product B-space): it is the mapping of Y into , defined by , which is sometimes denoted by .
Let and be families of B-spaces and, for each , let be a B-morphism. The mapping is a B-morphism of into which is denoted by and is called the extension of the family to the fibred products.
Example 1 01LH
When the set I is empty, the set consists of a single element and the B-space is identified with B (endowed with the projection Id).
Example 2 01LI
When I is not empty, one deduces from the mapping of into , by passing to subspaces, a homeomorphism of onto the subspace of formed by the families such that for all . This subspace will be called, by abuse, the fibred product of the family .
Example 3 01LJ
When the set I is a set with one element (resp. with two elements and ; resp. with three elements ), the mapping pr (resp. (pr, pr) ; resp. (pr, pr, pr)) of into (resp. into ; resp. into ) is a B-isomorphism. This will allow us to deduce the properties of the fibred product of two or three B-spaces from those of the fibred product of families of B-spaces.
Let be a family of B-spaces and let J be a subset of I. From the mapping Id pr of into , by passing to subsets, one deduces a B-morphism . One
again denotes it by pr and calls it the projection of index J of the fibre product.
Let be a family of B-spaces. Let be a partition
of I. The mapping (pr) of is a
B-isomorphism ("associativity" of fibre products of B-spaces).
6. Cartesian Squares
Let B, , X, be topological spaces and let , be continuous mappings. Such a quadruple may be represented by a diagram
X
B
(E, II, p. 14). One then says: "Consider square diagram (1)," or simply "square (1)," instead of saying: "Consider the quadruple of continuous mappings." One says that square (1) is commutative if the equality
is satisfied. In this case, one often endows , X and with the structures of B-spaces defined by the mappings and respectively; the mappings and are then B-morphisms.
Definition 4 01LK
One says that square (1) is a Cartesian square of topological spaces (or, simply, that it is Cartesian) if it is commutative and if, for every topological space Y and every pair of continuous mappings such that , there exists a unique continuous mapping such that and .
For square (1) to be Cartesian, it is necessary and sufficient that the square
X B
be Cartesian.
Proposition 1 01LL
For square (1) to be Cartesian, it is necessary and sufficient that it be commutative and that, for every B-space Y and every pair of B-morphisms , there exist a unique B-morphism such that and .
Suppose that square (1) is Cartesian. Let Y be a B-space and let be B-morphisms. The mappings and are both equal to the projection of the B-space Y; the unique continuous mapping such that and is then a B-morphism. This proves the necessity of the condition.
Conversely, suppose this condition satisfied. Let Y be a topological space and let be continuous mappings such that . When Y is endowed with the structure of a B-space defined by and are B-morphisms. Every continuous mapping such that and being a B-morphism, there exists one and only one.
Proposition 2 01LM
Let B, and X be topological spaces and let be continuous mappings.
a) The square
X
(2) pr
B
is a Cartesian square.
b) For every commutative square
X
B
there exists a unique continuous mapping such that pr and pr.
c) The commutative square (3) is cartesian if and only if is a homeomorphism.
Assertion a) results from Prop. 1 and from the universal property of the product B-space of two B-spaces (I, p. 3). Assertion b) follows from it.
If square (3) is cartesian, there exists a unique continuous mapping such that = pr and pr. We have and , whence Id since square (3) is cartesian. We have pr = pr and pr = pr, whence Id since square (2) is cartesian. This proves that is a homeomorphism.
Conversely, suppose that is a homeomorphism; since square (2) is cartesian, square (3) is also cartesian.
The mapping whose existence and uniqueness is asserted by assertion b) of the preceding proposition will be said to be canonical: it is the mapping denoted by in I, p. 3.
Proposition 3 01LN
Let
X
B
be a cartesian square. For every continuous section of , the mapping is a continuous lifting of to X. The mapping is a bijection of onto .
If is a continuous section of , we have , which proves that is a continuous lifting of to X, i.e. a B-morphism from into X. Conversely, let be a B-morphism. We have Id; there therefore exists, by definition of a cartesian square, a unique continuous mapping such that Id and , whence the proposition.
7. Cartesian Squares Constructed by Passing to Subspaces
Proposition 4 01LO
Let
X
B
be a cartesian square, and let be subspaces of B, and X respectively. Suppose that we have and put . Then the square
(where the mappings are deduced from respectively by passing to the subsets) is cartesian.
Consider the canonical mapping deduced from commutative diagram (4). Since square (4) is Cartesian, is a
homeomorphism. By construction, one has and the mapping deduced from commutative diagram () is deduced from by passing to subsets. It is therefore a homeomorphism and square () is Cartesian (Prop. 2).
Corollary 01LP
Let
X
B
be a Cartesian square.
a) For every point of , the mapping induces a homeomorphism of the fibre of onto the fibre of .
b) If the mapping is injective (resp. surjective, resp. bijective), the same is true of .
Let be a point of . Put . For every , one has , whence . This proves that
one has . In Prop. 4, take and ; one then has , whence assertion a).
For the mapping to be injective (resp. surjective, resp. bijective), it is necessary and sufficient that the cardinal of each of its fibres be less than (resp. greater than, resp. equal to) 1. Assertion b) follows.
Example 01LQ
Let be a B-space and A a subspace of B. The square
X
A B
(where and are the canonical injections) is Cartesian.
In particular, if A and are subspaces of the topological space B, the square
(6)
A B
(where the arrows are the canonical injections) is Cartesian.
8. Cartesian Squares Constructed by Products, Fibre Products and Sums
(where are the extensions of the families , , , to the products) is Cartesian.
Let Y be a topological space, let and be continuous mappings such that . For , put = pr and pr; one has and there exists a unique continuous mapping such that and . Then the mapping is a continuous mapping of Y into such that and , and it is the only one having these properties.
Corollary 1 01LS
Let X be a B-space, let be its projection, and let F be a topological space. The square
is cartesian.
Let P be a topological space consisting of a single point. Corollary 1 follows from Prop. 5 applied to the cartesian squares
Let B and be topological spaces and let B be a continuous mapping. Let I be a set and, for each , let be a B-space, a -space, and a continuous mapping such that the square
(9)
B
be commutative. There exists a unique continuous mapping
such that pr pr for every and such that the square
B
B be commutative (this last condition resulting from the others if I ) it is the mapping deduced from the mapping
by passing to the subsets. With these notations:
Corollary 2 01LT
If the square (9) is cartesian for every , the square () is cartesian.
From Prop. 5 one deduces a cartesian square
Let and denote the diagonals of and . The diagram
B
deduced from the preceding one by passing to the subspaces is cartesian (I, p. 9, Prop. 4). It is identified with diagram ().
Example 1 01LU
Let
X
B
be a cartesian square. Then Corollary 2 yields a cartesian square
B .
We have the relation . In fact, by prop. 2 of I, p. 8, it is enough to consider the case where . Let then be an element of with and . This element belongs to if and only if .
Proposition 6 01LV
Let I be a set and, for every , let
X
B
be a cartesian square. Let and be the sum spaces of the families and respectively. Let and be the mappings deduced from the families , and respectively. The square
X
B
is cartesian.
The mappings and are continuous. The commutativity of square () follows from its definition. Let us denote by the canonical homeomorphism of onto (I, p. 8, prop. 2) and by the canonical mapping (loc. cit.). We have where is the homeomorphism deduced from the and is that defined in example 5 of I, p. 4. We conclude by prop. 2 of I, p. 8.
Example 2 01LW
Let be a B-space and let be a family of subspaces of B. Let A be the sum space of the family and let Y be the sum space of the family ; let us denote by , and the mappings deduced from the canonical injections of into B, the canonical injections of into X, and the mappings , for . The square
Y X
A B is cartesian; this follows from the example of I, p. 10 and from prop. 6.
9. Composition of cartesian squares
Proposition 7 01LX
Let
X
(12) and (13)
B
be commutative squares; consider the square
X
B .
It is commutative. If squares (12) and (13) are cartesian, the same is true of square (14). If squares (13) and (14) are cartesian, the same is true of square (12).
Square (14) is commutative, for we have .
Let us denote by and the canonical continuous mappings deduced from the commutative squares (12), (13) and (14). Moreover, let us denote
the continuous mapping which associates to the element . It is a homeomorphism and one has (Id).
Suppose that square (13) is cartesian. Then is a homeomorphism (I, p. 8, prop 2), hence the mapping Id is a homeomorphism, and is a homeomorphism if and only if is one. This means that square (12) is cartesian if and only if square (14) is cartesian (loc. cit.).
With the notation of proposition 7, one sometimes says that square (14) is the square composed of squares (13) and (12). The first assertion expresses that the square composed of two cartesian squares is cartesian. In particular, the -spaces and are isomorphic.
Remark 1 01LY
It may happen that squares (12) and (14) are cartesian without square (13) being so (I, p. 139, exerc. 2).
Remark 2 01LZ
Let and be continuous mappings. The mapping defined by is a homeomorphism of onto the graph G of the mapping (TG, I, p. 25, cor. 2), and the fibred product is identified (I, p. 6) with the subspace of , inverse image of G under the mapping Id. By the example of I, p. 10 and cor. 1 of prop. 5 (I, p. 11), the squares
X
pr Id and Id
B
(where denotes the canonical injection) are cartesian, and the cartesian square
X
pr
B
is their composite. In other words, every cartesian square is identified with the square composed of a cartesian square obtained by product (I, p. 11, cor. 1 of prop. 5, square (8)) and of a cartesian square obtained by passing to subspaces (I, p. 10, example, square (5)).
Remark 3 01M0
Let
X X
(15) and (16)
B B
be cartesian squares. Consider the square
X
B where (resp. ) is the mapping which defines the structure of B-space (resp. of X-space) of the fibred product (resp. of the fibred product ), and where is the mapping deduced from by passing to subsets. It is cartesian (I, p. 13, cor. 2 of prop. 5).
Consider then the following two commutative squares:
and
Square (17) is composed of squares (15) and (18), as well as of squares (16) and (19). By prop. 7, squares (18) and (19) are cartesian.
10. Strict Mappings
Proposition 8 01M1
Let
be a cartesian square. If the mapping is open ( resp. is proper, resp. has in a neighbourhood of each point a continuous section), the same is true of .
By remark 2, I, p. 16, it is enough to prove the proposition for cartesian squares of the following type:
where F is a topological space, A a subspace of B, and the canonical injections. If the mapping is open, the mappings and Id are open (TG, I, p. 30, prop. 2 and TG, I, p. 34, prop. 8). If the mapping is proper, the mappings and Id are proper (TG, I, p. 72, prop. 3 and TG, I, p. 72, def. 1). If U is an open subset of B and a continuous section of over U, the mapping is a continuous section of over and the mapping Id is a continuous section of Id over .
Remark 1 01M2
With the notation of prop. 8, if is a closed mapping, this is not necessarily so for cf. TG, I, p. 72, example). However, if the mapping is closed and if A is a subspace of B, the mapping is closed (TG, I, p. 30, prop. 2, a)).
Definition 5 01M3
Let X and Y be topological spaces and a mapping. Let R be the equivalence relation associated with , and
the canonical decomposition of (E, II, p. 44). One says that the mapping is strict if is a homeomorphism, when is endowed with the quotient topology and with the topology induced by that of Y.
A strict mapping is continuous.
Let us recall (TG, I, p. 22, prop. 8) that, in order that a mapping be strict, it is necessary and sufficient that be continuous and that for every open (resp. closed) saturated subset A of X, the set be open (resp. closed) in .
Example 1 01M4
The composite of two strict mappings is not necessarily strict. In fact, every continuous mapping is the composite of the mapping pr Y and of the mapping of X into , which are both strict (TG, I, p. 26, prop. 5 and TG, I, p. 25, cor. 2). On the other hand, the composite of two strict and injective (resp. surjective) mappings is a strict mapping.
Example 2 01M5
A continuous mapping which is open, or closed, or which possesses a continuous section, is strict. This follows from prop. 3 of TG, I, p. 32 and from prop. 9 of TG, I, p. 22.
Example 3 01M6
In order that a continuous homomorphism of one topological group into another be a strict morphism (TG, III, p. 16, def. 1), it is necessary and sufficient that it be a strict mapping in the sense of Definition 5.
Proposition 9 01M7
Let X, Y and Z be topological spaces. Let be a continuous surjective mapping and a mapping.
a) If is strict and if is continuous, the mapping is continuous.
b) If is continuous and if is strict, the mapping is strict.
c) If and are strict, is strict.
Let us prove assertion a). Let R denote the relation associated with in X; by hypothesis, the mapping of onto Y deduced from by passing to the quotient is a homeomorphism. The first assertion then follows from prop. 6 of I, p. 21.
Let us prove b). Let B be a closed saturated subset of Y for the relation defined by and let . Since is continuous, A is closed in X, and A is saturated for the equivalence relation defined by . Since is strict and is surjective, is therefore closed in Z. The continuous mapping is therefore strict.
Assertion c) results immediately from assertions a) and b).
Proposition 10 01M8
Let X be a topological space and let R be an equivalence relation in X. Let Y be a locally compact topological space. Let S be the equivalence relation in which is the product of the equivalence relation R in X and of the equality relation in Y. The canonical bijection is a homeomorphism.
Recall that if U and V are topological spaces, denotes the set of continuous mappings of U into V, endowed with the topology of compact convergence (TG, X, p. 26, def. 1).
Let and be the canonical surjections. Let denote the canonical bijection. It is continuous; let denote its inverse and let us prove that it is continuous.
The mapping such that, for every X, is the mapping defined by , is continuous (TG, X, p. 28, th. 3). The mapping which associates with a continuous mapping the mapping , is continuous (TG, X, p. 29, prop. 9). Consequently, the mapping is continuous. It is compatible with the equivalence relation R; the unique mapping such that is therefore continuous. We have for every pair . Since Y is locally compact, it then follows from TG, X, p. 28, th. 3, that the mapping is continuous.
The conclusion of Proposition 10 is no longer necessarily true if Y is not locally compact (TG, I, p. 96, exerc. 6).
Corollary 01M9
Let X and Y be topological spaces and let Y be a continuous mapping. Let T be a locally compact topological space. If the mapping is strict, the same is true of the mapping Id of into .
11. Universally strict mappings
Let
X
B
be a cartesian square, where the mapping is strict. The mapping is not necessarily strict (cf. TG, I, p. 96, exerc. 6). However, if A is an open or closed subspace of B, the mapping is strict (TG, I, p. 23, cor. 1).
Definition 6 01MA
Let be a continuous mapping. One says that the mapping is universally strict if for every cartesian square
X
B
the mapping is strict.
A universally strict mapping is strict. With the notations of Definition 6, if the mapping is universally strict, the same is true of . This results immediately from def. 6 and prop. 7 of I, p. 15.
Corollary 01MB
A continuous mapping which is open, or proper, or which admits in a neighbourhood of every point a continuous section, is universally strict (prop. 8 and example 2).
Example 01MC
Let B be a topological space and let be a covering of B; let A denote the sum space of the family , and let be the canonical mapping. The mapping is universally strict under each of the following two assumptions:
(i) For every point , there exists such that is an interior point of ;
(ii) The family is locally finite and the are closed subsets of B.
Under assumption (i), the mapping possesses in a neighbourhood of every point a continuous section. Under assumption (ii), the mapping is proper by definition of the sum space (resp. from TG, I, p. 6, prop. 4 and TG, I, p. 75, th. 1). It is therefore universally strict.
Remark 01MD
A closed mapping is not necessarily universally strict (cf. TG, I, p. 96, exerc. 6).
Proposition 11 01ME
Let
X
B
a cartesian square.
a) Suppose the mapping strict and surjective. Then, if the mapping is open ( resp. closed, resp. proper), the same is true of .
b) Suppose that the mapping is closed and surjective. Then, if the mapping is strict, the same is true of .
c) Suppose that the mapping is universally strict and surjective. Then, if the mapping is strict, the same is true of .
Let us first remark that for every subset A of X, one has
In fact, if , then . Conversely, if , let be such that . By definition of a cartesian square, there exists a unique such that and , so that .
Let us prove a). Suppose first that is an open (resp. closed) mapping and let A be an open (resp. closed) set in X. The set is open (resp. closed) in . Hence the set is open (resp. closed) in . By relation (20), it is also saturated with respect to the equivalence relation defined by . Since the mapping is supposed surjective, one then has
, and since it is strict, the set is open (resp. closed) in B. The mapping is therefore open (resp. closed).
In order that a continuous mapping be proper, it is necessary and sufficient that it be closed and that its fibres be quasi-compact (TG, I, p. 75, th. 1). If the mapping is proper, the mapping is closed by what precedes. Let us study its fibres: if , let be such that . By the corollary of I, p. 10, the mapping induces a homeomorphism . Since is proper, is quasi-compact, hence is so also. The mapping is therefore proper.
Let us prove b) and c). Let Y = and ; relation (20) applied to X implies that . Let denote the mapping of into Y induced by . In case b), the mapping is strict by remark 1, I, p. 18. In case c), it is strict by virtue of definition 6 since the square
Y
B
is cartesian.
Let and denote the mappings of X into Y and of into induced by and , so that the square
X
Y
is cartesian. Since the mappings and are both strict and surjective, their composite is strict. Hence is strict and is itself strict. Since is surjective, is so also and is strict by prop. 9, b) of I, p. 18.
Corollary 1 01MF
Suppose that the mapping is universally strict and surjective and that the mapping is universally strict. Then the mapping is universally strict.
Let
Y X
C B
be a cartesian square; it is a question of proving that the mapping is strict. By remark 3 of I, p. 16, the squares
and
Y
C
are cartesian, where denotes the mapping induced by . Since the mapping is universally strict and surjective, the same is true of the mapping pr (I, p. 20, def. 6 and I, p. 10, cor. of prop. 4). On the other hand, the mapping is strict, since is assumed universally strict. By prop. 11, c) applied to the cartesian square (21), the mapping is strict.
Corollary 2 01MG
Let B and X be topological spaces and let be a continuous mapping. Let be a family of subsets of B which is an open covering of B, or else a locally finite closed covering of B. If for every I, the mapping is strict ( resp. universally strict), the mapping is strict ( resp. universally strict).
For every , put and . Let A be the sum space of the family , Y the sum space of the family ; let us denote by (resp. ) the mapping deduced from the family of canonical injections (resp. from the canonical injections , from the mappings ). The square
Y X
A B
is a cartesian square (examples, I, p. 10 and p. 14). By the corollary, I, p. 20, the mapping is universally strict. By proposition 11, it is therefore enough to prove that the mapping is strict (resp. universally strict) if the mappings , for , are so. We are thus reduced to proving the corollary when the sets , , constitute a partition of the space B into open and closed subsets, which we shall henceforth suppose.
Suppose that each of the mappings , is strict. If U is an open subset of X and saturated for the equivalence relation defined by , the set is open in and is open in B. The mapping is therefore strict.
Suppose now that each of the mappings , is universally strict, and now prove that the mapping is universally strict. Let C be a topological space and a continuous mapping. It is a question of proving that the mapping pr is strict. The space C is identified with the sum space of the family of the and the space is identified with the sum space of the family of the . Since is universally strict, the mapping pr is strict. By what precedes, the mapping pr is strict. This proves that the mapping is universally strict.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 1.